I always look at two sides. I would say this, the US needs to have frivolous lawsuit reform. No merits to the case in a civil suit, the attorney and the plaintiff pay the freight. In 1993 a company I worked for was sued for 175k. The issue was the inspector missed a bathroom fan that did not work. The agent suggested the client use a particular property inspector, and the agent also directed the financing to a fellow loan officer of mine. The LO had no way of knowing the bathroom fan did not work, but yet the company was brought into the law suit. It cost the company 15 k in attorney fees to have it dismissed. Even though our company had no fault, the owner told the plaintiff they would put a new fan in at the companies expense. The borrower/plaintiff wanted their mortgage of 175k paid off. So if this player case has no legitimacy the plaintiff should pay all attorney fees.
The only "controversial" thing I will say is Rolo is not sophisticated. Being taped he exposed himself and the university to some criticism and left a crack open for some damages as he essentially said if you want to opt out fine, but if you are part of the pay for play movement then that is a problem.