ADVERTISEMENT

Anyone else see this?

F@ck that guy. I expected this day would come back when it all went down. But I also had already forgot all about him.
 
It was filed earlier in the month in US District Court in Dallas. His lawyer is (former?) Rice FB dad.

The lawsuit (link in article) is fun read.
 
Doesn’t look like he transferred to another team which is no surprise considering his antics. Even if he’s the second coming of Jerry Rice no one in their right mind would want to assume the risk of having him in their program.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cr8zyncalif
WSU is obviously going to defend their decision to tell athletes not to discuss COVID cases as their reasonable attempt to follow HIPAA requirements. Unless they can prove that Rolovich or WSU specifically torpedoed his chances at other schools, he's gonna have a hard time proving that WSU did anything wrong.

Of course, perception is a powerful thing and with Rolovich's choice to be a rebel on the vaccine, it certainly doesn't paint him in a good light.
 
Doesn’t look like he transferred to another team which is no surprise considering his antics. Even if he’s the second coming of Jerry Rice no one in their right mind would want to assume the risk of having him in their program.
He transferred to Northern Colorado (FCS-Big Sky Conf).
 
WSU is obviously going to defend their decision to tell athletes not to discuss COVID cases as their reasonable attempt to follow HIPAA requirements. Unless they can prove that Rolovich or WSU specifically torpedoed his chances at other schools, he's gonna have a hard time proving that WSU did anything wrong.

Of course, perception is a powerful thing and with Rolovich's choice to be a rebel on the vaccine, it certainly doesn't paint him in a good light.
I would think secretly recording a phone conversation with your coach and leaking it to the press torpedoed his own career. Plus he landed at Northern Colorado on scholarship so it's not like Zaire Webb who was left out in the cold.
 
WSU is obviously going to defend their decision to tell athletes not to discuss COVID cases as their reasonable attempt to follow HIPAA requirements. Unless they can prove that Rolovich or WSU specifically torpedoed his chances at other schools, he's gonna have a hard time proving that WSU did anything wrong.

Of course, perception is a powerful thing and with Rolovich's choice to be a rebel on the vaccine, it certainly doesn't paint him in a good light.
It is a fallacy to assume a civil case may or must have at least some underlying merit. Two words -- "Sidney Powell" or how about "Rudy Giuliani." Every case, no matter how outlandish has what's called, "nuisance value," and depending on the circumstances, that value can be quite high. Here, what is the value to WSU of stopping the school and football programs name continuing to be run though the mud.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Fab5Coug
It is a fallacy to assume a civil case may or must have at least some underlying merit. Two words -- "Sidney Powell" or how about "Rudy Giuliani." Every case, no matter how outlandish has what's called, "nuisance value," and depending on the circumstances, that value can be quite high. Here, what is the value to WSU of stopping the school and football programs name continuing to be run though the mud.
But here, would a settlement even stop the bad publicity, particularly at this point when lawsuit is in news already?

The negative publicity is likely Woods‘ goal (again).
 
Here we go. I'm bracing myself for the contrarian posters on here who take the side of this douchey ex-player and his Jackie Chiles attorney.
 
It’ll get a few clicks from a certain segment of the fanbase that it’s another reason to fire him. But it’ll be dismissed and he’ll have to pay Rolovich’s lawyer fees imo.
 
"financial responsibility" is apparently code now for cash-grab. What a joke. Not only that, but it's listed last as if it's an afterthought, when in reality it was the driving factor for the institutional push-back.

But hey, let's not ruin the narrative that Rolo is a racist.
 
Here we go. I'm bracing myself for the contrarian posters on here who take the side of this douchey ex-player and his Jackie Chiles attorney.
I don’t think it’s about that. It’s just more bad publicity which none of us want for the program.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Fab5Coug
I don’t think it’s about that. It’s just more bad publicity which none of us want for the program.

It really won’t change anybody’s opinion. The people who don’t like him this will just reaffirm they don’t like him. The people that think what Kassidy did is BS this just proves their point more. I don’t think this will sway anybody who did like him to not liking him.
 
Here we go. I'm bracing myself for the contrarian posters on here who take the side of this douchey ex-player and his Jackie Chiles attorney.
I always look at two sides. I would say this, the US needs to have frivolous lawsuit reform. No merits to the case in a civil suit, the attorney and the plaintiff pay the freight. In 1993 a company I worked for was sued for 175k. The issue was the inspector missed a bathroom fan that did not work. The agent suggested the client use a particular property inspector, and the agent also directed the financing to a fellow loan officer of mine. The LO had no way of knowing the bathroom fan did not work, but yet the company was brought into the law suit. It cost the company 15 k in attorney fees to have it dismissed. Even though our company had no fault, the owner told the plaintiff they would put a new fan in at the companies expense. The borrower/plaintiff wanted their mortgage of 175k paid off. So if this player case has no legitimacy the plaintiff should pay all attorney fees.

The only "controversial" thing I will say is Rolo is not sophisticated. Being taped he exposed himself and the university to some criticism and left a crack open for some damages as he essentially said if you want to opt out fine, but if you are part of the pay for play movement then that is a problem.
 
It really won’t change anybody’s opinion. The people who don’t like him this will just reaffirm they don’t like him. The people that think what Kassidy did is BS this just proves their point more. I don’t think this will sway anybody who did like him to not liking him.
When you say him, are you talking about Woods or Rolo?
 
I always look at two sides. I would say this, the US needs to have frivolous lawsuit reform. No merits to the case in a civil suit, the attorney and the plaintiff pay the freight. In 1993 a company I worked for was sued for 175k. The issue was the inspector missed a bathroom fan that did not work. The agent suggested the client use a particular property inspector, and the agent also directed the financing to a fellow loan officer of mine. The LO had no way of knowing the bathroom fan did not work, but yet the company was brought into the law suit. It cost the company 15 k in attorney fees to have it dismissed. Even though our company had no fault, the owner told the plaintiff they would put a new fan in at the companies expense. The borrower/plaintiff wanted their mortgage of 175k paid off. So if this player case has no legitimacy the plaintiff should pay all attorney fees.

The only "controversial" thing I will say is Rolo is not sophisticated. Being taped he exposed himself and the university to some criticism and left a crack open for some damages as he essentially said if you want to opt out fine, but if you are part of the pay for play movement then that is a problem.
You think we have frivolous lawsuits now, watch Texas after their new anti-abortion law goes into affect today. Anyone can accuse anyone of abetting abortion. The accused will then have to decide to pay the $10k or retain a lawyer and hope they don’t lose in court, and have lawyer fees on top of $10k.
 
I always look at two sides. I would say this, the US needs to have frivolous lawsuit reform. No merits to the case in a civil suit, the attorney and the plaintiff pay the freight. In 1993 a company I worked for was sued for 175k. The issue was the inspector missed a bathroom fan that did not work. The agent suggested the client use a particular property inspector, and the agent also directed the financing to a fellow loan officer of mine. The LO had no way of knowing the bathroom fan did not work, but yet the company was brought into the law suit. It cost the company 15 k in attorney fees to have it dismissed. Even though our company had no fault, the owner told the plaintiff they would put a new fan in at the companies expense. The borrower/plaintiff wanted their mortgage of 175k paid off. So if this player case has no legitimacy the plaintiff should pay all attorney fees.

The only "controversial" thing I will say is Rolo is not sophisticated. Being taped he exposed himself and the university to some criticism and left a crack open for some damages as he essentially said if you want to opt out fine, but if you are part of the pay for play movement then that is a problem.

Well, Rolovich also said nothing would happen to the scholarship for the 20-21 school year, but going forward could be a problem because WSU could not afford it. And of course Woods taping the conversation was a gross misdemeanor.
 
"Anyone else see this?" Of course! I always scour Witman County Watch before coffee every morning. Hell no... F this stupid, intentionally timed distraction. Get this pathetic joke off this site already. Nobody has time for this crybaby jibber jabber when it's game week.
 
Well, Rolovich also said nothing would happen to the scholarship for the 20-21 school year, but going forward could be a problem because WSU could not afford it. And of course Woods taping the conversation was a gross misdemeanor.
How does this work with phone conversations in one party consent states (like Texas)?
 
You think we have frivolous lawsuits now, watch Texas after their new anti-abortion law goes into affect today. Anyone can accuse anyone of abetting abortion. The accused will then have to decide to pay the $10k or retain a lawyer and hope they don’t lose in court, and have lawyer fees on top of $10k.
Wait...I thought Texas was all about individuals making their own personal health choices...well I digress....
 
It really won’t change anybody’s opinion. The people who don’t like him this will just reaffirm they don’t like him. The people that think what Kassidy did is BS this just proves their point more. I don’t think this will sway anybody who did like him to not liking him.
Perhaps. I’m up in the air on him until I see what his team does. If he wins 10 games this year this and the antivax thing will be forgotten. If he goes 6-6 this type of publicity won’t help him on the recruiting trail or the program in general IMO. FWIW I think what Kassidy is did is worse than the disgraceful exit of Marquis Wilson, and I’m not sure how Rolo does anything differently to avoid it. The kid had an agenda and playing football was not his priority.
 
How does this work with phone conversations in one party consent states (like Texas)?
The WA law applies no matter where the other party is located. And it sounds like Woods was back in Pullman when he recorded the call.
 
Perhaps. I’m up in the air on him until I see what his team does. If he wins 10 games this year this and the antivax thing will be forgotten. If he goes 6-6 this type of publicity won’t help him on the recruiting trail or the program in general IMO. FWIW I think what Kassidy is did is worse than the disgraceful exit of Marquis Wilson, and I’m not sure how Rolo does anything differently to avoid it. The kid had an agenda and playing football was not his priority.
his priority now is the same as it was then: $$$$$
 
I always look at two sides. I would say this, the US needs to have frivolous lawsuit reform. No merits to the case in a civil suit, the attorney and the plaintiff pay the freight. In 1993 a company I worked for was sued for 175k. The issue was the inspector missed a bathroom fan that did not work. The agent suggested the client use a particular property inspector, and the agent also directed the financing to a fellow loan officer of mine. The LO had no way of knowing the bathroom fan did not work, but yet the company was brought into the law suit. It cost the company 15 k in attorney fees to have it dismissed. Even though our company had no fault, the owner told the plaintiff they would put a new fan in at the companies expense. The borrower/plaintiff wanted their mortgage of 175k paid off. So if this player case has no legitimacy the plaintiff should pay all attorney fees.

The only "controversial" thing I will say is Rolo is not sophisticated. Being taped he exposed himself and the university to some criticism and left a crack open for some damages as he essentially said if you want to opt out fine, but if you are part of the pay for play movement then that is a problem.
There are way too many examples of this sort of thing. Unfortunately, a respectable proportion of every state legislature are the same people who directly, personally benefit from this sort of thing when they leave office. Rather discouraging.
 
  • Like
Reactions: COUGinNCW
This is written for the media, not for the court. Most of it can easily be shown to be inaccurate or misrepresented pretty easily. They can also show that the bulk of the 60 positive cases in student athletes were because those kids didn't follow protocols and went and partied together.

Even if there was a basis, I think big pieces of it are irrelevant because the claimant was not damaged while he was in Texas...so Texas courts shouldn't have authority.
 
This is written for the media, not for the court. Most of it can easily be shown to be inaccurate or misrepresented pretty easily. They can also show that the bulk of the 60 positive cases in student athletes were because those kids didn't follow protocols and went and partied together.

Even if there was a basis, I think big pieces of it are irrelevant because the claimant was not damaged while he was in Texas...so Texas courts shouldn't have authority.
I mostly agree with you (written for media, does not look like much of a case, no actual damages to Woods, etc.), though note this is a federal district court, not a Texas state court.
 
This is written for the media, not for the court. Most of it can easily be shown to be inaccurate or misrepresented pretty easily. They can also show that the bulk of the 60 positive cases in student athletes were because those kids didn't follow protocols and went and partied together.

Even if there was a basis, I think big pieces of it are irrelevant because the claimant was not damaged while he was in Texas...so Texas courts shouldn't have authority.
Woods raises federal questions of law, so the US District Court has jurisdiction and Woods' permanent residence is in the district.
 
I mostly agree with you (written for media, does not look like much of a case, no actual damages to Woods, etc.), though note this is a federal district court, not a Texas state court.
Missed that detail. I still think it's a big stretch to show he was damaged though. Seems to me that his own conduct separated him from the team, and I'm sure there's something in the contract he references about behavior and acting as a representative of the program/university.

Sadly, I'm certain that if this makes it past its initial review, the university will pay him to settle. Allowing it to go to trial keeps it in the news and continues to drag the university through the mud, so it'll be preferable to make a settlement and a non-disclosure agreement/gag order.
 
Missed that detail. I still think it's a big stretch to show he was damaged though. Seems to me that his own conduct separated him from the team, and I'm sure there's something in the contract he references about behavior and acting as a representative of the program/university.

Sadly, I'm certain that if this makes it past its initial review, the university will pay him to settle. Allowing it to go to trial keeps it in the news and continues to drag the university through the mud, so it'll be preferable to make a settlement and a non-disclosure agreement/gag order.
There is a reason most of the kids in the P12 distanced themselves from "playersunited or whatever it was called. It was a blatant cash-grab, "pay us or else we won't play", which at the time was against NCAA rules. IMHO, this is all Rolo/WSU needs to point out to show Wood$ created his own fate, not Rolo or the school.
 

Another one. I agree that Woods was and is being a jackass, but this is bad press. Pressure is mounting on Rolo and he better win big.
from the article : "...in a new era of player empowerment and social responsibility."

he forgot "paydays".

The future of college football is the same child worship that has ruined HS and summer league sports for the past two decades.
 
Last edited:
from the article : "...in a new era of player empowerment and social responsibility."

he forgot "paydays".

The future of college football if the same child worship that has ruined HS and summer league sports for the past two decades.

Agree that these kids don't realize that they are ruining the future for a lot of kids down the road in search of their "payday". I figure college football will cease to exist within my lifetime. At some point, it's all going to break down and universities are going to just cut their losses.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT