Apple Cup STAYS with WSU

[WaltherPPK]

NEVER sked the left of lib seattle trash again, EVER !

Keep the Cup because (1) Cougs won the LAST game, and (2) as a reminder of how the dog's left and tried to take all the money !

New voice of football tries to talk TOO much about any and everything - just STOP !

PAC 6 is a good start - must get UNLV, that's a MUST ! DO NOT go east of the Rockies for adders. Forget about Cal and Furd !

IF PAC must go into TX, take Texas State. Great start to the Coug 24 season !

 

[mikalalas]

NEVER sked the left of lib seattle trash again, EVER !

Keep the Cup because (1) Cougs won the LAST game, and (2) as a reminder of how the dog's left and tried to take all the money !

New voice of football tries to talk TOO much about any and everything - just STOP !

PAC 6 is a good start - must get UNLV, that's a MUST ! DO NOT go east of the Rockies for adders. Forget about Cal and Furd !

IF PAC must go into TX, take Texas State. Great start to the Coug 24 season !

Umm Texas State is not a bad way down list of back up choices. But Texas St is probably not going to add enough value.

The top choices, VALUE wise, is UNLV, but UNLV tied to the MWC BOTTOM DWELLER NEVADA, THAT HAS LITTLE TO NO VALUE.

Memphis, Tulane, Liberty(12-0, MAAC), UTSA, are the top choices.

If PAC 8 does not take, get the top choices, and instead gets Texas St, North Texas, etc, PAC 8 would be less attractive scheduling alliance partners with ACC, Big 12, and would get less CFP money, less media money, have less chance to merge with either ACC, Big 12, would get worse bowls, would be more like the BSU version of MWC, with Bottom Dwellers that would drag the conference, programs down, hold then back, etc, and would not be the best, premiere, semi hybrid P5 ish, G5, best of the rest conference.

Luckily the PAC 8 is going to try to get Memphis, Tulane, Liberty, UTSA, the top, best choices, instead of getting the lesser choices, like you seem to want.

 

[COUGinNCW]

Say (Hell) no to Liberty

 

[mikalalas]

Umm Texas State is not a bad way down list of back up choices. But Texas St is probably not going to add enough value.

The top choices, VALUE wise, is UNLV, but UNLV tied to the MWC BOTTOM DWELLER NEVADA, THAT HAS LITTLE TO NO VALUE.

Memphis, Tulane, Liberty(12-0, MAAC), UTSA, are the top choices.

If PAC 8 does not take, get the top choices, and instead gets Texas St, North Texas, etc, PAC 8 would be less attractive scheduling alliance partners with ACC, Big 12, and would get less CFP money, less media money, have less chance to merge with either ACC, Big 12, would get worse bowls, would be more like the BSU version of MWC, with Bottom Dwellers that would drag the conference, programs down, hold then back, etc, and would not be the best, premiere, semi hybrid P5 ish, G5, best of the rest conference.

Luckily the PAC 8 is going to try to get Memphis, Tulane, Liberty, UTSA, the top, best choices, instead of getting the lesser choices, like you seem to want.

Also getting Cal, SMU, if ACC falls apart, would be right to do because would add more value, more media deal money, more CFP money, better bowls, better bowl money, etc, and thats what matter most now is how conferences, college athletic programs, can stay relevant, make more money, etc.

Without making more money, that's how colleges end up in WAC, Big Sky, FCS, etc.

 

[mikalalas]

Say (Hell) no to Liberty

Liberty, James Madison are in the Sun Belt, MAAC, G5, and do consistently well, and have more value then Texas St, North Texas, UTSA, etc.

The only choices that have more value is UNLV, Memphis, Tulane.

Getting the Highest Value choices like Memphis, Tulane, UTSA, Liberty, James Madison, etc, is the most important thing