Against their 2 P5 opponents WSU has given up 1,025 yards, 353 of which was rushing.
Giving up an average of 512.5 yards per game, 176 of which are on the ground… That isn’t good defense. They’re playing very strong bend but don’t break redzone defense. They haven’t given up the points to reflect those yards yet. But it is concerning.
Wilcox knows how to shut down the air raid. Morris is gonna have his work cut out for him.
If the defense plays bend but don’t break..
WSU 21
Cal 20
If the defense gets gashed for another big day of 500+…
WSU 21
Cal 63
Against their 2 P5 opponents WSU has given up 1,025 yards, 353 of which was rushing.
Giving up an average of 512.5 yards per game, 176 of which are on the ground… That isn’t good defense. They’re playing very strong bend but don’t break redzone defense. They haven’t given up the points to reflect those yards yet. But it is concerning.
Wilcox knows how to shut down the air raid. Morris is gonna have his work cut out for him.
If the defense plays bend but don’t break..
WSU 21
Cal 20
If the defense gets gashed for another big day of 500+…
WSU 21
Cal 63
Welp, they won’t be running back multiple kickoffs for TDs, now that we can kick it through the end zone. So that may help keep it below 63.Most of those yards was against the best P5 O Line, Rushing Offense IN THE ENTIRE NATION.
WSU CONTAINED, semi kinda shut down Wisconsin a 1 of the best P5 O Line, rushing offense in the entire nation.
Cal's O Line is nowhere even remotely close to close to having a O Line, Rushing Attack, as good as Wiscy, Oregon.
Cal's O Line is SEMI BELOW AVERAGE AT BEST, OVERRATED.
WSU's defense is going to SACK Cal QB 2 to 4 to 6 times, and semi stuff, semi contain Cal RB enough.
Cal probably only scores 19.
Probably Worst Case, Cal probably only scores 29 composed of lots of FG's at worst
No way in Hell would Cal score 44+, more then Oregon, let alone 63.
And certainly not after what happened at Oregon, and certainly not at homecoming.
Now if the Cal game was after the Wiscy or Idaho game, and AT CAL, instead of Homecoming at WSU, then Cal might do as good or better then Oregon vs WSU
Your prediction of 63, etc, is BS.
Giving up 600+ yards of offense who needs kick returns for tds?Welp, they won’t be running back multiple kickoffs for TDs, now that we can kick it through the end zone. So that may help keep it below 63.
Giving up 600+ yards of offense who needs kick returns for tds?
One thing most forget is that Christian Mejia did not play against Oregon, his wife was in labor and he had a baby, so congratulations to him. Having Mejia in the game, one of our biggest D Lineman, might have made a difference in the 4th quarter versus Oregon. Cougs have done a great job of rotating the DL throughout the previous games, so missing one in the rotation takes its toll in the long run. So I do believe they play better versus the run this week. Wilcox always defended the air raid well., AZ put up 31 points on them, so it leads me to believe the D isn't as good as previous years. Looks like Cal has a little more offense, it will be a tight game, and the Cougs pull it out in the 4th quarter. Need to get back on the plus side of the turnovers.
One thing most forget is that Christian Mejia did not play against Oregon, his wife was in labor and he had a baby, so congratulations to him. Having Mejia in the game, one of our biggest D Lineman, might have made a difference in the 4th quarter versus Oregon. Cougs have done a great job of rotating the DL throughout the previous games, so missing one in the rotation takes its toll in the long run. So I do believe they play better versus the run this week. Wilcox always defended the air raid well., AZ put up 31 points on them, so it leads me to believe the D isn't as good as previous years. Looks like Cal has a little more offense, it will be a tight game, and the Cougs pull it out in the 4th quarter. Need to get back on the plus side of the turnovers.
Cal is a good team. They should have beat ND in South Bend. It will be a different style of game.
I like the Cougs at home in this one, but I think it's going to something like 21-17 Cougs.
Wilcox will do what he did against Leach...drop 8 ...low scoring game. Wilcox has had a lot of success playing the air raid.Offense gets vertical and Cougs bounce back
35-24 Cougs
It’s homecoming. Weather nice again. 230 start. If the crowd is significantly smaller…well, we should build a bigger stadium! I kid, but I fully expect the place to empty at halftime as usual I’ll be there the full 60 as usual and will get my drink on before and after.I expect a (much) smaller crowd Saturday with a lot less energy and feel a let down is fairly likely after such a tough loss. The bending, not breaking may fall apart, especially if they lack a little juice. I think it will be about a FG difference so I’ll go with the Cougs at home.
27-24.
Wilcox will do what he did against Leach...drop 8 ...low scoring game. Wilcox has had a lot of success playing the air raid.
Yeah Dickert won’t care about throwing it if we are getting 6-7 a pop on the ground. And if Ward doesn’t take it his ass will get chewed out. If they play that style w 7 DBs we will run all over them.And when Wilcox, rushes 3, drops 8, and only has 3,4,5 in Box, which will be most of the game, WSU, Eric, Dickert, Watson, Jenkins will RUN THE BALL about 46 to 49% of the time, SEMI KINDA SEMI GASHING Wilcox's rush 3, drop 8 defense.
DICKERT, ERIC IS NOT MIKE LEACH, AND DOES NOT, IS NOT THE MIKE LEACH AIR RAID.
I know that facts don’t really play a big part in your analysis, but Oregon’s rushing offense wasn’t the problem…or at least, not the biggest problem.Again that 600+ yards of offense and the lots of rushing yards, was against the BEST O LINE, RUSHING OFFENSE in the entire nation.
OF COURSE A ALABAMA NATIONAL CHAMPION, BEST O LINE, BEST RUSH ATTACK IN THE ENTIRE NATION IN ALL OF COLLEGE FOOTBALLDOM TYPE, A ALABAMA, OREGON, WISCY, is going to put up 600+ yards on WSU.
You can't go by that because the other Pac 12 P5 colleges are nowhere even remotely close to close to being close to as good as Oregon, Alabama, Wiscy, Ohio State, etc, O Line, Rushing attack.
Also WSU CONTAINED SEMI KINDA OF SEMI KIND OF SEMI SHUT DOWN WISCONSIN'S TOP OL, RUSHING ATTACK.
Also if WSU were to give up 600+ yards to UW, Stanford, Cal, Oregon St, Arizona, ASU, UCLA, etc, then you can be worried that WSU's defense would do the same vs Cal, etc.
But if WSU gives up 600+ yards vs Oregon, Alabama, Ohio State, maybe USC, etc, then you have to throw that out, and not be worried about WSU giving up 500+, lots of yards vs a weak Pac 12 offense like Cal, ASU, Arizona, Colorado, etc.
I know that facts don’t really play a big part in your analysis, but Oregon’s rushing offense wasn’t the problem…or at least, not the biggest problem.
We gave up 446 yards through the air against Oregon. Nix completed 75% of his passes. 75%. They had 11 receivers with a catch, 4 of them with 5+ catches, and 6 with a long over 20 yards (3 of those over 40). This means we didn’t cover anyone.
The ducks also had 178 yards on the ground, which is nothing to sneeze at, but it’s not what beat us….although their 5.6 yard average also means we didn’t defend the run very well either. But the rushing attack that was the bigger problem was ours. Our 53 yards and 2.1 average means we were one dimensional. But, if we’d been the least bit capable of defending the pass, we win that game.
I know that facts don’t really play a big part in your analysis, but Oregon’s rushing offense wasn’t the problem…or at least, not the biggest problem.
We gave up 446 yards through the air against Oregon. Nix completed 75% of his passes. 75%. They had 11 receivers with a catch, 4 of them with 5+ catches, and 6 with a long over 20 yards (3 of those over 40). This means we didn’t cover anyone.
The ducks also had 178 yards on the ground, which is nothing to sneeze at, but it’s not what beat us….although their 5.6 yard average also means we didn’t defend the run very well either. But the rushing attack that was the bigger problem was ours. Our 53 yards and 2.1 average means we were one dimensional. But, if we’d been the least bit capable of defending the pass, we win that game.
We don’t know if Oregon is a good team yet. That’s the grain of salt here.The RUN and Oregon's OL and PLAY ACTION PASS SET UP BY Oregon's RUN, OL, made it extremely hard for WSU to defend the Pass.
If WSU had defended, shut down the run well, good, then WSU would have defended the pass better.
Oregon's 178 rushing yards, 5.6 yards per carry GASSED, TIRED, WORE OUT WSU'S ability to defend the Pass.
Oregon is KNOWN, FAMOUS FOR, HAS A TOP BEST O LINE, RUSHING ATTACK IN THE NATION STATISTICALLY.
Yes Oregon Technically had more passing yards then rushing yards vs WSU, but make no mistake, it was Oregon's top rated OL, Rushing attack, that made it so that WSU's defense could NOT get any pressure, hurries, sacks vs Oregon's OL, QB, gave Oregon's QB, ALL DAY TO THROW, and SET UP OREGON'S PLAY ACTION PASS that hurt WSU.
Take away Oregon's top rated O Line, Rushing attack, and Oregon's passing attack wouldn't have done good vs WSU.
It was Oregon's Top O Line and Rushing attack that was responsible for everything.
That game was way more lopsided than the 26 point final spread. We coulda scored 100.The only allowable prediction this weekend is:
WSU 63 Cal 37
![]()
California at Washington State Box Score, October 18, 1997 | College Football at Sports-Reference.com
California at Washington State Box Score, October 18, 1997www.sports-reference.com
Ah, the Steve Gleason high-5s the ref gameThe only allowable prediction this weekend is:
WSU 63 Cal 37
![]()
California at Washington State Box Score, October 18, 1997 | College Football at Sports-Reference.com
California at Washington State Box Score, October 18, 1997www.sports-reference.com