The guy choose a coach with a style he wanted to play. He was the first coach to approach Grill and offer a scholarship Grill wanted to play a fast game in a winning system which would make full use of his many talents..The truth hurts i guess? The best bet for the cougs is that the current group of players stay and fashion a winning record. That would probably occurred under Kent with the new players coming in. Success builds success and fans are hoping that happens. Many of the current players came because they wanted to play an open and faster game or perhaps"rat ball" as you call it. I feel badly for a few of them who have little choice but to stay and play slo ball under the new coach They rounded them up and scheduled drills which is mandatory to keep their scholarships. In the very near future I think that many higher graded recruit able players will avoid Pullman not only because of the lack of facilities but also the style posters here want them to play .Be ready for many of the 2 star rated recruits whom certain fans here made fun of their abilities and ratings.You better hope that the new coach can evaluate and pick the better 2 star rated players.
1. Your saying that if players stay, win with new coach, Kent would have won with them is wrong.
From a talent standpoint, thats theoretically yes. But Kent had these talented players last season with the weakest most pathetic schedule in hiatory, and still only won 9,10,11 games.
Kent should have won 14 to 19 games last season. New coach would have. Coach K would have gotten 16 to 21 wins. So because of that Kent only getting 9,10,11 wins, shows that he would only get 8 to 12 wins next season. While new coach would get 13 to 20+ wins if players stay, and coach K would get 15,16,15.5 to 21+ wins.
Smith's record, and his many CREDIBLE ACCOLADES, ENDORSEMENTS, speaks for itself.
Also just because Smith was under slower ball Randy Bennet, doesnt mean Smith is slower ball.
Smith is between Randy Bennet, Tony Bennet, slowball, fast ball.
He is analytical, smart. He pushes it(Fast ball)with, when has advantage, with good passing, offensive flow, ball handling, without turning ball over, etc.
He slows it down, when doesnt have advantage, cant outfast the other team, cant maintain good ball control, reduce turnovers, etc, and instead slows it down, everybody moves, screens, pick and roll, triangle, princeton offenses, passing, driving, posting up inside, good outside open shots outside, good rebounding, good defense.
In other words he has a good Halfcourt offense. Halfcourt offense does not mean slow too. Halfcourt offense can be fast too.
Heck even coach K, duke doesnt run, gun all the time and slows it down for half court offense. Coach K, Duke isnt slow, or fast. In fact, in many ways coach K of duke is very much like Smith.
And Coach K of Duke is not viewed as too slow. Just like Tony is not viewed as too slow by players.
And Smith is not viewed by players as too slow.
In fact Smith has recruited plenty of top college, NBA like players who didnt think Smith was too slow, like Patty Mills, others.
So your being rediculous. Just like a couple, few were being rediculous, negative about the Leach hire, your being negative about Smith, another Leach like hire
So your wrong.
And you dont know what your talking about.
And you have no credibility.
And I will listen to Steve Kerr, Aand the GM of the Cleve Cavs, and Klay of the NBA, and Tony Bennet, and former coaches, players, etc, who are more authoritative, know what they are ralking about, that say Smith is a awesome hire, who are more credible then you, over you saying smith is a bad coach.
In fact I would be willing to put money on it, but since I dont gamble, I will literally eat my words if I am wrong, and am willing to do a challenge where loser literally eats both my words and your words.
Also warning out of the 3,4,5,6,7 times I have said I will literally eat my words if wrong, I have always ended up being right and not having to eat my words.
In other words you will probably lose and have to literally eat your words.