ADVERTISEMENT

Collin Klein

BiggsCoug

Hall Of Fame
Feb 5, 2003
20,547
4,896
113
When he was at the Heisman ceremony doing his interview he spoke about his high school football coach. Apparently the coach sat his entire team down with pen and paper and asked them to answer this question.

"What is the least you are willing to accept?"

When I think of what WSU's brand of football should be, I don't think the wheel needs to be reinvented. I think you take what Leach does on offense and you add in what Jim Harbaugh did at Stanford. JH is the only guy in recent history to resurrect a dead program.

WSU's brand, IMO, should be all day tough, hit you in the teeth, physical/punishing/ultimate effort football for 60 minutes. Whatever scheme you wanna run, fine. But make for damn sure the other team knows they were in a fight when the game is over.

I know that kids make mistakes. I know coaches can make mistakes too. What I have a hard time with is watching the zombies. No intensity, no effort, no sense of urgency, no one out there doing anything to make the other team quit.

Also, you fill your roster with kids that stay and grind. The revolving door at WSU has to stop. No more kids in the program for a month or a year or two years and then gone. The retention rate at WSU has to be 70% or better. If you wanna compete with 4 and 5 star talent that other schools have, you need to take your 2 and 3 star guys and bury them in your program for 4 years. Get them coached up, get them schemed up, get them muscled up. Get them on the field with so much coaching under their belt that you can run complicated schemes that confuse a true frosh QB from UCLA. Get your backs strong enough so when you do sling it to them in the flat the other team needs 3 guys there to stop him.

The least these kids and coaches are willing to accept is embarrassing. I dunno if this was the worst loss in school history, but you can see it from here.
 
Good thoughts Biggs. We keep hearing we are tough, work hard, etc. Yesterday didn't back up those words and even worse it didn't appear we even wanted to play. The toughness and direction also needs to come from the leaders on the team and I have no idea who that player or group of players is at this point.
 
I was never optimistic that the Air Raid could take us to the promised land. BCS bowl games, sure, after a half-decade or more. But gimmick offense like that of Oregon's, Baylor's and Tech's have shown us that at the end of the day, the old school shore-up-the-lines-and-run-it-down-your-throat (and prevent you from running it down ours) formula wins championships.

But I didn't think that we would be back to Wulffian depths in Year 4 with Leach. A .500 season would not be a victory this year, and even that seems way out of reach already.

Do we need a Mad Scientist to overhaul our program and produce the football equivalent of the Usual Suspects, or do we just need a half-decade learning the ropes under a Bear Bryant reincarnate? At their best, did Stanford, Alabama, or in the NFL Pittsburgh or Seattle or Baltimore, ever rely on Copperfield-esque magic? Or did they just play sound, disciplined, assignment football?
 
I don't think Leach has delivered WSU to the depths that Coach T did. Unlike Coach T, Leach has delivered victories against SC on the road. And a bowl game. So to compare the two isn't entirely fair. However, Leach does deserve a large heaping of humility and criticism for this loss to PSU.

I don't think it matters what the scheme is, just hit people. Hit them hard, hit them again every snap. Just keep being physical and do your job. If you get beat, I think a lot of Coug fans would be able to stomach a loss if they watched the kids fight like hell and go down swinging.
 
Biggs, I think your hit'em hard is right on. PSU coach said that exactly what he told his kids to do,play blue collar tough football and it worked over the entire second half as they won the line of scrimmage
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT