Sounds like the kid made a name for himself at the Senior Bowl. Happy for him he’s probably gonna be an early day two guy. Im not a big Seahawks or NFL guy but would be stoked to root for him on the Seahawks.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
They sure could use a lineback or three. Love Henley at the college level, but not sure if he's an NFL starter. If the Hawks get him, I'd love to be proven wrong.Sounds like the kid made a name for himself at the Senior Bowl. Happy for him he’s probably gonna be an early day two guy. Im not a big Seahawks or NFL guy but would be stoked to root for him on the Seahawks.
Tankathon has recently put Henley in their rankings, #6 out of 6 LB's in their rankings. They show him going at #84, just a couple picks after the Seahawks 3rd round pick (Tennessee QB). They have the Hawks taking a linebacker at #38 in second round, Drew Sanders from Arkansas, 6'5", 233#. For quite a while they had Noah Sewell going in that #38 slot.They sure could use a lineback or three. Love Henley at the college level, but not sure if he's an NFL starter. If the Hawks get him, I'd love to be proven wrong.
They sure could use a lineback or three. Love Henley at the college level, but not sure if he's an NFL starter. If the Hawks get him, I'd love to be proven wrong.
The knock on him that I’ve read is that he’s a beat slow in play recognition. He’s athletic enough that it hasn’t been a hindrance in college, but there’s question whether he’ll be effective at the next level. Enough question that teams aren’t likely to gamble on him until the 3rd round.I'm in the same boat. I loved his energy and character but question that he's actually an early round guy...but hey, I hope he goes high and has a great career. He's a great representative for WSU and I hope he tears it up.
I think he’s seen as a bit of a tweener. An outside backer body who’s been playing in the middle. I see a damn good football player. Linebackers who can cover are valuable in todays NFL. Should be a 2nd rounder I’d think. Hopefully the week he’s had propelled him up some draft boards.The 3rd-4th round projections I keep seeing for Henley are head scratching. Wonder if it's just an age thing, but similar to Abe last year it's hard to see him not being an impact player next year. Figure someone would want to add a player who instantly upgrades the roster.
Why should he be a first round pick? Third to fourth seems about right to me.The 3rd-4th round projections I keep seeing for Henley are head scratching. Wonder if it's just an age thing, but similar to Abe last year it's hard to see him not being an impact player next year. Figure someone would want to add a player who instantly upgrades the roster.
2023 NFL Draft: Ranking the top 10 linebacker prospects | NFL Draft | PFF
PFF's Mike Renner reveals his top 10 linebacker prospects in the 2023 NFL Draft.www.pff.com
Has him ranked the #4 2023 LB draft prospect.
In looking at other linebackers in the draft, not many have good coverage skills. Henley is among the better ones. His stock has definitely risen because of his Senior Bowl week performance.
Glad Cougar
Didn’t really man up with anyone outside of RBs out of the backfield. Normally as a middle backer you wouldn’t be, especially in the Pac-12.
Now, the video is full of plays where he shows excellent tackling skills, great recovery and closure rates and a lot of really great plays, but I'm not buying that he is all that good in coverage. I'd love to have someone post some videos where he is running with receivers and really showing off great coverage skills. I know that can be tough because the camera tends to focus on the pocket until the throw is released though.
FWIW, these guys agree with me:
Again, even though I'm not sold on the notion that he's great in coverage, he is the very definition of a "ball player" and any team would be lucky to have him on their squad for his energy and competitive nature alone.
FWIW, I just don't get the comments about his ability to cover receivers in space. Below is a 5 1/2 minute long highlight film and there is only one "highlight" where he actually ran along with a receiver and while it was a nice interception, the Idaho QB threw into triple coverage and Henley was the underneath guy in the position to make the pick (0:55 mark). Out of the dozens of other highlight plays, there was only one other one (at 3:08) where he sort of ran along but he was beaten by the receiver and had his back to the QB trying to catch up. He did a good job of putting his hands up and disrupting the pass though. The other times in coverage, he basically squatted in a zone and reacted as the pass was being thrown.
Didn’t really man up with anyone outside of RBs out of the backfield. Normally as a middle backer you wouldn’t be, especially in the Pac-12.
My comment on this was based more on what we were seeing from him during Sr bowl week and his range in general. He’s athletic enough to cover wide receivers in space. That’s not common at that position.
If he does well at the combine it could get interesting. He checks all the boxes on the field IMO.
I'm going to attribute much of this to coaching. If someone is athletic/quick/fast "enough" they can be coached up to be better in coverage. Outside of our corners last year (and not consistently) nobody back there last year was very good in coverage.Interesting to see that Henley was guilty of "enhancing" his height. The PFF ranking says that he is 6'2" but he measured more than an inch less than that at the Senior Bowl. Not that unusual of course.
FWIW, I just don't get the comments about his ability to cover receivers in space. Below is a 5 1/2 minute long highlight film and there is only one "highlight" where he actually ran along with a receiver and while it was a nice interception, the Idaho QB threw into triple coverage and Henley was the underneath guy in the position to make the pick (0:55 mark). Out of the dozens of other highlight plays, there was only one other one (at 3:08) where he sort of ran along but he was beaten by the receiver and had his back to the QB trying to catch up. He did a good job of putting his hands up and disrupting the pass though. The other times in coverage, he basically squatted in a zone and reacted as the pass was being thrown.
Now, the video is full of plays where he shows excellent tackling skills, great recovery and closure rates and a lot of really great plays, but I'm not buying that he is all that good in coverage. I'd love to have someone post some videos where he is running with receivers and really showing off great coverage skills. I know that can be tough because the camera tends to focus on the pocket until the throw is released though.
FWIW, these guys agree with me:
Again, even though I'm not sold on the notion that he's great in coverage, he is the very definition of a "ball player" and any team would be lucky to have him on their squad for his energy and competitive nature alone.
Yup. I’d say the chiefs did alright snagging Watson where they did last year too. If you did a redraft he’d be a 2nd probably.As much as anything, he is a ball player with a great build. He definitely deserves a decent draft position. I don't see him going before the third or fourth, but someone is going to be glad to get him whenever they do pull the trigger.
One of Seattle’s biggest needs is linebacker. I’d think he is on their radar.Here's an interesting twist - one of the knocks on Henley used to be his coverage skills. This article says "it seemed pretty clear that Henley was the best linebacker in coverage at this year’s Senior Bowl" "it was Henley’s abilities in pass coverage that stood out more than his run-stopping capacity" and "Daiyan Henley has real potential to be a three-down contributor at the position with his skills in coverage on passing downs as well as the explosiveness and physicality he brings on every play."
https://thedraftnetwork.com/daiyan-henley-senior-bowl-2023-nfl-draft/
There's a brief mention on ESPN from Kiper, suggesting that Henley may now be a 2nd rounder.
He's got good ball instincts and he comes to play on every down. On effort alone, I'd take him in the 2nd. But between his size and his style of play, I still question how long he'll last in the league...so I guess it would depend on what other needs my team had - and how many picks - whether I'd take him that high.
Seattle picks 6th & 21st in the 2nd round (38 & 53 overall), and then not again until 20th in the 3rd (84th overall). Considering what else they need, taking Henley at 53 is probably a stretch. But if he's still on the board at 84 they'd be nuts not to give him serious consideration.
He has a nose for the ball for sure, but as someone else mentioned, his instincts seem to be lagging.As much as anything, he is a ball player with a great build. He definitely deserves a decent draft position. I don't see him going before the third or fourth, but someone is going to be glad to get him whenever they do pull the trigger.