ADVERTISEMENT

Didn't realize this about UW...

How_did_this_happen?

Hall Of Fame
Gold Member
Nov 3, 2012
6,996
1,659
113
17. Washington Huskies (9-2)
The Huskies suffer from “they ain’t beat nobody” as they’re only 2-2 against teams with winning records and it’s not like those two wins — Fresno State and Oregon — are particularly impressive. It also doesn’t help that UW only beat Utah because Kyle Whittingham channeled Jon Embree in his clock management.

What say ye ALLCAPS?
 
  • Like
Reactions: chipdouglas
17. Washington Huskies (9-2)
The Huskies suffer from “they ain’t beat nobody” as they’re only 2-2 against teams with winning records and it’s not like those two wins — Fresno State and Oregon — are particularly impressive. It also doesn’t help that UW only beat Utah because Kyle Whittingham channeled Jon Embree in his clock management.

What say ye ALLCAPS?

After last night, I think Kyle channeled Pete Carroll in his clock (and timeout and fake field goal) management. Just sayin' :p
 
17. Washington Huskies (9-2)
The Huskies suffer from “they ain’t beat nobody” as they’re only 2-2 against teams with winning records and it’s not like those two wins — Fresno State and Oregon — are particularly impressive. It also doesn’t help that UW only beat Utah because Kyle Whittingham channeled Jon Embree in his clock management.

What say ye ALLCAPS?
Sorry for the delay. Yup, 2-2 against teams with winning records. That's what they've been thrown. The two losses each by one score. One on a short week. Both on the road. It's interesting how all of a sudden it's the time-out that Whittingham called that cost Utah the game. UW wouldn't have won in OT? Let's apply more wizzu logic (which conveniently gets ignored)........What if UW had made a PAT earlier in the game? What if UW had made a 30 yard FG earlier in the game? What if UW had not gotten caught with their pants down on an on-side kick in the first quarter that resulted in three points for Utah? What if UW had not gotten caught with their pants down on a fake punt on 4th and 17 which resulted in seven points? Wow - that's 14 points right there (the PAT, FG, onside-kick, and fake punt). Won by three points. Just execute a tiny bit and pay attention then you're looking at a 17 point win. Spread was 17.5.
More wizzu logic (which conveniently gets ignored)......wizzu beat BSU (because BSU couged-it), USC, and Stanford. All at home. All by three whopping points. USC had tons of injuries. USC was on a short week (look at how well road P12 teams fared on weekdays this year). Was Love fully healthy?.....dunno for sure. Beat UO in their first full game without Herbert. Got drilled in their two losses.
How convenient the wizzu spin is for ya.
 
Kevin, if some fans talking about their matchup on their own board triggers you enough to write an angry essay, re-evaluate your life. It's college sports, don't identify so closely with 19 year olds.

But when he's only 14 ...
 
Kevin, if some fans talking about their matchup on their own board triggers you enough to write an angry essay, re-evaluate your life. It's college sports, don't identify so closely with 19 year olds.
I could be wrong, but didn't Loyal Coug ask for my opinion? Think before you write.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT