I haven’t got to the end of the threads yet so maybe someone mentioned this, but the school or anyone associated with the school including past boosters or donators cannot be involved in these NIL deals. I am hearing a lot of Chun should or Rolo questions, which is the only thing that remains illegal to my knowledge.
This is partially true, untrue.
A NIL deal has to come from a theoretically independent of the college, business, or a individual that wants to theoretically legitimately hire the student athlete to use their name, image, likeness to promote, advertise the business, etc.
A college, donor, booster, etc, cant directly hire, do a NIL deal, FOR THE COLLEGE, IN THE NAME of the college. It has to theoretically be a independent of the college, legit deal.
I use THEORETICALLY for a reason. A Fan, booster, donor could theoretically own a legit business, and legitly want to hire a Student Athlete's NIL. Thats 100% allowable under the rule, according to courts, NCAA, etc.
Also A college President, AD, Coach, Fan, Booste, etc, can help find theoretical legit NIL deals for student athletes from theoretical legitly independent sources. That's 100% allowable by the rules.
But even if it were to be against the rules, its real easy to game the system, and almost impossible to enforce, as who's to say what, which business, LLC, etc, that whether owned by fans, boosters, donors, etc, or by Nike, etc, is legit or not, or is legitly hiring student athletes NIL or not.
And if the NCAA were to say a fan, booster, donor, cant hire a student athlete's NIL, that fan, booster, donor, could easily go cry to the courts "You the courts, said that Student Athlete's can hire out their NIL, and the NCAA is trying to stop that by not letting us hire a Student Athlete's NIL."