This is neither an indictment or endorsement of Kent, just an observstion and question.
If I had a dollar for every post that talks about systems and Kent needing players for his system that you cant get to Pullman, or some type of system that can can win in Pullman I would be rich.
My question is what type of system doesnt do better with tall fast guys who can shoot. I know you dont win with short slow guys who cant shoot. They can't score or defend against the former.
Kents former teams were bad defensively because they didnt have the athleticism to defend at this level. This team was bad defensively because they were young and new to the program not because they werent long and athletic.
If I had a dollar for every post that talks about systems and Kent needing players for his system that you cant get to Pullman, or some type of system that can can win in Pullman I would be rich.
My question is what type of system doesnt do better with tall fast guys who can shoot. I know you dont win with short slow guys who cant shoot. They can't score or defend against the former.
Kents former teams were bad defensively because they didnt have the athleticism to defend at this level. This team was bad defensively because they were young and new to the program not because they werent long and athletic.