May I summarize? My own words, but I think supported by much of this thread.
The offense gets an A-, or at worst a B+. Definitely good enough to win in the PAC. We would all like a little better 3rd down conversion numbers. There is a case to be made that the more touches Borghi gets, the better we do, but it appears that those touches are close to equally effective whether run or pass. It appears that the staff is well prepared and makes good in-game decisions, though there are a few clock management related situations that I'd bet Leach would like to have back for a do over. Clock management has never been his strength.
The defense overall gets somewhere between a C- at best and a D at worst. They occasionally make a big play, but they have had a hard time following that up with enough consistency to end a drive. They play portions of games at a much better level; probably a solid B (parts of the Oregon game are an example); but they have a hard time putting together a full game. I will say that for the most part the staff is prepared. The in-game decisions on the other hand, especially at the end when they have to stop that last opposing drive have been poor. The last drive performance for UCLA, ASU and Oregon rated an F and cost us a game that we were leading at that point. When you have had success for an entire game with a particular D strategy and you chuck it all for the last drive to play a prevent D and hand the other team chunks of yardage on every play, then the staff has to recognize that they have failed the kids. Let the kids stay with what has had some success, and they will either win or lose doing what they have been doing well. Don't drop into a crappy version of a prevent and rely on the other team to make mistakes, since short of that you are giving away the game.
