Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
31 consecutive points.Minshew is looking very, very average. The return of Zombie Falk?
It will probably need to31 points is a gpod outing The offense will come alive against Arizona and score over 42 points.
Minshew is looking very, very average. The return of Zombie Falk?
Disagree on #4–I felt they were only giving 92-94.5% effort.1. The high altitude, winds, bad weather, was making it extremely difficult to pass accurately take advantage of opportunities missed.
2. Even when Minshew was accurate, despite bad weather, high altitude, etc, the WR's had a small, moderate case of the dropsies, on KEY plays, opportunities.
3. WSU ran it more then usual
4. Colorado desperate to not lose its 5th in a row, tried its absolute hardest to shut down Minshew, WR's.
DESPITE ALL OF THE ABOVE COMBINED Minshew still managed to pass for ABOUT 300, 350, 385 yards 2,3 TD's, 1,2 rushing TD's, and managed to GAME MANAGE, LEAD TEAM TO 31 THIRTY ONE POINTS, TO 7, 24, TWENTY FOUR POINT BLOWOUT WIN DESPITE ALL THE ABOVE.
Minshew didnt turn the ball over, didnt throw interceptions. Didnt force things.
HE TOOK WHAT THE DEFENSE, HIS PASS DROPPING WR'S,HIS RB'S, PLAYS, ETC, GAVE HIM.
And that is far more important then to only pass for 435 yards, 4,5 TD's,3 Ints, 2 fumbles, etc, in a LOSS.
MINSHEW IS A WINNER, AND FINDS WAYS TO WIN, AND THATS THE MOST IMPORTANT THING AND TRAIT IN A HEISMAN CANDIDATE.
Well, none other than Brock Huard would disagree with your "periodic gusts of wind" characterization. He felt the QB's were greatly affected by the wind. I notice Montez was less than stellar as well.I was at the game and want to clear up a few things after reading them about 5x:
Overall CU came in with a good gameplan and executed it well. But with injuries, then a loss to targeting, then to being on the field because of the dink and dunk for 40 minutes, they got worn down and couldn't contain us - so we broke it open.
- Weather: The weather was not "bad". It was sunny and in the 50s most of the day. No rain, no thunder, no freezing temps - great fall day
- Altitude: I'm no physicist but I don't think altitude explains anything. It helps a 58-yard range kicker hit 60, but it's Boulder, not the MOON
- Wind: Wind was a factor but not as much as people keep saying. 85% of the time it was fine; periodically gusts of wind would pick up which definitely affected a couple of throws, but even that was a tiny minority of throws. It doesn't explain nearly as much as people think
I also think if the officiating were reversed, we would [rightly] be chalking this up as another anti-WSU game. This is the first game this season where I feel like we were getting the SC treatment - and I loved it!
I heard Brock getting a little choked up about Minshew today when talking about the Heisman. Is that allowed?? It was messing with my head a little bit.Well, none other than Brock Huard would disagree with your "periodic gusts of wind" characterization. He felt the QB's were greatly affected by the wind. I notice Montez was less than stellar as well.
Well, far be it from me to challenge the sterling reputation of Husky Brock Huard, but I was essentially on the field (couple rows back) and he was in a windproof press box.Well, none other than Brock Huard would disagree with your "periodic gusts of wind" characterization. He felt the QB's were greatly affected by the wind. I notice Montez was less than stellar as well.
suI was at the game and want to clear up a few things after reading them about 5x:
Overall CU came in with a good gameplan and executed it well. But with injuries, then a loss to targeting, then to being on the field because of the dink and dunk for 40 minutes, they got worn down and couldn't contain us - so we broke it open.
- Weather: The weather was not "bad". It was sunny and in the 50s most of the day. No rain, no thunder, no freezing temps - great fall day
- Altitude: I'm no physicist but I don't think altitude explains anything. It helps a 58-yard range kicker hit 60, but it's Boulder, not the MOON
- Wind: Wind was a factor but not as much as people keep saying. 85% of the time it was fine; periodically gusts of wind would pick up which definitely affected a couple of throws, but even that was a tiny minority of throws. It doesn't explain nearly as much as people think
I also think if the officiating were reversed, we would [rightly] be chalking this up as another anti-WSU game. This is the first game this season where I feel like we were getting the SC treatment - and I loved it!
su
Not doubting your assessment, but which calls that went WSU's way were not justified? Replays seemed to show that corrected calls and replay booth reversals were correct. What SC treatment did we get?
Glad Cougar
Well, far be it from me to challenge the sterling reputation of Husky Brock Huard, but I was essentially on the field (couple rows back) and he was in a windproof press box.
100% he would have noticed gusts of wind, but I had infant children with me out there who - believe me - would not have lasted 4 hours in anything other than "periodic gusts of wind".
The things I kept reading here and on Brand Y about the "bad weather" and the wind was a surprise to me, and would have been to the other thousands of people going about their business around me.
The whole world is talking about his season 4th qtr stats. He had a little too much on his throws in the first half....In his interview, he said he didn’t want to make any excuses, he should hit open receivers. Yes, he’s human. His 60% completetion percentage wasn’t far off from Will Grier or Tua. In fact Tua, was 14-21 1TD and 1int. If the Heisman is given to the most important player to a top 12 team, would Alabama skip a beat with Hurst at QB? Minshew is the most important player in college football and it isn’t even close.
Minshew ain’t gonna win. But he can get to New York. I don’t think today hurt or helped him. He didn’t go ohh but he had 3 TDS and Cougs dominated.I think he hasn’t done anything to diminish his stock. Tua’s stats weren’t that great today and he threw an Int.
I expect Georgia to give him problems.
As I said earlier the Apple Cup will be where Minshew separates himself.
yeah both the 4th down sideline throw to Patmon and the double pass were blatant PI that should have been flagged. The fact they didn’t call any BS PI calls on us though I can live with it.We weren’t getting SC treatment but we weren’t getting screwed.
Minshew ain’t gonna win. But he can get to New York. I don’t think today hurt or helped him. He didn’t go ohh but he had 3 TDS and Cougs dominated.
Well, far be it from me to challenge the sterling reputation of Husky Brock Huard, but I was essentially on the field (couple rows back) and he was in a windproof press box.
100% he would have noticed gusts of wind, but I had infant children with me out there who - believe me - would not have lasted 4 hours in anything other than "periodic gusts of wind".
The things I kept reading here and on Brand Y about the "bad weather" and the wind was a surprise to me, and would have been to the other thousands of people going about their business around me.
1. The high altitude, winds, bad weather, was making it extremely difficult to pass accurately take advantage of opportunities missed.
2. Even when Minshew was accurate, despite bad weather, high altitude, etc, the WR's had a small, moderate case of the dropsies, on KEY plays, opportunities.
3. WSU ran it more then usual
4. Colorado desperate to not lose its 5th in a row, tried its absolute hardest to shut down Minshew, WR's.
DESPITE ALL OF THE ABOVE COMBINED Minshew still managed to pass for ABOUT 300, 350, 385 yards 2,3 TD's, 1,2 rushing TD's, and managed to GAME MANAGE, LEAD TEAM TO 31 THIRTY ONE POINTS, TO 7, 24, TWENTY FOUR POINT BLOWOUT WIN DESPITE ALL THE ABOVE.
Minshew didnt turn the ball over, didnt throw interceptions. Didnt force things.
HE TOOK WHAT THE DEFENSE, HIS PASS DROPPING WR'S,HIS RB'S, PLAYS, ETC, GAVE HIM.
And that is far more important then to only pass for 435 yards, 4,5 TD's,3 Ints, 2 fumbles, etc, in a LOSS.
MINSHEW IS A WINNER, AND FINDS WAYS TO WIN, AND THATS THE MOST IMPORTANT THING AND TRAIT IN A HEISMAN CANDIDATE.
Well you may be entirely correct but it also is important to keep in mind that winds in stadiums are not the same everywhere. You can be sitting in one section and the winds can be fairly calm, but in another section the wind is strong and swirling. That's even the case on the field. But also,wind patterns can be different in a stadium even 20 feet up. You were a couple rows up but for the long passes in the middle of the field the ball still gets some elevation and could be more likely to be buffeted by the wind. So I'm sure the wind played a factor. Though I thought Minshew was sometimes a little more hesitant than usual which perhaps also played a role.
As to the thread topic. This game won't hurt him. He is going to NYC unless he completely craps the last 2 games. Will he win? Probably not, even though I think he should based on how much of an impact he has had on our season.
Well, far be it from me to challenge the sterling reputation of Husky Brock Huard, but I was essentially on the field (couple rows back) and he was in a windproof press box.
100% he would have noticed gusts of wind, but I had infant children with me out there who - believe me - would not have lasted 4 hours in anything other than "periodic gusts of wind".
The things I kept reading here and on Brand Y about the "bad weather" and the wind was a surprise to me, and would have been to the other thousands of people going about their business around me.
Nice try.Wind at ground level / in the air above the stadium can be and typically is very different from what is observed in the stands.
Here’s a video showing c links wind dynamics.
Now here is the layout of the stadium in boulder.
From the image you can see how wind depending on direction can seem different in the stands vs on the field.
So depending on the wind direction and the wind dynamics it definitely can effect the ball in the air as well as the thinness of the air (less friction)
Nice try.
This video explains why wind might vary inside vs outside a stadium, as well as in pockets within the stadium depending on speed and direction. However, the Coug section had maximum wind exposure AND our guys were playing in every corner of the field for 3.5 hours so we were experiencing identical conditions much of the time AND we had it worse than the players more often than not. I was also mere feet above field level as I said, not way up “in the stands”
ANYONE ELSE WHO WATCHED THE GAME ON THEIR FLATSCREEN WANT TO TAKE A RUN AT THE GUY WHO WAS ACTUALLY THERE
Nice try.
This video explains why wind might vary inside vs outside a stadium, as well as in pockets within the stadium depending on speed and direction. However, the Coug section had maximum wind exposure AND our guys were playing in every corner of the field for 3.5 hours so we were experiencing identical conditions much of the time AND we had it worse than the players more often than not. I was also mere feet above field level as I said, not way up “in the stands”
ANYONE ELSE WHO WATCHED THE GAME ON THEIR FLATSCREEN WANT TO TAKE A RUN AT THE GUY WHO WAS ACTUALLY THERE
Let's level set here: saying "physics is physics" and posting YouTube videos you clearly didn't watch does not move this conversation forward.Physics is physics. Your frame of reference in the stands can and more than likely is not the same on the field or 10-20-30 yards in the air above the field.
Here’s a video on perspective regarding physics.
The wind affected a minority of throws. It did not change the outcome of the game. I ballparked that 15% of the game was gusts of wind. Not all occurred during throws. Fewer even than that affected throws.chipdouglas said:Wind was a factor but not as much as people keep saying
Let's level set here: saying "physics is physics" and posting YouTube videos you clearly didn't watch does not move this conversation forward.
I know it's asking a lot, but should anyone care to do the due diligence of reading my original post, you'll see:
The wind affected a minority of throws. It did not change the outcome of the game. I ballparked that 15% of the game was gusts of wind. Not all occurred during throws. Fewer even than that affected throws.
Very strange that a small handful of people who watched the game on their Samsung are so committed to disputing my firsthand account of being at the game. Tron points out the remote possibility of a different experience on the field, against which I offer plenty evidence to the contrary, and somehow we have equal credibility in terms of what it was like for me to be there 8 feet off the field, sometimes sitting 20-30 feet from the action. Anybody ever heard of Occam's Razor or is it strictly Infowars people?
Let's level set here: saying "physics is physics" and posting YouTube videos you clearly didn't watch does not move this conversation forward.
I know it's asking a lot, but should anyone care to do the due diligence of reading my original post, you'll see:
The wind affected a minority of throws. It did not change the outcome of the game. I ballparked that 15% of the game was gusts of wind. Not all occurred during throws. Fewer even than that affected throws.
Very strange that a small handful of people who watched the game on their Samsung are so committed to disputing my firsthand account of being at the game. Tron points out the remote possibility of a different experience on the field, against which I offer plenty evidence to the contrary, and somehow we have equal credibility in terms of what it was like for me to be there 8 feet off the field, sometimes sitting 20-30 feet from the action. Anybody ever heard of Occam's Razor or is it strictly Infowars people?
Let's level set here: saying "physics is physics" and posting YouTube videos you clearly didn't watch does not move this conversation forward.
I know it's asking a lot, but should anyone care to do the due diligence of reading my original post, you'll see:
The wind affected a minority of throws. It did not change the outcome of the game. I ballparked that 15% of the game was gusts of wind. Not all occurred during throws. Fewer even than that affected throws.
Very strange that a small handful of people who watched the game on their Samsung are so committed to disputing my firsthand account of being at the game. Tron points out the remote possibility of a different experience on the field, against which I offer plenty evidence to the contrary, and somehow we have equal credibility in terms of what it was like for me to be there 8 feet off the field, sometimes sitting 20-30 feet from the action. Anybody ever heard of Occam's Razor or is it strictly Infowars people?
Abraham Zapruder is in the house.