The only thing they care about is their money and maybe their existing media rights.
I sense this will get settled pretty quickly if the Beavs/Cougs are truly wanting to rebuild the conference and NOT grab a huge portion of the assets
Look, our only options are to join the Mountain West, or talk them in to dissolving and making it the Pac-16. And we just need to suck it up and get 'er done.The only thing they care about is their money and maybe their existing media rights.
I sense this will get settled pretty quickly if the Beavs/Cougs are truly wanting to rebuild the conference and NOT grab a huge portion of the assets.
I understand that and agree that's all we got at this point.Look, our only options are to join the Mountain West, or talk them in to dissolving and making it the Pac-16. And we just need to suck it up and get 'er done.
What WSU needs is money. As much as possible. Because the budget hit is going to be catastrophic.Look, our only options are to join the Mountain West, or talk them in to dissolving and making it the Pac-16. And we just need to suck it up and get 'er done.
I understand that and agree that's all we got at this point.
What WSU needs is money. As much as possible. Because the budget hit is going to be catastrophic.
Media deal at best in the new Pac-12 is going to be like 10M. Might be a bit more if it's "tiered."
I think you are getting the entire MWC. How big to you go with adding and AAC schools?If the PAC gets rebuilt with
SDSU, BSU, Fresno St, UNLV, Memphis, USF, Tulane, Rice, 1 ACC LEFTOVER, IF FSU blows up ACC, 1 of either Vandy, Iowa St, Minnesota, Iowa, Northwestern, Rutgers, Duke, and Gonzaga, UConn, Villanova, St Mary in Bball only.
IF that happened, WSU would get 18 mil to 24 mil per team, not 10 mil per team.
The only ways that only get 10 mil per team, is if WSU, OSU, join MWC, or WHOLE MWC, including the 1, couple, few, some SHT teams, join the PAC, instead of the PAC pick and choosing the best G5's to join the PAC
Isn't the prime reason for all the reverse merger talk is to theoretically control and preserve Pac-12 assets, that would otherwise be split 12 ways upon disbandment? So it is all about money and there is no way this is going to be settled quick unless WSU/OSU are willing to bend over and get F-ed twice over.The only thing they care about is their money and maybe their existing media rights.
I sense this will get settled pretty quickly if the Beavs/Cougs are truly wanting to rebuild the conference and NOT grab a huge portion of the assets.
Why exactly would any of those Big Ten schools leave the Big Ten for this rebuilt Pac, and where are you pulling those numbers from? None of this is close to accurate.If the PAC gets rebuilt with
SDSU, BSU, Fresno St, UNLV, Memphis, USF, Tulane, Rice, 1 ACC LEFTOVER, IF FSU blows up ACC, 1 of either Vandy, Iowa St, Minnesota, Iowa, Northwestern, Rutgers, Duke, and Gonzaga, UConn, Villanova, St Mary in Bball only.
IF that happened, WSU would get 18 mil to 24 mil per team, not 10 mil per team.
The only ways that only get 10 mil per team, is if WSU, OSU, join MWC, or WHOLE MWC, including the 1, couple, few, some SHT teams, join the PAC, instead of the PAC pick and choosing the best G5's to join the PAC
Why would it even be $10m? Current MWC deal is $4m with a little more for Boise. The current environment for sports rights is pretty bad. Is this based on an expectation Apple would pay for it? Good luck with that. If Stanford and Cal were still around, maybe. With WSU, Oregon State, and all that other stuff? Not happening.Media deal at best in the new Pac-12 is going to be like 10M. Might be a bit more if it's "tiered."
Why exactly would any of those Big Ten schools leave the Big Ten for this rebuilt Pac, and where are you pulling those numbers from? None of this is close to accurate.
Hawaii will get left out. Probably Wyoming or New Mexico too.I think you are getting the entire MWC. How big to you go with adding and AAC schools?
And the AQ status.Isn't the prime reason for all the reverse merger talk is to theoretically control and preserve Pac-12 assets, that would otherwise be split 12 ways upon disbandment? So it is all about money and there is no way this is going to be settled quick unless WSU/OSU are willing to bend over and get F-ed twice over.
Fer Gawd sakes - ignore anything old Mik posts.Why exactly would any of those Big Ten schools leave the Big Ten for this rebuilt Pac, and where are you pulling those numbers from? None of this is close to accurate.
For the MWC to dissolve and merge 9 school presidents have to agree. I can't see any school being left out voting for this. UNLV more than likely would not vote to kick Hawaii out. It would be a public relations nightmare. Hawaiian's consider Las Vegas as their 9th Island. You can Google search that if you think I pulled that out of my ass. There is a huge Hawaiian population living in Vegas and there are hotels that cater specifically to Hawaiian visitors. Besides, U of Hawaii pays travel subsidies for going to Hawaii.Hawaii will get left out. Probably Wyoming or New Mexico too.
they do care....I predict many west coast teams will get sick of the constant cross country traffic....The only thing they care about is their money and maybe their existing media rights.
I sense this will get settled pretty quickly if the Beavs/Cougs are truly wanting to rebuild the conference and NOT grab a huge portion of the assets.
They care about tradition in the same way Ed cares about tradition. 😆