ADVERTISEMENT

Mt west ready

longtimecoug

Hall Of Fame
Dec 22, 2002
7,139
948
113
She's kind of a honey. So I'm good with her. Maybe I need to go and negotiate the merger in person.
 
She certainly seems to have a more rational approach to all this than any of the other players.
 
Our entire roster would enter the Portal hoping to go elsewhere to P4 School. Asst Coaches too.

Don’t be fooled with being a big fish in a smaller pond.
Yeah this idea we’d be a big fish is laughable. You’re immediately on an equal playing field as everyone else. Our Pac football history means nothing in this scenario.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 425cougfan
The Horned Frogs went from a G5 to P5 only because of football. Big Cats & Beavers can do the same. You & Benny Beaver have to win in football more than want to win in football now.

defending%20big%2012%20champs_zpsrnmqmswn.png
 
As opposed to what? Dropping down to the Big Sky? Nobody other than the Mtn West wants us. We Cougs need to get our heads around this. I know it sucks, but it is what it is.
the only other possible option is limping along and hoping to add several schools to the pac, which may or may not be possible
 
The Horned Frogs went from a G5 to P5 only because of football. Big Cats & Beavers can do the same. You & Benny Beaver have to win in football more than want to win in football now.

defending%20big%2012%20champs_zpsrnmqmswn.png
WSU has been winning in football. And putting eyes in front of TV sets. And has built a national brand. Something that Arizona, Arizona State, and Colorado haven’t done. Try another narrative, all this one does is confirm we should have been invited to the party.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mikalalas
WSU may lose players and coaches initially, but we also have a FOB and soon a real IPF. We will compete just fine in that league after some adjustment pains.
 
  • Like
Reactions: WindyCityCoug
WSU may lose players and coaches initially, but we also have a FOB and soon a real IPF. We will compete just fine in that league after some adjustment pains.
I’m not saying we won’t compete just fine. I’m saying we aren’t going to show up and be the big bully on the block like some people here are implying. Hell in the past several years we’ve lost to FSU, BSU, Utah State, Colorado State. That was with a much richer TV revenue stream and the “prestige” of the Pac-12. The playing field will be level and we will be in the same battles we were with Utah and Oregon.
 
As opposed to what? Dropping down to the Big Sky? Nobody other than the Mtn West wants us. We Cougs need to get our heads around this. I know it sucks, but it is what it is.

Solution has been presented by LOTS HERE.

1. 9 MWC, vote to dissolve MWC.

2. take the best 7,8,9 of those teams, and add them to PAC

3. That gets you to about PAC 11,12,13

4. Add SMU, Memphis, USF, Tulane, Gonzaga.

5. Keep PAC 12 BRAND NAME, ASSETS.

6. Conference gets 1,2 CFP, 1,2 NY6, keeps P5 status, 2,3 NCAA tournament bids.

That is doable, and the MWC commish, and Majority of MWC supports that option.

Only way this doesn't get done, is if PAC 4/2 leadership too dumb, incompetent to do it, or if WSU/Ore St, either join Big 12, or ACC.
 
What we could use is a hefty NIL agreement to distribute $$ across all of our current student athletes to entice them to tough it out with us.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cougini5591
She's kind of a honey. Maybe I need to go and negotiate the merger in person.

"Hey there darling. The name's Loyal. Any place here where you and I can get a little alone time before we go and get this conference paperwork signed?"


Season 2 Pam GIF by Martin
 
I’m not saying we won’t compete just fine. I’m saying we aren’t going to show up and be the big bully on the block like some people here are implying. Hell in the past several years we’ve lost to FSU, BSU, Utah State, Colorado State. That was with a much richer TV revenue stream and the “prestige” of the Pac-12. The playing field will be level and we will be in the same battles we were with Utah and Oregon.

The only reason why WSU lost to those teams, was either because of anomalies, bad coaching, NIL, players sitting out for NFL, etc, IN BOWL GAMES.

6,7,8 times out of each 10 times that WSU play each of those teams, WSU wins.

WSU would finish in 1,2,3,4,5 place, about 3/5, 2/3, 3/4, 4/5 of the time.

WSU/Ore St, would be ONE, COUPLE, of SEMI BIG FISH TO BIG FISH TO SEMI BULLY TO BULLY, along with SDSU, BSU, Utah St, Fresno St
 
Stanford will be a p5 school they won't settle for anything less. Unlike the rest of the schools Stanford is concerned about their student athletes, which probably prevents them from going ACC, unless it is football only. Stanford might be our only hope to keep the Pac 12 alive, if they go, it is done.
 
  • Like
Reactions: WindyCityCoug
I’m not saying we won’t compete just fine. I’m saying we aren’t going to show up and be the big bully on the block like some people here are implying. Hell in the past several years we’ve lost to FSU, BSU, Utah State, Colorado State. That was with a much richer TV revenue stream and the “prestige” of the Pac-12. The playing field will be level and we will be in the same battles we were with Utah and Oregon.

Not really the same battles we were with against Utah and Oregon. When you look at athletic budgets, here is the breakdown for expenses by team for 2022:

Arizona: $125 million
Arizona State: $124 million
Cal: $115 million
CU: $95 million
Oregon: $141 million
OSU: $88 million
Stanford: not listed
UCLA: $131 million
USC: not listed
Utah: $112 million
UW: $149 million
WSU: $84 million

Mountain West Teams?
Boise State: $50 million
Fresno State: $47 million
Colorado State: $61 million
SDSU: $67 million
San Jose State: $39 million
Air Force: not listed
Hawaii: $48 million
UNLV: $63 million
Nevada: $45 million
New Mexico: $45 million
Wyoming: $47 million
Utah State: $43 million

So, even if WSU takes a $25 million per year hit on the media side, we would still be at the upper end of conference in terms of funding. Right now, Colorado and OSU are the only two that aren't spending $30 million per year more than WSU in the Pac-12. It's up to Coug fans to decide if we want to be competitive if we end up moving.


 
Not really the same battles we were with against Utah and Oregon. When you look at athletic budgets, here is the breakdown for expenses by team for 2022:

Arizona: $125 million
Arizona State: $124 million
Cal: $115 million
CU: $95 million
Oregon: $141 million
OSU: $88 million
Stanford: not listed
UCLA: $131 million
USC: not listed
Utah: $112 million
UW: $149 million
WSU: $84 million

Mountain West Teams?
Boise State: $50 million
Fresno State: $47 million
Colorado State: $61 million
SDSU: $67 million
San Jose State: $39 million
Air Force: not listed
Hawaii: $48 million
UNLV: $63 million
Nevada: $45 million
New Mexico: $45 million
Wyoming: $47 million
Utah State: $43 million

So, even if WSU takes a $25 million per year hit on the media side, we would still be at the upper end of conference in terms of funding. Right now, Colorado and OSU are the only two that aren't spending $30 million per year more than WSU in the Pac-12. It's up to Coug fans to decide if we want to be competitive if we end up moving.


Fair. How has that worked out for us over the past decade? Your numbers (thank you btw) just confirm what I was saying. We’d be middle of the pac. Not a big fish/bully of the conference. I’d love to see our fan base make up the difference or even 1/2. Not likely, in fact probably more likely to go the other way. I’ve already seen people here say they are done donating in protest of Chun and Schultz.
 
Fair. How has that worked out for us over the past decade? Your numbers (thank you btw) just confirm what I was saying. We’d be middle of the pac. Not a big fish/bully of the conference. I’d love to see our fan base make up the difference or even 1/2. Not likely, in fact probably more likely to go the other way. I’ve already seen people here say they are done donating in protest of Chun and Schultz.

Agree that we won't be the bully of the conference, but we'd be more on more equal footing. Of course, those other teams have been making it by with less money for a long time, so you could make the argument that even if our funding is near the top, we could end up playing more like we are in the middle or bottom of the league just because we aren't used to being "broke".
 
Not really the same battles we were with against Utah and Oregon. When you look at athletic budgets, here is the breakdown for expenses by team for 2022:

Arizona: $125 million
Arizona State: $124 million
Cal: $115 million
CU: $95 million
Oregon: $141 million
OSU: $88 million
Stanford: not listed
UCLA: $131 million
USC: not listed
Utah: $112 million
UW: $149 million
WSU: $84 million

Mountain West Teams?
Boise State: $50 million
Fresno State: $47 million
Colorado State: $61 million
SDSU: $67 million
San Jose State: $39 million
Air Force: not listed
Hawaii: $48 million
UNLV: $63 million
Nevada: $45 million
New Mexico: $45 million
Wyoming: $47 million
Utah State: $43 million

So, even if WSU takes a $25 million per year hit on the media side, we would still be at the upper end of conference in terms of funding. Right now, Colorado and OSU are the only two that aren't spending $30 million per year more than WSU in the Pac-12. It's up to Coug fans to decide if we want to be competitive if we end up moving.


That’s basically what I thought, if WSU doubles down they can be dominate in the m w c and that’s not a bad place to be. The bad move would be to let a Schulz/chun downside the football program to be a middling m w c team, that you would probably never recover from.
 
That’s basically what I thought, if WSU doubles down they can be dominate in the m w c and that’s not a bad place to be. The bad move would be to let a Schulz/chun downside the football program to be a middling m w c team, that you would probably never recover from.
Of course it would be downsized.

1. Colorado State's Jay Norvell, $1.6 million
2. Wyoming's Craig Bohl, $1.6 million
3. UNLV's Marcus Arroyo, $1.55 million
4t. Fresno State's Jeff Tedford, $1.5 million
4t. San Jose State's Brent Brennan, $1.5 million
6. Boise State's Andy Avalos, $1.475 million
7. San Diego State's Brady Hoke, $1.1 million
8. Utah State's Blake Anderson, $1.025 million
9. Nevada's Ken Wilson, $950,000
10. New Mexico's Danny Gonzales, $700,000
11. Hawaii's Timmy Chang, $500,010

Look, we'd be rolling phat with CJD being a TOP PAID COACH!!!
Honestly, probably a better fit financially. We are a nickel and dime school.
 
Of course it would be downsized.

1. Colorado State's Jay Norvell, $1.6 million
2. Wyoming's Craig Bohl, $1.6 million
3. UNLV's Marcus Arroyo, $1.55 million
4t. Fresno State's Jeff Tedford, $1.5 million
4t. San Jose State's Brent Brennan, $1.5 million
6. Boise State's Andy Avalos, $1.475 million
7. San Diego State's Brady Hoke, $1.1 million
8. Utah State's Blake Anderson, $1.025 million
9. Nevada's Ken Wilson, $950,000
10. New Mexico's Danny Gonzales, $700,000
11. Hawaii's Timmy Chang, $500,010

Look, we'd be rolling phat with CJD being a TOP PAID COACH!!!
Honestly, probably a better fit financially. We are a nickel and dime school.
While they're not P5 contracts, $1.5 - $2M to coach football isn't a bad gig at all. Just gonna have to include hefty buy outs to help insulate us from poaching.
 
Of course it would be downsized.

1. Colorado State's Jay Norvell, $1.6 million
2. Wyoming's Craig Bohl, $1.6 million
3. UNLV's Marcus Arroyo, $1.55 million
4t. Fresno State's Jeff Tedford, $1.5 million
4t. San Jose State's Brent Brennan, $1.5 million
6. Boise State's Andy Avalos, $1.475 million
7. San Diego State's Brady Hoke, $1.1 million
8. Utah State's Blake Anderson, $1.025 million
9. Nevada's Ken Wilson, $950,000
10. New Mexico's Danny Gonzales, $700,000
11. Hawaii's Timmy Chang, $500,010

Look, we'd be rolling phat with CJD being a TOP PAID COACH!!!
Honestly, probably a better fit financially. We are a nickel and dime school.
1. UNLV, Marcus Arroyo was fired last year. New coach Barry Odom will make $1.75 million
 
  • Like
Reactions: WindyCityCoug
Of course it would be downsized.

1. Colorado State's Jay Norvell, $1.6 million
2. Wyoming's Craig Bohl, $1.6 million
3. UNLV's Marcus Arroyo, $1.55 million
4t. Fresno State's Jeff Tedford, $1.5 million
4t. San Jose State's Brent Brennan, $1.5 million
6. Boise State's Andy Avalos, $1.475 million
7. San Diego State's Brady Hoke, $1.1 million
8. Utah State's Blake Anderson, $1.025 million
9. Nevada's Ken Wilson, $950,000
10. New Mexico's Danny Gonzales, $700,000
11. Hawaii's Timmy Chang, $500,010

Look, we'd be rolling phat with CJD being a TOP PAID COACH!!!
Honestly, probably a better fit financially. We are a nickel and dime school.
You may well be right, but that’s a real shame if that’s the way it plays out.
 
That’s basically what I thought, if WSU doubles down they can be dominate in the m w c and that’s not a bad place to be. The bad move would be to let a Schulz/chun downside the football program to be a middling m w c team, that you would probably never recover from.
If you, or anyone else here, had to guess whether WSU would "double down" to "dominate" in the MWC or ... uh, not, especially with all the other fiscal adjustments required ... what would you guess? Think they're going to pay Jake Dickert almost $3m for any period of time? Suddenly start funding a private jet when they lost the Pac-12 $? How about the impact on donations and attendance? Yes, like the other hundred times I've seen calls go out to fans to donate to support WSU at a critical time, sure, in concept that might happen, but let's get real. It's not happening.

Not giving you shit in particular, Chuck. I just don't understand why anyone would possibly think WSU would either commit the resources to dominate in the MWC nor be able to, in recruiting or any other senses, even if it attempted to do so. We get 2/3 of the recruits we currently do owing to P5 status. The school is in a less desirable location than most other schools in the Mountain West, too, assuming a kid doesn't want to be in the middle of nowhere in a town with nothing to do, especially when we get 12,000 people to attend instead of 25,000 actual butts in seats. There are going to be all kinds of cuts to coaching, staffing, travel, recruiting, and other germane budgets. That's what's happening here.

Sorry, thought I was done here for a while--just pissed--but I really don't understand what actual evidence anyone has for thinking WSU could, or would, dominate anything.
 
Divesting or downsizing to be a middling m w c, would definitely not be my goal if I was makiNg the decisions. if the financial situation is so dire you have no choice that’s another matter, but I would try to invest in the football program if at all possible.
 
If you, or anyone else here, had to guess whether WSU would "double down" to "dominate" in the MWC or ... uh, not, especially with all the other fiscal adjustments required ... what would you guess? Think they're going to pay Jake Dickert almost $3m for any period of time? Suddenly start funding a private jet when they lost the Pac-12 $? How about the impact on donations and attendance? Yes, like the other hundred times I've seen calls go out to fans to donate to support WSU at a critical time, sure, in concept that might happen, but let's get real. It's not happening.

Not giving you shit in particular, Chuck. I just don't understand why anyone would possibly think WSU would either commit the resources to dominate in the MWC nor be able to, in recruiting or any other senses, even if it attempted to do so. We get 2/3 of the recruits we currently do owing to P5 status. The school is in a less desirable location than most other schools in the Mountain West, too, assuming a kid doesn't want to be in the middle of nowhere in a town with nothing to do, especially when we get 12,000 people to attend instead of 25,000 actual butts in seats. There are going to be all kinds of cuts to coaching, staffing, travel, recruiting, and other germane budgets. That's what's happening here.

Sorry, thought I was done here for a while--just pissed--but I really don't understand what actual evidence anyone has for thinking WSU could, or would, dominate anything.



I agree completely 425.

After presiding over the demise of the Pac 12 conference, Shulz seems to suggest in his ESPN interview that student fees and increased donations might help make up for lost revenue from the Pac 12/NCAA. In the Cougars five-year budget projection, the Pac 12/NCAA line item was expected to provide $40-$49 million per year revenue over the next five years; about half of the total budget every year.

In a best case scenario, if the existing debt is paid off using a possible windfall from a Pac 12 dissolution, it eliminates only about $11 million per year from that budget expense projection. (The dissolution settlement, if any, could be tied up in the courts for years. The attorneys will make sure of that and get their share before any distribution is made.) And a cobbled together new conference might garner $10 million max from a media contract in the current market. That leaves a daunting revenue shortfall of $19-$28 million per year, best case. Probably more like $25-$35 million per year. Good luck on making up for that with increased donations and student fees.

Expenses will need to be reduced substantially. By far the largest expense item in the budget is Compensation, at about $30 million plus per year. The current hiring freeze to address AD department mis-management in FY23 is only the tip of the iceberg. Even best case, staffing levels and salary structures will require major reductions to have any hope of balancing the budget.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT