ADVERTISEMENT

Northern Colorado predictions

WSU 48 NC 20. Most of this week has been spent on OSU prep. A couple series for the starters and get to the locker room without any injuries.
 
UNC will get points in the 2nd half, agreed. We just need to go out an execute, block, hike the ball to the QBs hands, and we will be fine.

I'm surpised the terrible QB staps haven't been a source of concern with more Coug fans. Very, very poor work by our center thus far. Inexcusable mistakes.
 
be nice to see the defense pitch a shut out. I'd like to think the offense can put up 45 or more. I don't have a problem with less points of the reserves play the entire 2nd half
 
be nice to see the defense pitch a shut out. I'd like to think the offense can put up 45 or more. I don't have a problem with less points of the reserves play the entire 2nd half
Explain to me why we are playing a Big Sky team in the first place? Why not just play Idaho?
 
I don't want to get too cocky and predict 84-0. But I just don't see anywhere that we don't have a decisive advantage. I'm seeing a comfortable first half lead - something on the order of 31-3, and going over to the backups early in the 3rd. Might be a slow third quarter - because they usually are, and because the 2nd team won't have their legs under them. But I think the 2nd team gets a couple of scores and we've got #3 under center before it ends. NC picks up some points in garbage time against the bottom of the depth chart.

I'm going with 52-24, but since NC has only scored 18 points total against teams that are likely worse than us...the 24 might be too much.


I don't necessarily object to playing a Big Sky team, but I'm not a big fan of playing really bad Big Sky teams. We still run the risk of injuries that could impact the season, and we really don't gain anything. It should give some live PT for the backups, but it has little value even as practice for the starters.
 
Idaho is going to Cal this weekend to beat the snot out of the Bears.

Yes, you read it here first.
Idaho makes an interesting psychology study. They seem to be more competitive against FBS opponents when they’re not an FBS team. They can’t have better players, coaches, or resources than they did. Is it that they’re playing with more underdog mentality? No expectation to win, so they have no pressure to perform? Or is it the opponents are less prepared?

Hard to figure really, since nobody took them seriously for the last decade as a FBS team anyway. But they definitely look better now.
 
Close enough. We'd gone 2-7 the year before. That year we ended up about 5-4.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT