OT: Sha'carri Richardson

[CougEd]

You asked why, and the answer is the Constitution provides for states to make their own election laws. You might want to run down the "non elected official" thing too. Non-elected officials are who do the work of counting, disqualifying, verifying, certifying, etc. They're generally volunteers. But you're good with the ID requirement, I assume.

Go ahead and do your own research. You can take a look at Delaware's election laws too if you like. Please tell us if you find Jim Eagle.

Oh...I have done my research. If Georgia had Colorado's election laws those who feel disenfranchised would jump for joy. Not sure why you consider it "restrictive" that Colorado sends out 100% mail in ballots to all those who are registered to vote.

Again, if Georgia allowed 100% mail in's, I am sure they would take it.

 

[dgibbons]

Ok guy who repeats Tucker Carlson talking points.

What are Tucker's Carlson's talking points?

 

[dgibbons]

Oh...I have done my research. If Georgia had Colorado's election laws those who feel disenfranchised would jump for joy. Not sure why you consider it "restrictive" that Colorado sends out 100% mail in ballots to all those who are registered to vote.

Again, if Georgia allowed 100% mail in's, I am sure they would take it.

Well, considering the Georgia legislature just changed the law and universal mail-in voting is not part of it, you would be wrong. Please give us a point by point comparison.

Also, did you find Jim Eagle?

 

[CougEd]

Enough to spot the BS.

Oh.. do they spot that Georgia is trying to restrict the vote? Maybe you can tell me

Well, considering the Georgia legislature just changed the law and universal mail-in voting is not part of it, you would be wrong. Please give us a point by point comparison.

Also, did you find Jim Eagle?

Why would I give you a point by point comparison. It is about voting access. There is not a more accesible system than mail in balloting. So by definition when 100% of the people get a mail-in ballot and simply mail it back, that is most accessible.

 

[CougEd]

Back on topic -

here's the statement from USATF :
"First and foremost, we are incredibly sympathetic toward Sha'Carri Richardson's extenuating circumstances and strongly applaud her accountability - and will offer her our continued support both on and off the track.

While USATF fully agrees that the merit of the World Anti-Doping Agency rules related to THC should be reevaluated, it would be detrimental to the integrity of the U.S. Olympic Team Trials for Track & Field if USATF amended its policies following competition, only weeks before the Olympic Games.

All USATF athletes are equally aware of and must adhere to the current anti-doping code, and our credibility as the National Governing Body would be lost if rules were only enforced under certain circumstances.

So while our heartfelt understanding lies with Sha’Carri, we must also maintain fairness for all of the athletes who attempted to realize their dreams by securing a place on the U.S. Olympic Track & Field Team."

Must be a bunch of old racist white men traitors.

By that statement you as someone who is white feel like you are picked on, or only old white men are racist or perceived as racist.

 

[dgibbons]

Oh.. do they spot that Georgia is trying to restrict the vote? Maybe you can tell me

Why would I give you a point by point comparison. It is about voting access. There is not a more accesible system than mail in balloting. So by definition when 100% of the people get a mail-in ballot and simply mail it back, that is most accessible.

Is "voting access" manipulating the vote? People are of course free not to vote. Why do they need to receive something automatically?

There is more to it in Colorado than just getting a ballot in the mail. In typical Ed fashion you are moving the goalposts all over the place to make some kind of nonsensical point, all while trying to mask your ignorance.

 

[Coug90]

So Hillary can lie with impunity for years, adding fuel to the fire that exploded on January 6. Good to know.

You chose poorly.

You make a lot of good points and back most up well with facts gib, even some I don’t agree with. I never liked Hillary but casting a heap of blame on her for Jan 6th is a turd pile bigger than the one in Jurassic Park, and I think you know that.

 

[Coug90]

For most Americans, the failures and inadequacies of Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders are annoying. Many of us feel that those flaws don't justify the support of Donald Trump. Be a Republican all you want......just don't be a Trumpster. That man is not worthy of your support.

Playing "what about" and using Hillary as your justification for Trump and his actions is, to quote Trump.....sad. I constantly see posts by my friends judging the millenials and saying, "When I was a kid.....". Well, when I was a kid, I remember hearing, "two wrongs don't make a right" and for some reason, people think that Hillary's existence is justification for the GOP turning into a self absorbed, greedy, hypocritical group of people that don't care about the truth and really only care about #winning and #triggerthelibtards. Trump has perverted the GOP into a caricature of itself.

I don't like Hillary Clinton. I think Bernie is well meaning but a total fool. That doesn't mean that I should support a narcissistic tyrant wannabe like Trump just to oppose them. Pick a different hill to die on. History is not going to look kindly on Trump or his supporters.

I think a few years ago you could have argued that first part Flat but not anymore. The R party today is basically Jim Walden screaming about why PW is a great D1 football coach. There’s a handful that haven’t completely lost their minds or outwardly given in to greed and corruption, but if you are going all in with MyPillowGuy and MTG you can’t expect any reasonable minded person…party aside…to take you seriously.

 

[Flatlandcoug]

I think a few years ago you could have argued that first part Flat but not anymore. The R party today is basically Jim Walden screaming about why PW is a great D1 football coach. There’s a handful that haven’t completely lost their minds or outwardly given in to greed and corruption, but if you are going all in with MyPillowGuy and MTG you can’t expect any reasonable minded person…party aside…to take you seriously.

Fair enough. I'm actually a lifelong Republican (registered as such for over 30 years) but since I haven't bent the knee and sworn fealty to Trump and because I haven't been willing to shift my politics to the right to match the loudest voices in the room, I'm considered a RINO nowadays. A lot of my friends view that as an insult, but I wear it as a badge of honor.

 

[dgibbons]

You make a lot of good points and back most up well with facts gib, even some I don’t agree with. I never liked Hillary but casting a heap of blame on her for Jan 6th is a turd pile bigger than the one in Jurassic Park, and I think you know that.

She poured fuel on the fire, and opened the door to disputing valid elections to protect her own ego. Trump did more than his fair share. The explosion finally happened on January 6.

 

[dgibbons]

Fair enough. I'm actually a lifelong Republican (registered as such for over 30 years) but since I haven't bent the knee and sworn fealty to Trump and because I haven't been willing to shift my politics to the right to match the loudest voices in the room, I'm considered a RINO nowadays. A lot of my friends view that as an insult, but I wear it as a badge of honor.

So you identify as resistance. Good for you.

 

[Coug90]

She poured fuel on the fire, and opened the door to disputing valid elections to protect her own ego. Trump did more than his fair share. The explosion finally happened on January 6.

If you need an appropriate analogy that includes Hillary…she (include Obama if you must) left a couple of damp pieces of kindling…Trump took a giant shit full of kerosene and rocket fuel and torched it while MTG, Cruz, gym Jordan, Mo Brooks, Boebert, Et al, pumped oxygen and more flammables onto the fire until the traitorous culmination of Jan 6th.

 

[KRUSTYtheCOUG]

How about you don't assume anything. I know it's hard for you, but you can try harder.

Here's a suggestion- quit watching CNN and MSNBC. They're the ones focused on Trump because it drives their ratings, bigly. Really bigly. Try independent and centrist news and journalism.

If you could only get your news from 1 source, what would you choose? That's all I have to ask about that.

 

[CougEd]

She poured fuel on the fire, and opened the door to disputing valid elections to protect her own ego. Trump did more than his fair share. The explosion finally happened on January 6.

Wait...You believe this is about Hillary? Hillary conceded the night she lost. She talked about Russian interference and that information came from the FBI. She didn't fight it in courts. He was our duly elected President. How many Senators chose not to confirm that he was not our Prez?

And if you want to go down the Russian rabbit hole, why did Trump lie about meetings his people had. Let me tell you where I am politically...if Chelsea met with Russian representatives before the election, lied for 6 months until they were caught...if that was Chelsea, I would have asked Hillary be impeached immediately. No investigation. If Chelsea met withy Russian officials and lied about it then admits it, there wouldn't have needed to be an investigation.

 

[CougEd]

Is "voting access" manipulating the vote? People are of course free not to vote. Why do they need to receive something automatically?

There is more to it in Colorado than just getting a ballot in the mail. In typical Ed fashion you are moving the goalposts all over the place to make some kind of nonsensical point, all while trying to mask your ignorance.

Mail in ballots that are given to every registered voter is ease of voting. Giving you a point by point comparison is stupid.

It would be like me telling you that Montana has greater restrictions on emissions than California...Then we go Go line by line. Montana say has an emissions test every 30 days. They have a ten dollar fine every month, they require you to detail every gallon of gas you pump into your vehicle, and finally, they don't require cars to have catalytic converters.

By definition of everyone having access to mail in ballots makes it less restrictive. Nothing else matters.

Maybe a better example and closer to home would me stating Jim Walden was a more successful coach than Mike Leach at WSU. You state the obvious. Look at the bowl games, look at the over all record. I say...wow, lets go line by line.

Walden produced a Super Bowl winning and MVP QB. Walden recruited a first round pick in Rosie. He produced a 1000 year back for the nfl, rookie of the year, a player who held the NCAA single game rushing total. Walden had one Dlineman who was defensive player of the year in the NFL and a first round draft pick, had a second round draft pick, and a 3rd round draft pick at DL. He had several DB's who were all pro in the nfl. And he didn't have the facilities or the schedule Leach had.

I think most people including myself would look at the record and not need to go into a deep dive into all the other stuff.

Even with all that said, say I agree with 90% of what Kemp has done, it is the 10% that is a flat out killer. Allowing the ruling party to remove board of election officials and then allowing one person who is not elected to decide the fate of votes. That is a nail in the coffin to what we call our democracy where votes no longer matter. And at some point they won't be able to out run the numbers, and when dems are in power in those states, I am sure they won't forget and will piggyback those policies and will for a very long time turn those red states to blue and won't relinquish power at the state level.

 

[FnuLnu]

Wait...You believe this is about Hillary? Hillary conceded the night she lost. She talked about Russian interference and that information came from the FBI. She didn't fight it in courts. He was our duly elected President. How many Senators chose not to confirm that he was not our Prez?

And if you want to go down the Russian rabbit hole, why did Trump lie about meetings his people had. Let me tell you where I am politically...if Chelsea met with Russian representatives before the election, lied for 6 months until they were caught...if that was Chelsea, I would have asked Hillary be impeached immediately. No investigation. If Chelsea met withy Russian officials and lied about it then admits it, there wouldn't have needed to be an investigation.

If you were afraid to stand up to Jim Walden to get Paul Wulff fired, then how would you have been brave enough to stand up to Hillary Clinton if her daughter took a meeting with somebody?

 

[dgibbons]

If you could only get your news from 1 source, what would you choose? That's all I have to ask about that.

Probably The Hill.

 

[dgibbons]

Wait...You believe this is about Hillary? Hillary conceded the night she lost. She talked about Russian interference and that information came from the FBI. She didn't fight it in courts. He was our duly elected President. How many Senators chose not to confirm that he was not our Prez?

And if you want to go down the Russian rabbit hole, why did Trump lie about meetings his people had. Let me tell you where I am politically...if Chelsea met with Russian representatives before the election, lied for 6 months until they were caught...if that was Chelsea, I would have asked Hillary be impeached immediately. No investigation. If Chelsea met withy Russian officials and lied about it then admits it, there wouldn't have needed to be an investigation.

Right. I assume you're aware the DNC and Hillary's campaign funneled money to Steele for his dossier, and that Hillary spent four years complaining about how the election was stolen from her, Trump was illegitimate, Russiagate, etc. You're the one going down the Russia rabbit hole. Maybe you should start the independent CougEd investigation. That would be great. You would have asked for Hillary to be impeached? You sure are powerful. Are you going to ask for Biden to be impeached over Hunter's dealings with Ukraine, Mexico, China, etc.? What about Biden's lies?

You can read about the confirmation of the 2016 election below if you choose. And, yes I know the objecting members of the House didn't get a senator to join, but there was plenty of objections.

Despite objections, Congress certifies Donald Trump's election

Congress made the election of Donald Trump official Friday, certifying the votes of the Electoral College in a formal joint session of Congress.

www.nbcnews.com

 

[dgibbons]

Mail in ballots that are given to every registered voter is ease of voting. Giving you a point by point comparison is stupid.

It would be like me telling you that Montana has greater restrictions on emissions than California...Then we go Go line by line. Montana say has an emissions test every 30 days. They have a ten dollar fine every month, they require you to detail every gallon of gas you pump into your vehicle, and finally, they don't require cars to have catalytic converters.

By definition of everyone having access to mail in ballots makes it less restrictive. Nothing else matters.

Maybe a better example and closer to home would me stating Jim Walden was a more successful coach than Mike Leach at WSU. You state the obvious. Look at the bowl games, look at the over all record. I say...wow, lets go line by line.

Walden produced a Super Bowl winning and MVP QB. Walden recruited a first round pick in Rosie. He produced a 1000 year back for the nfl, rookie of the year, a player who held the NCAA single game rushing total. Walden had one Dlineman who was defensive player of the year in the NFL and a first round draft pick, had a second round draft pick, and a 3rd round draft pick at DL. He had several DB's who were all pro in the nfl. And he didn't have the facilities or the schedule Leach had.

I think most people including myself would look at the record and not need to go into a deep dive into all the other stuff.

Even with all that said, say I agree with 90% of what Kemp has done, it is the 10% that is a flat out killer. Allowing the ruling party to remove board of election officials and then allowing one person who is not elected to decide the fate of votes. That is a nail in the coffin to what we call our democracy where votes no longer matter. And at some point they won't be able to out run the numbers, and when dems are in power in those states, I am sure they won't forget and will piggyback those policies and will for a very long time turn those red states to blue and won't relinquish power at the state level.

Because you're incapable of doing so. Instead you analogize to emissions and Jim Walden. Way to go.

Kemp signed a bill. The Georgia legislature passed it. You are clearly ignorant of law, elections, and legislative process. Non-elected persons, like volunteers, scrutinize signatures on ballots, compare the voter's name to the voting rolls, etc. You have no idea what you're talking about. You're just parroting talking points.

Here's a newsflash for you Ed- your vote in Washington (at least for President and US Senate) doesn't matter. The reason is that Washington voters overwhelmingly vote democrat.

 

[CougEd]

Because you're incapable of doing so. Instead you analogize to emissions and Jim Walden. Way to go.

Kemp signed a bill. The Georgia legislature passed it. You are clearly ignorant of law, elections, and legislative process. Non-elected persons, like volunteers, scrutinize signatures on ballots, compare the voter's name to the voting rolls, etc. You have no idea what you're talking about. You're just parroting talking points.

Here's a newsflash for you Ed- your vote in Washington (at least for President and US Senate) doesn't matter. The reason is that Washington voters overwhelmingly vote democrat.

Oh I know how laws work. I read the legislation. I know the power the Sec of State had in 2020 and now that elected official was "stripped' of that power. Why do you think that is?

And you have zero idea how I have voted in the past, but guess what, my vote was never restricted, and my guess neither has yours.

Let me give you one closer to home. Inslee's election in the future comes peerlessly close, in part of voter turn out in Spokane. Washington state legislature says all ballots east of the mountains have to be drive up because they suspect voter fraud. No proof at all but just want to nip it in the bud just in case.

Also, they want to eliminate voting sites in Spokane, reduce voting to one day, and one site in Spokane and the next closest is one in Ritzville. Yeah, but that is not as restrictive as say Colorado line by line....Please

And just accept that as "the law""

 

[dgibbons]

Oh I know how laws work. I read the legislation. I know the power the Sec of State had in 2020 and now that elected official was "stripped' of that power. Why do you think that is?

And you have zero idea how I have voted in the past, but guess what, my vote was never restricted, and my guess neither has yours.

Let me give you one closer to home. Inslee's election in the future comes peerlessly close, in part of voter turn out in Spokane. Washington state legislature says all ballots east of the mountains have to be drive up because they suspect voter fraud. No proof at all but just want to nip it in the bud just in case.

Also, they want to eliminate voting sites in Spokane, reduce voting to one day, and one site in Spokane and the next closest is one in Ritzville. Yeah, but that is not as restrictive as say Colorado line by line....Please

And just accept that as "the law""

So you read the part of the legislation that provides for removal of the county election boards only where a minimum of three violations of election rules or demonstration of gross negligence or malfeasance over the span of two consecutive elections?

I never said I knew how you voted. What I will repeat is that your vote for President and US Senate is meaningless. But, look! Another nonsensical analogy from Ed, clearly demonstrating he doesn't know what he's talking about.

 

[CougEd]

Right. I assume you're aware the DNC and Hillary's campaign funneled money to Steele for his dossier, and that Hillary spent four years complaining about how the election was stolen from her, Trump was illegitimate, Russiagate, etc. You're the one going down the Russia rabbit hole. Maybe you should start the independent CougEd investigation. That would be great. You would have asked for Hillary to be impeached? You sure are powerful. Are you going to ask for Biden to be impeached over Hunter's dealings with Ukraine, Mexico, China, etc.? What about Biden's lies?

You can read about the confirmation of the 2016 election below if you choose. And, yes I know the objecting members of the House didn't get a senator to join, but there was plenty of objections.

Despite objections, Congress certifies Donald Trump's election

Congress made the election of Donald Trump official Friday, certifying the votes of the Electoral College in a formal joint session of Congress.

www.nbcnews.com

You get he was confirmed right? And you get that he was our elected leader, correct?

If it comes to light Hunter Biden asked for information regarding the election and told them August was the perfect time to release it, yeah I would like to see Biden impeached if Biden junior had any dealings trying to allow outside influence in our election.

 

[CougEd]

So you read the part of the legislation that provides for removal of the county election boards only where a minimum of three violations of election rules or demonstration of gross negligence or malfeasance over the span of two consecutive elections?

I never said I knew how you voted. What I will repeat is that your vote for President and US Senate is meaningless. But, look! Another nonsensical analogy from Ed, clearly demonstrating he doesn't know what he's talking about.

Yes, and I have read the part where they removed the Sec of state as the chair of the board, and person who is the head of it...yeah I read that. Also read the part where Kemp gets to choose the head, lead, influencer of the board. Sorry I guess I should have been more detailed for you vs cutting to the nuts and bolts of what is happening.

Actually my vote ISNT meaningless. I may not get my candidate I wish on a state level, or maybe I do, but meaningless. Voting is a right people have died for, while others had bone spurs, but I digress.

 

[dgibbons]

You get he was confirmed right? And you get that he was our elected leader, correct?

If it comes to light Hunter Biden asked for information regarding the election and told them August was the perfect time to release it, yeah I would like to see Biden impeached if Biden junior had any dealings trying to allow outside influence in our election.

Yes, I do. Biden was confirmed as well. Thanks for pointing out absolutely nothing. Good job.

 

[dgibbons]

Yes, and I have read the part where they removed the Sec of state as the chair of the board, and person who is the head of it...yeah I read that. Also read the part where Kemp gets to choose the head, lead, influencer of the board. Sorry I guess I should have been more detailed for you vs cutting to the nuts and bolts of what is happening.

Actually my vote ISNT meaningless. I may not get my candidate I wish on a state level, or maybe I do, but meaningless. Voting is a right people have died for, while others had bone spurs, but I digress.

Wrong again Ed. The chair of the State Elections Board is non-voting. The SOS's Election Division is still in charge of certifying election results, and still works with county election boards. You're parroting CNN/MSNBC talking points and don't even know it. Have you read any of Raffensperger's comments about the new law? He happens to agree with the State Elections Board being able to step in for county boards that have had a history of problems.

If the people of Georgia, through their duly elected representatives, feel this change to the law was necessary, who exactly is CougEd to tell them otherwise? Are you trying to invalidate the state elections where Georgians elected their leaders?

Your vote is meaningless because the same outcome would have occurred with or without your vote, or whether or not you actually voted. That's the electoral college at work for presidential elections. Sorry to break that news to you. Biden got five student deferments, then a medical exemption. Yippee.

 

[acgcoug]

Yes, and I have read the part where they removed the Sec of state as the chair of the board, and person who is the head of it...yeah I read that. Also read the part where Kemp gets to choose the head, lead, influencer of the board. Sorry I guess I should have been more detailed for you vs cutting to the nuts and bolts of what is happening.

Actually my vote ISNT meaningless. I may not get my candidate I wish on a state level, or maybe I do, but meaningless. Voting is a right people have died for, while others had bone spurs, but I digress.

or while others (Biden) used 5 military deferments and "teenage asthma", all while being a high school sports standout, and he played football in college. Bill Clinton dodged multiple times as well, and his circumventing the military was the most creative out of them all.

Frankly I don't blame any of them either if someone isn't interested in being in the military. IMO, a lame, and weak talking point Ed, especially if you didn't serve yourself.

 

[Coug90]

or while others (Biden) used 5 military deferments and "teenage asthma", all while being a high school sports standout, and he played football in college. Bill Clinton dodged multiple times as well, and his circumventing the military was the most creative out of them all.

Frankly I don't blame any of them either if someone isn't interested in being in the military. IMO, a lame, and weak talking point Ed, especially if you didn't serve yourself.

The ironic thing is that if you didn’t know anything about either guy you’d be inclined to believe the legitimacy of Trumps deferments because of the bizarre way the guy has to stand up, and because Biden is physically active - can run, bike, walk up and down ramps and drink glasses of water with no problem. But if you dig deeper and learn one guy has had sons who have served while the other has mocked the military and publicly insulted war heroes, kinda blows that theory up.

 

[CougEd]

If you were afraid to stand up to Jim Walden to get Paul Wulff fired, then how would you have been brave enough to stand up to Hillary Clinton if her daughter took a meeting with somebody?

Well Yaki…. And I mean this seriously … if I had known after the success Mike Leach had, going to numerous bowl games, and that Wulff is so far in the rear view mirror- if I had known you would still be Obsessing about a coach who was fired a decade ago, I certainly for your sake would “mustered ” up the strength to tell Walden to quit supporting a “family” member.

Not sure how many times I have to tell you this … but I will once again. I am not sure why Leach wasn’t hired in 09. Why moos didn’t hire him for the 10 or 11 season . I would have fired wulff in 10 even tho I saw very slow progress to hire Leach. Ask Biggs we texted about it often . I would have fired my brother in 10 to hire a proven coach like Leach.

 

[KRUSTYtheCOUG]

She poured fuel on the fire, and opened the door to disputing valid elections to protect her own ego. Trump did more than his fair share. The explosion finally happened on January 6.

Just to clarify...do you believe Clinton is equally as culpable as trump for Jan 6th, or more...or less? And, are you equating her bitching about the 2016 election to trumps bitching about 2020?

 

[dgibbons]

Just to clarify...do you believe Clinton is equally as culpable as trump for Jan 6th, or more...or less? And, are you equating her bitching about the 2016 election to trumps bitching about 2020?

“Trump did more than his fair share.”

Please tell me you read better than Ed.

 

[KRUSTYtheCOUG]

“Trump did more than his fair share.”

Please tell me you read better than Ed.

"Fair share" is subjective. What do you define as fair share? Equal to Clinton, less than or more than?

 

[dgibbons]

"Fair share" is subjective. What do you define as fair share? Equal to Clinton, less than or more than?

I answered your question. You’re not proving you can read better than Ed.

 

[KRUSTYtheCOUG]

I answered your question. You’re not proving you can read better than Ed.

You answered vaguely. I'm asking for a clarification of what you specifically mean as would happen in a dialogue to give you the fairest opportunity to not be misinterpreted. I'm leaning towards believing that you believe Hillary is either equally culpable for Jan 6 or more so than trump. Is this an accurate summary of your view point?

 

[dgibbons]

You answered vaguely. I'm asking for a clarification of what you specifically mean as would happen in a dialogue to give you the fairest opportunity to not be misinterpreted. I'm leaning towards believing that you believe Hillary is either equally culpable for Jan 6 or more so than trump. Is this an accurate summary of your view point?

No.

 

[KRUSTYtheCOUG]

No.
[/QUO
Good to know, although curious that your first two comments regarding Jan 6 that mentioned anyone pointed to specific blame towards hillary and not the one you allegedly hold more responsible. That's all I have to say about that.

 

[dgibbons]

No.
[/QUO
Good to know, although curious that your first two comments regarding Jan 6 that mentioned anyone pointed to specific blame towards hillary and not the one you allegedly hold more responsible. That's all I have to say about that.

What's curious is that you and Ed both fail to correctly use the quote function on this website. Also it's genuinely curious that you often write "That's all I have to say about that." when you clearly have more to say. Third, the people I hold "more responsible" are those that actually breached the Capitol, although the lack of charges for insurrection is curious.

 

[KRUSTYtheCOUG]

No.
[/QUO
Good to know, although curious that your first two comments regarding Jan 6 that mentioned anyone pointed to specific blame towards hillary and not the one you allegedly hold more responsible. That's all I have to say about that.

What's curious is that you and Ed both fail to correctly use the quote function on this website. Also it's genuinely curious that you often write "That's all I have to say about that." when you clearly have more to say. Third, the people I hold "more responsible" are those that actually breached the Capitol, although the lack of charges for insurrection is curious.

Why use the "quote" function when just hitting "reply" works just fine? Why is Ed so clearly in your head so often?

As to my tag-line, you must be noticeably on the spectrum if, at this point, it concerns you enough to mention it. Not that there's anything wrong with that.

Since you allegedly hold the actual capitol-breachers most responsible, why bring up Hillary at all? Seems that you were going down the road of holding public officials responsible, otherwise why bring them up? I think we can all agree that those drinking from the Cult 45 brew are most clearly responsible but you say Hillary poured fuel on the fire? Curious indeed. Taihtsat

 

[BleedCrimsonandGray]

back, back on topic:

Never one to miss a chance to race-bait, AOC has called upon the USADA and IOC to give Richardson a pass due to marijuana laws being based in long-standing racist policies.

Point-in-fact: marijauna use is equally distributed among whites and blacks and isn't just a "black thing", but that never stopped a race-baiter from doing their thing.

It makes me ponder: did Al Sharpton officially hand AOC the torch, or was it more just a wink and a nod?

 

[dgibbons]

Why use the "quote" function when just hitting "reply" works just fine? Why is Ed so clearly in your head so often?

As to my tag-line, you must be noticeably on the spectrum if, at this point, it concerns you enough to mention it. Not that there's anything wrong with that.

Since you allegedly hold the actual capitol-breachers most responsible, why bring up Hillary at all? Seems that you were going down the road of holding public officials responsible, otherwise why bring them up? I think we can all agree that those drinking from the Cult 45 brew are most clearly responsible but you say Hillary poured fuel on the fire? Curious indeed. Taihtsat

Why did Ed bring up Trump? That's all I have to say about that.

 

[dgibbons]

back, back on topic:

Never one to miss a chance to race-bait, AOC has called upon the USADA and IOC to give Richardson a pass due to marijuana laws being based in long-standing racist policies.

Point-in-fact: marijauna use is equally distributed among whites and blacks and isn't just a "black thing", but that never stopped a race-baiter from doing their thing.

It makes me ponder: did Al Sharpton officially hand AOC the torch, or was it more just a wink and a nod?

Richardson seems to be taking the disqualification better than a lot of others. Most be a dearth of grandstanding opportunities.