Another Related point.
If a 5 star player, the #1 recruit in the entire nation, went to UW, then decided he wanted to transfer play at WSU:
Absolutely, if you care about WSU, your ok with that, you want that, and WSU, would, coukd, should want, need that, if that were to Happen.
WSU still has recruiting challenges. WSU is NOT a ALABAMA type that can go tell a #1 in nation that not taking them them because they went to a rival college.
If WSU says yes to such a recruit that might probably mean the difference of getting to a Rosebowl, Fiesta Bowl, Cotton Bowl, playoff, national championship, and serving as a catalystic bridge to maybe having WSU go 4 to 8 straight years of going to Rosebowls, getting 4,5 stars, building a semi dynastic football program.
If WSU says no to such a recruit, WSU could end up only winning 4 games a year for 4 to 8 years, etc, and not getting 3,4,5 star recruits in future.
WSU really cant afford to say no to such a recruit, and has to say yes to the recruit, fir the same reason Price took Prop 48's.
WSU going to Rosebowls, building a awesome football program, is MORE IMPORTANT then the rivalry, and because of the Rivalry not taking a 5 star recruit from UW.
Not saying the Rivalry isnt important. Its important. Its just not as important as WSU going to the Rosebowl, getting awesome recruits.
When you are either are or perceived as POOR OLE LITTLE OLE POOR WSU, that usually cant get 5 star recruits, you do whatever, like Prop 48, taking a 5 star from UW, etc.
WSU has to be creative, think outside the box, etc, to recruit good enough, and 1 of the ways WSU does that is accepting a 5 star transfer from UW, if that happens
If a 5 star player, the #1 recruit in the entire nation, went to UW, then decided he wanted to transfer play at WSU:
Absolutely, if you care about WSU, your ok with that, you want that, and WSU, would, coukd, should want, need that, if that were to Happen.
WSU still has recruiting challenges. WSU is NOT a ALABAMA type that can go tell a #1 in nation that not taking them them because they went to a rival college.
If WSU says yes to such a recruit that might probably mean the difference of getting to a Rosebowl, Fiesta Bowl, Cotton Bowl, playoff, national championship, and serving as a catalystic bridge to maybe having WSU go 4 to 8 straight years of going to Rosebowls, getting 4,5 stars, building a semi dynastic football program.
If WSU says no to such a recruit, WSU could end up only winning 4 games a year for 4 to 8 years, etc, and not getting 3,4,5 star recruits in future.
WSU really cant afford to say no to such a recruit, and has to say yes to the recruit, fir the same reason Price took Prop 48's.
WSU going to Rosebowls, building a awesome football program, is MORE IMPORTANT then the rivalry, and because of the Rivalry not taking a 5 star recruit from UW.
Not saying the Rivalry isnt important. Its important. Its just not as important as WSU going to the Rosebowl, getting awesome recruits.
When you are either are or perceived as POOR OLE LITTLE OLE POOR WSU, that usually cant get 5 star recruits, you do whatever, like Prop 48, taking a 5 star from UW, etc.
WSU has to be creative, think outside the box, etc, to recruit good enough, and 1 of the ways WSU does that is accepting a 5 star transfer from UW, if that happens