I don't like this. Lazy. It was obviously a hit piece. But the interview didn't go well. So what do they do? They publish it anyways? Lazy, rushed or more likely BOTH.
Seems like it actually gives the general public more questions. "Why did such a nice boy not play? I wonder what was really going on in that WSU/Mike Leach football place to not let this good boy play ball, like he wants to."
They wanted a hit piece? Interview other players to bolster their angle. Can't get that done, interviews don't go well there either? Guess what!? Make it a, " 2019 WSU football class goes out hurting with bowl loss but with head held high" or whatever. This is a classic example of, a project that was half-baked, didn't go well and they went with it anyways. Didn't want to invest more time into interviews or wasn't thoughtful enough to bake this thing through. Lazy, rushed, or both. Spokesman Review, at it's best.
EDIT: M-I, what questions did this truly answer for you? Did it confirm stuff or truly shed like on area's that were completely dark to you?