Wait.Anyone hearing anything interesting coming out of spring camp? Third practice happening today.
Anyone hear something new this week about spring football? It's a shame that this thread got buried so quickly and is so thin in content. We actually have football happening in Pullman for the past week or so, yet most people want to talk about something else apparently. I appreciate any news past, present, or future regarding spring football.
Glad Cougar
Usually the offense is always lagging behind the defense in the spring for as long as I can remember. Throw a new system and new bodies, it just puts them further behind.
I like this guys philosophy and have a feeling we will see a lot more of Jenkins as I think we will stretch the field vertically which will open up opportunities for his skill set.
There is ZERO comparison. Possibly one of the worst ideas/posts I've ever read.I don't see the resemblance to Michael Black's style, as I don't remember Black moving laterally, backwards, or taking the losses at all that Jenkins seems to do as he searches for a way to break something loose. Granted my memory of Black's play may be all whacked out (or I may be envisioning a different rb altogether) but when I hear his name I'm picturing a back that was pretty good at picking up yardage when there's close quarters and contact involved.
I see Jenkins as a BETTER version of MICHAEL BLACK, especially if use Jenkins in similar way as Michael Black, by stretching the defense all over the field and down field, then running Jenkins.
Glad to see that your recollection is the same as mine.Black was 3 inches taller, 20 pounds heavier, and generally ran between the tackles in a bruising style that didn't rely on speed or shiftiness. Certainly, Jenkins is faster but not as powerful. At least that's my recollection from 25 years ago.
Glad Cougar
That's my memory. Black could run over people, and was effective between the tackles. Part of that was the stable of receivers we had and the QB who could find them, but his running style was much stronger and more straight-ahead.Glad to see that your recollection is the same as mine.
That's my memory. Black could run over people, and was effective between the tackles. Part of that was the stable of receivers we had and the QB who could find them, but his running style was much stronger and more straight-ahead.
Jenkins probably is a little shiftier, and he may be faster (I don't really remember Black being fast, just fast enough after hitting the hole hard), but he doesn't have the physique or the style to run over people, he wants to dodge them and get to the edge faster. If he goes up the middle, he needs someone to make a hole. Black did it himself.
Jenkins will have to be used like they used James Williams. Need a powerful RB to mix him in with. Get some changes of pace and catches in the flat. Gotta prove he can not fumble in live action.
It’s been a long time since we had a real between the tackles RB. I’m thinking Minnich and Green in the early 2000s were the last time we really had (and used) some strong, up the middle guys. Wicks was a an inside runner, but we didn’t use him much…he’s the last one I can remember.Jenkins will have to be used like they used James Williams. Need a powerful RB to mix him in with. Get some changes of pace and catches in the flat. Gotta prove he can not fumble in live action.
We have had run between the tackles backs just not a run between the tackles scheme. Wicks was punishing and Williams was no slouch either. Both of those guys woulda done just fine in a chuck knox offense IMO. Im not sure why Watson isn’t considered either he was pretty tough to bring down last year as I remember.It’s been a long time since we had a real between the tackles RB. I’m thinking Minnich and Green in the early 2000s were the last time we really had (and used) some strong, up the middle guys. Wicks was a an inside runner, but we didn’t use him much…he’s the last one I can remember.
You are right, Williams did not have any 170 yard rushing games as a freshman. But neither did Jenkins. He did run for 130 yards vs. USC last year but his next highest rushing game was 43 yards. Williams, by the way, ran for 126 yards vs. Idaho his freshman year and had twice as many total yards as Jenkins as a freshman.Your comparison of Jenkins to the Freshman James William, was very good, except that James William didn't have 170 yard rushing yard games, and didn't rush for 6 to 9 YPC as a Freshman.
Also Jenkins didn't fall to the ground if you blew on him, like the Freshman James William did, when blew on him.
You are right, Williams did not have any 170 yard rushing games as a freshman. But neither did Jenkins. He did run for 130 yards vs. USC last year but his next highest rushing game was 43 yards. Williams, by the way, ran for 126 yards vs. Idaho his freshman year and had twice as many total yards as Jenkins as a freshman.
Jenkins is a good offensive weapon who I expect will once again be a change up running back to Nakia Watson this fall.
Glad Cougar
Jenkins is the best player the offense has. He should be a featured back, not a change of pace.
What’s Arbuckles split with true rushes? If it’s less than 35% it’s gonna be hard to feature both back. I could see Nakia getting 10 carries 5 passes and Jenkins getting 5&5 on a good day.
LolNakia should get 0 carries. He is slow.
It would also be good to know if it’s good offensive play or bad defense.It would be good to know if the long passes by Mateer were actually long throws or shorter throws with high YAC. Either way, it's encouraging to have Mateer do well and have two capable QBs ready to go.
Glad Cougar
Having watched a ton of Coug scrimmages and practices over the last 20 yrs, I recommend you not draw too many conclusions from the stat lines. Unless you know the situations under which the stats were generated (1s vs 1s, 1s vs 2s, 2s vs 3s, etc...) and who played on which squad, you can't draw any fair comparisons between players. Sounds like the offense was clicking well today, which is very cool (and honestly kinda rare for the first scrimmage of the year).QB controversy possibility. Mateer was WAY THE HELL better then Cam.
Yeah Mateer was 13-20, which is 2 worse then Cam's 15-20, but Mateer's 280 blows Cam's 190 totally out of the water.
Mateer is doing a better job, so far of passing DOWN FIELD, STRETCHING the defense, MORE YARDS PER PASS, etc, then Cam.
Cam might be more consistent, might have better leadership, better intangibles, might lead the offense better, might score more, etc, but in the PURE PRODUCTION category, Cam SO FAR is being BLOWN AWAY.
Because of that, IF Dickert, Arbuckle choose Cam and his lesser production over Mateer, it might start a QB controversy.
Despite that, it does seem Cam is doing better then he has done, is improving, and it looks like that no matter who starts that WSU will have not only a solid QB starter, but a rock solid QB back up, for if the QB starter gets injured. It's like having 2 QB starters.
I think that Watson and Jenkins should BOTH be CO STARTERS, CO FEATURED BACKS.
Like Len Dale White and Reggie Bush that were CO STARTERS, CO FEATURED BACKS, that both went to the NFL.
I think that Watson and Jenkins will be Thunder and lightning change of paces to each other and will help each other to do even better.
With Jenkins 55 yard rush, which so far better then Watson, it's hard to relegate a 55 yard rush to 2nd, 3rd place as a change of pace.
It would also be good to know if it’s good offensive play or bad defense.