..by 9 points. i would take the cougs and the points. There is a slight chance of an upset in this one.
Stanford favored..
- Thread starter ElComanche
- Start date
You missed a zero in the spread, Cougs Cover!!!
How in the effin world does a team that plays this crappy, pathetic, on pace to lose by almost a 100, by almost about 99 points, etc, for most of the season, almost all season long, etc, beat Arizona, ASU, on the road no less?
I guess the little tiny bit of Dr Jeckle in the team, miraculously showed up to beat those teams, and the UGLY Dr Hyde in the team showed up in the teams losses, and the even more UGLIER, NASTY version of Dr Hyde, in this team, showed up to this game.
This is even worse then Paul Graham.
One can, could hope that Kent gets a semi bad head cold, flu, sick, etc, for the rest of the season, then recovers after the rest of the basketball season is over, and that until then, Kent is either Fired, or one of the assistants, takes over as the HC, until then, lol.
I guess the little tiny bit of Dr Jeckle in the team, miraculously showed up to beat those teams, and the UGLY Dr Hyde in the team showed up in the teams losses, and the even more UGLIER, NASTY version of Dr Hyde, in this team, showed up to this game.
This is even worse then Paul Graham.
One can, could hope that Kent gets a semi bad head cold, flu, sick, etc, for the rest of the season, then recovers after the rest of the basketball season is over, and that until then, Kent is either Fired, or one of the assistants, takes over as the HC, until then, lol.
Please it's bad enough w/o politics! My question is how long will ElC hide out this time? Maybe we could make a $100 bet on it.
No hiding To tell you the truth i slept through the game. i woke up and saw the happy news for some posters. A solid ass kicking is an ass kicking by any name. Still trying to dig out of 3 feet os snow. That s no snow job Kent said something about trouble brewing internally and this is what happens when players do not play for each other as a team. You guys are now willing to bet what a bunch of cowardly crap. When asked to step out everyone stepped back : )
You are flat out delusional if you think any Coug is "happy" with a loss of that nature. Pised off is the proper emotional response at the Graham-like results of your false idol.
And you have the gall to call people cowardly after you reveled for three years in Luke Falk's injuries and performance on the basis of a stupid internet bet that, by the way, you still wouldn't have won. Go back and tell me about your wonderful gambling career -because this 9 point Stanford is favored 'could be an upset' is a 48 point disaster. You getting paid to be Ernie's PR guy?
Unbelievable.
I saw the comment about the trouble brewing within the team and It surprised me because we had been hearing lately the team was coming together. Part of the recent surge in how we had been playing was attributed to the team gelling. If the team is having internal problems that opens things up for potential transfer talk.
Its simple. Altho I dont know for sure, cant prove it, I can make a educated, guess, bet, that the "Internal Problem", is just Kent has, had LOST his LOCKER ROOM, PLAYERS, and that his PLAYERS, have QUIT, given up on him, Kent, and that that, is the, Kent's "INTERNAL PROBLEM"
Where did Ernie talk to internal issues? It looked like it. We weren't in sync at any point and made Stanford look like a Tournament team.
Post game interview with Chazz, a little cryptic but Chazz was ready to give him the "everybody has one of these games" out on the game at start of the interview.
Best thing might have been winless Cal beating first place UW last night.
Sounds like some factions on the team that weren't present on the desert trip. How does that happen over a couple of weeks?
it is crazy stuff and needs to be resolved . That is the first that i have heard about it but we wil see how it all shakes out.
I saw Chaz tweet those comments, I also noticed the Cougs have offered a few more bigs recently.
I also saw a tweet from Pierre Cockrell showing him with Haskins on a recruiting visit. Scholarship math shows us having one scholarship, so someone is transferring.
I also saw a tweet from Pierre Cockrell showing him with Haskins on a recruiting visit. Scholarship math shows us having one scholarship, so someone is transferring.
There are some we would be ok leaving and some we wouldn’t. Crockrell would be a good pickup and I think fit at PG. There are 2 additional bigs we offered. One was a 2.5 which is higher than most.
They are obviously targeting Prolific Prep with now 3 offers (and not including 2020 Zach Harvey).
Last edited:
Wow, if WSU assistants, land Pierre Cockrell, his 6 foot 8 teammate, and only lose a bench player, combined with last years recruits, then the team would probably go to either CBI, NIT, NCAA tourney, either next year, or year after next year.
If the Assistants were to be promoted to HC.
Kent, screwed up on his initial assistant coach hires, screwed up on recruiting, screwed up on X's and O's etc:
BUT the one and only things he has done right:
1. Hiring Haskins, Benny Seltzer.
2. Recruiting well last year, this year, or at least a lot better then the bad recruiting before. Actually his assistants Haskins, Seltzer, deserve the credit, but since Kent hired them, then Kent gets technical credit.
But Kent's coaching, X's and O's, and how he has lost the kids, locker room, have kids, team give up on him, quit, because he is bad coach, is terrible.
If Tony Bennet, Coach K were the HC, of this years, next years team, WSU would have won 15 to 20 games, CBI, NIT, etc, with the weakest schedule in history.
So altho WSU will probably have good enough talent, etc, to win 15 to 21 games, CBI, NIT, NCAA, each year, over the next 1, 2, 3 years,
You can count on Kent to waste that and only get 6 to 12 wins per year, over the next 1,2,3 years, as that is how bad of a coach Kent is, including his terribly bad X's and O's, etc.
If the Assistants were to be promoted to HC.
Kent, screwed up on his initial assistant coach hires, screwed up on recruiting, screwed up on X's and O's etc:
BUT the one and only things he has done right:
1. Hiring Haskins, Benny Seltzer.
2. Recruiting well last year, this year, or at least a lot better then the bad recruiting before. Actually his assistants Haskins, Seltzer, deserve the credit, but since Kent hired them, then Kent gets technical credit.
But Kent's coaching, X's and O's, and how he has lost the kids, locker room, have kids, team give up on him, quit, because he is bad coach, is terrible.
If Tony Bennet, Coach K were the HC, of this years, next years team, WSU would have won 15 to 20 games, CBI, NIT, etc, with the weakest schedule in history.
So altho WSU will probably have good enough talent, etc, to win 15 to 21 games, CBI, NIT, NCAA, each year, over the next 1, 2, 3 years,
You can count on Kent to waste that and only get 6 to 12 wins per year, over the next 1,2,3 years, as that is how bad of a coach Kent is, including his terribly bad X's and O's, etc.
