Does anyone have thoughts on why we tend to play to the level of our opponent? I mean, more or less we do that.
I guess it could be defined as "playing to their level" but it seems to me the cornerstone issue is "relaxing". The thought of "playing to their level" seems to be another phrase, just the same meaning.
I don't know… there seems to be a thread that is trying to be split and I can't put my finger on it. But I think Scott's article, CML's comments encompass your question. Why? Who knows. But I think your question could be rephrased as, "Why do the relax? Shouldn't they be playing a full 60 minutes?" I see them relaxing, then realizing the other team isn't giving up and then they have to start working hard again to try and regain the lead. Then it's viewed by some as, "playing to the opponents level".
IMHO, they have the ability, obviously, to boat race most of the teams we've played this year, so far. And yes, I'd even put CAL on that list. Playing a full 60 minutes, not lifting the foot off the pedal and going hard-core, I think we'd have had upwards of 50 points against them. We had them in so many ways.
The mentality of the players should be, "How many points can we score against these guys IN THE SECOND HALF." Instead, it sure seems like they get a decent lead (whatever that is) and then squander it. Like they don't have to work so hard… "See mom, see dad!!! We can beat any team we want to!!!!" Except they are saying that before the game is over and the other team isn't giving up.