I wouldn’t go that far. I thought we looked like an arrogant team that almost got beat.
Your take closer then others so far.
What it really was, was this:
1. It was a TRAP game, with WSU looking past Idaho, feeling like they didn't have to show up, and that they would easily blow out Idaho, etc.
2. Point 1 was based that they really should have destroyed Idaho. But it's one thing for us fans to think, say that, and the players etc, to think that. Ok for us to think that. Less so for players to think that, not show up, etc.
3. WSU TRIED THEIR DAMNEDEST TO SNATCH DEFEAT FROM JAWS OF VICTORY.
4. Everybody on offense, EXCEPT OL(Which actually did well), screwed up.
A. Cam Ward over threw, under threw, missed 4,5 semi wide open WR's.
B. WR's didn't help Cam out by having WR's DROPPING 4,5,6 EASILY CATCHABLE 3RD DOWN INTO 1ST DOWN PASSES.
C. RB's AND WR didn't help things FUMBLING THE BALL OVER TO IDAHO.
other then that, the OL blocked well, and the RB's had awesome YPC, and awesome total yards, when they weren't FUMBLING.
And except for 2,3 MIRACLE PLAYS by Idaho's offense, WSU's defense DOMINATED IDAHO held them to 10 points.
WSU was really just BEATING THEMSELVES, SHOOTING THEMSELVES IN THE FOOT, FUMBLING BALL OVER 3 TIMES, MISSING A ABOUT 17 YARD CHIPSHOT FG, TRYING DAMNEDEST TO STEAL DEFEAT FROM JAWS OF VICTORY.
It reminded me of Leach's bowl game vs Colorado State, where DOMINATED CSU, only to fumble 3 times in row, muff the punt or kickoff reception, etc, to where CSU MIRACULOUSLY CAME BACK AND SCORED A LOT OF POINTS IN ABOUT 1,2,3 minutes.
WSU's OL, and defense DOMINATED IDAHO. Idaho didn't play good. WSU offense and special teams, tried to beat themselves, and almost succeeded.
Also what doesn't make sense is that WSU's defense DESTROYED Idaho, BUT got DESTROYED BY WSU's offense.
WSU's defense is WAY THE HELL BETTER THEN IDAHO's defense, and DESTROYED IDAHO, but yet WSU's offense DESTROYS WSU's AWESOME defense, and didn't do much against Idaho's CRAPPY defense.
How can a WSU offense do so awesome against such a awesome WSU defense, but yet do bad against a crappy Idaho defense because they were fumble happy, can't hang onto ball, can't catch balls, can't hit semi wide open WR's, etc?
It just doesn't compute, make logical sense.
WSU should have easily beat Idaho by at least 37 to 10 at minimum.
Guess it goes to show that you can't just not show up, fumble, miss chip shot 17 YARD fg's, etc, and either win or blow out your opponent, no matter how good you are, or what level opponent is or how beneath you they are.
Guess Dickert, staff needs to work on HOLDING ONTO BALL, making Chip shot fg's, and FOCUS, EFFORT, SHOWING UP, etc.
Hopefully that happens, and gets FIXED by, before WSU's next game.
If that doesn't happen WSU only wins 3,4,5 games, which would be too bad, since Cam Ward is supposed to be a top 25 QB, and since WSU SHOULD be able to win 7,8,9 wins, instead of only winning 3,4,5 games.
WSU can still win 6,7,8 wins, but to do so they will have to fix the crap they pulled, played against Idaho, and be more disciplined, focused, showing up, not missing chip shot fg's, not beating yourself, etc.
That was freaking embarrassing. At least Paul Wulf didn't have the talent(His fault), to win.
WSU has way the hell enough talent to win, and thus should easily win, instead of just barely getting by Idaho.
Like I said, Idaho is the same as Idaho State that Paul Wulf with LESS TALENT EASILY BEAT by about 47 + points.
If Paul Wulf can do that with LESS TALENT, Dickert/WSU/players, etc, SHOULD be able to come close to doing as good, winning by as big a margin as Paul Wulf did vs a Idaho, Idaho St type with LESS TALENT, since Dickert has MORE TALENT then Paul Wulf had.
I hope this opens the eyes of, awakens Dickert, WSU, players, etc, to the point where FIX things, not take things for granted, not be arrogant, not fail to show up, be focused, etc, so that they win 7,8 games like they SHOULD.
At least WSU didn't lose to Idaho a FCS Big Sky team, like how UW fuskies lost to FCS Big Sky Montana, last year, last season.