Not really...because the longtime cynics take their place and they're more than willing to offer no hope.Originally posted by nicenez:
When Moos loses the fanatic fan apathy has truly reared it's head.
Originally posted by wazzubruce:
Leach has already taken WSU to a bowl game. What did CPW do. Check his horrendous record and disgusting beat downs.
I don't think that many fans gave Wulff "all that time". Sterk and Moos did, but a majority of fans wanted Wulff out after 3 years.Originally posted by ElComanche:
It seems like some fans are always forecasting doom and gloom. I believe that Leach bounces back and the cougs will be much better next year.Hell if fands could give Wulff all that time,They can keep backing Leach for a couple of more seasons. The man is resilient and he should prevail.
Originally posted by chinookpirate:
sounds right... I could see Moos saying when he and Leach shook hands on the deal, "Just be better than Wulff"
Originally posted by wazzubruce:
Leach has already taken WSU to a bowl game. What did CPW do. Check his horrendous record and disgusting beat downs.
___________________________________________________________________________________
"Being better than Wulff"is exactly where we needed to start. Since Mike Price left this program has been in recession. Under Doba things started to slip and under Wulff it went to the gutter.
We needed someone to breath life into the program and Leach did it in year 2, and this year there were a lot of setbacks, but nothing critical.
We lost Rutgers on a muffed punt and a poor defense.
We lost Oregon when there was clearly a pass interference
We lost Cal because we didn't have a kicker/decent special teams
Senior QB gets hurt
There were a lot of bad breaks some our fault some not our fault, but really this program is MUCH better than under WUlff, and that's the first step to getting out of the gutter.
We went to a bowl game for the first time in 10 years. A DECADE we didn't have a post season.
Leach now gets to bring in new assistants to address the problems.
The people that cried Wulff didn't get 5 b*tch about Leach winning more than double and a bowl game more than Wulff did his first 3 years.
People that want instant wins are too stupid to realize the position our program was actually in, and what it faces.
.
Originally posted by chinookpirate:
you can hurl all the personal insults you want to, Tron but I will point out two salient facts:
1. Football at WSU began before Paul Wulff
And football before Wulff mustered only 9 bowls in 100 years of the program, and a losing record overall. Before Leach got here. He's brought in to get us out of that, and he has 10% of our bowl appearances already.
2. Three years ago, under a different coach this team won 4 games. Leach was left a record setting future NFL QB and in year three managed 2 FBS wins.
A record setting QB that became record setting because of his coaching. Was it Halliday or Leach putting up those big numbers? With Falk doing it 3 games in a row after Haliday's exodus Leach is the constant in that situation. I wonder is this the first time a Leach QB has set NCAA records? no. no it's not. In fact many of the records Halliday was chasing/beating were Coached by the very guy who was coaching him.
Now, Leach has taken corrective action, which is good. Let's see if he can bring in 3 quality recruiters so we can start to get this thing turned around.
Recruiting is part of it. They need to recruit, and they need to be able to coach. And that's hard to find people who can do both well and sell people on Pullman. I think he'll improve our staff position, and I think we'll get better. I mean how can we get worst on special teams? Have a kicker who just runs to our endzone and spikes it? We'll be better there, and defensively if they can slow down other teams by 10-15% even that would win us some games. We are a lot closer than people think.
Originally posted by Cougatron:
Originally posted by chinookpirate:
you can hurl all the personal insults you want to, Tron but I will point out two salient facts:
1. Football at WSU began before Paul Wulff
And football before Wulff mustered only 9 bowls in 100 years of the program, and a losing record overall. Before Leach got here. He's brought in to get us out of that, and he has 10% of our bowl appearances already. and in year 3 he won 2 games.
2. Three years ago, under a different coach this team won 4 games. Leach was left a record setting future NFL QB and in year three managed 2 FBS wins.
A record setting QB that became record setting because of his coaching. Was it Halliday or Leach putting up those big numbers? it was Halliday. Need a link? No player. NO player develops without good coaching.With Falk doing it 3 games in a row after Haliday's exodus Leach is the constant in that situation. What did Falk do, exactly, in the last game? I wonder is this the first time a Leach QB has set NCAA records? no. no it's not. In fact many of the records Halliday was chasing/beating were Coached by the very guy who was coaching him.
Now, Leach has taken corrective action, which is good. Let's see if he can bring in 3 quality recruiters so we can start to get this thing turned around.
Recruiting is part of it. No, recruiting is Most of it if we ever want something other than a fight hunger bowl in our future. Moos has said as much for years now. They need to recruit, and they need to be able to coach. Agree 100%And that's hard to find people who can do both well and sell people on Pullman. Agree 100% I think he'll improve our staff position, I sure hope so, but remember, he fired 3 of his own picks this year.and I think we'll get better. Yes, so do I I mean how can we get worst on special teams? continue recruiting at a 12-10-12 level and continue to suffer depth problems. Increase recruiting to a 5-8 level consistently and those depth problems work themselves out over time. Have a kicker who just runs to our endzone and spikes it? We'll be better there, and defensively if they can slow down other teams by 10-15% even that would win us some games. We are a lot closer than ípeople think. Yes, that's indeed what we're all hoping for.
I don't think it hit a majority until year 4. The OSU beat down in Seattle probably pushed things over the top.Originally posted by Glad Cougar:
I don't think that many fans gave Wulff "all that time". Sterk and Moos did, but a majority of fans wanted Wulff out after 3 years.Originally posted by ElComanche:
It seems like some fans are always forecasting doom and gloom. I believe that Leach bounces back and the cougs will be much better next year.Hell if fands could give Wulff all that time,They can keep backing Leach for a couple of more seasons. The man is resilient and he should prevail.
Glad Cougar
did halliday start the 2011 ASU game? I thought he came in early in the first quarter for Tuel, but i could wrong about that.Originally posted by CougEd:
he recorded a win with what was a record setting performance for a freshman at WSU at the time. He followed up that win against ASU with an almost win against Utah. He then got hurt. So it was clear Halliday had it in him.
As to Falk, he had a great game against OSU. Was that an anomaly?
Not intending to get in the middle of this argument, but from the historical perspective, there were several WSU teams of the past that would have been in a bowl had there been the same number of bowls out there as today. I can think of a couple of Walden teams, the Warren Powers team, a Bert Clark team that had winning records and would at least be good enough to go to a New Mexico Bowl. These days, you don't even need to have a winning record to get into a bowl. But yeah, we haven't really had a lot of success in the grand scheme of things.Originally posted by Cougatron:
And football before Wulff mustered only 9 bowls in 100 years of the program, and a losing record overall. Before Leach got here. He's brought in to get us out of that, and he has 10% of our bowl appearances already.