He’s the GD worst, I can’t believe Fox paid him that boatload of money. Waste of money anyways even if he was good but he’s absolutely terrible.Fck tom brady. That's all I have to say about that
He’s the GD worst, I can’t believe Fox paid him that boatload of money. Waste of money anyways even if he was good but he’s absolutely terrible.
I never thought I’d say it but his voice is more annoying to me that Kermit Mahomes.
That’s what’s stupid about them paying guys that kind of scratch…if the games interesting fans will tune into it. And most NFL games are competitive so most aren’t getting turned off early. Romo is grossly overpaid as well. It doesn’t seem like it would pencil for the networks, are advertisers salivating to pay more for ads because Brady is on the mic?Those promotional commercials they have featuring him grinding it out to portray him as a hard worker overcoming doubts about his broadcasting chops annoy the hell out of me.
As if fans tune into games for the commentators, espicially him. Hes not good, or particularly insightful. Ive heard that part of the problem is that since he's part owner he is restricted access to the pregame meetings with the teams he's going to be covering. If true, it shows.
Here's my brief list of those MUCH better than Brady at this:
Collinsworth, Aikman, Sanchez, Olson, Romo. I suppose i could list about 20 more. Taihtsat