Have we ever said that about OSU before, Kurt?Protecting the league’s top team
They didn't protect UO
And when the conference office called the replay booth, mid-USC game in 2018, to "instructed" regarding targeting, it was an innocent and isolated aberration, not part of a pattern to influence officiating! We suffer from Lance Armstrong syndrome in this country. We live in a state of denial, until we are beaten over the head with irrefutable evidence.Protecting the league’s top team
I can understand that call against Marsh. I didn't have a problem with that one.Listening to the OSU broadcast today, even their announcers said WSU got screwed twice on PI non-calls in the first half...with the one not called on the end zone pas to Harris being incredibly egregious. They also felt the fake punt pass should have been called PI against the Cougars but were quick to mention that the Beavs got away with the 2 non calls earlier. OSU announcers did not say anything about the call against Marsh on that last drive.
Glad Cougar
Agree, How. Any time a DB is in the receiver's face and does not look back, he is setting himself up for that call.I can understand that call against Marsh. I didn't have a problem with that one.
Drives me nuts every time I see that. It's a technique that should be drilled into the kids head starting in pee wee ball!Agree, How. Any time a DB is in the receiver's face and does not look back, he is setting himself up for that call.
Officiating was typically terrible and wildly one-sided against WSU even though the numbers didn’t look at bad. The PI calls and PIs missed were atrocious and in key situations that caused point swings. And yes there were a handful of missed holding calls that were pretty blatant. With a mashing run team like that the line kind of gets blurred when OLinemen lean on, wrap up then fall on them. It’s not blocking but they let run heavy teams get away with a lot of that. It’s quite impressive they overcame the refs yesterday to win.Plethora of holding by OSU O-Line? The flagrant PI non-call against Harris in the end zone? I felt this was a very one sided reffing job. Not to complain really, more of like an observation with resentment attached to it.
Agree, How. Any time a DB is in the receiver's face and does not look back, he is setting himself up for that call.
There’s no face guarding in college football. He doesn’t need to look back. He was running stride for stride. It was a terrible call. If you see the replay from the end zone camera OSU is extending his arm harm trying to create separation.
The fake punt non PI was the right call. On that play as long as they aren’t holding which would be a penalty either way they are allowed to make contact because they are usually blocking that gunner on a punt and they have their back to the play. There’s no way for that player to know if it’s a punt or throw. That said, Pac 12 refs…surprised they didn’t blow that one too.Listening to the OSU broadcast today, even their announcers said WSU got screwed twice on PI non-calls in the first half...with the one not called on the end zone pas to Harris being incredibly egregious. They also felt the fake punt pass should have been called PI against the Cougars but were quick to mention that the Beavs got away with the 2 non calls earlier. OSU announcers did not say anything about the call against Marsh on that last drive.
Glad Cougar
I completely agree and understand what you're saying, AG. However, the chance of getting a PI drops dramatically if you turn your head and make a play at the ball, regardless of what the rules stateThis x1000 - Face guarding is not a penalty in college football! That play would be PI in the NFL.
A good receiver doesn’t show the ball is on the way until the last mili second so just turning around and making a play isn’t as easy as it sounds.I completely agree and understand what you're saying, AG. However, the chance of getting a PI drops dramatically if you turn your head and make a play at the ball, regardless of what the rules state
These are, after all, Pac refs we have to deal with. Not the sharpest tacks in the box.
Which is exactly why I was a lineman...lol. As my old man used to say, strong back, weak mind😁A good receiver doesn’t show the ball is on the way until the last mili second so just turning around and making a play isn’t as easy as it sounds.
They don’t have a face guard call in the college game . You can’t play it better than marsh did. When are in that position he did exactly what you are taught, get the ball out with your inside armAgree, How. Any time a DB is in the receiver's face and does not look back, he is setting himself up for that call.
Several of you on this string have made this point. I assume you are correct from a "rules" standpoint; frankly, I have a hard time keeping up with the differences in the rules at the midget, HS, college and pro levels. It has been a long, long time since I played and officiated at the HS level. However, the missed calls will continue when no attempt is made to look back, because in real time it is too hard for the official to see it all clearly...and if a guy never looks back, he can't excuse contact (or perceived contact) by indicating that he was also going for the ball. Sure, you might get it reversed on replay if there is an angle that shows no contact. But it is poor practice, inviting a flag, and I guess we'll just have to agree to disagree on whether "you can't play it better". Rules that make missed calls likely (or even just "more likely") are often not good rules.They don’t have a face guard call in the college game . You can’t play it better than marsh did. When are in that position he did exactly what you are taught, get the ball out with your inside arm
You may have been the one that mentioned before that WSU seems to suffer a bias against us in actually getting PI calls in our favor because we are pass-heavy and that refs are not going to call PI against our opponents over and over and over. However, I'm hard-pressed to actually recall a single time when we have benefited from a PI call. Like really, when was the last time? I know its happened, but what do we get..Like 3 per season? That's all I have to say about thatSeveral of you on this string have made this point. I assume you are correct from a "rules" standpoint; frankly, I have a hard time keeping up with the differences in the rules at the midget, HS, college and pro levels. It has been a long, long time since I played and officiated at the HS level. However, the missed calls will continue when no attempt is made to look back, because in real time it is too hard for the official to see it all clearly...and if a guy never looks back, he can't excuse contact (or perceived contact) by indicating that he was also going for the ball. Sure, you might get it reversed on replay if there is an angle that shows no contact. But it is poor practice, inviting a flag, and I guess we'll just have to agree to disagree on whether "you can't play it better". Rules that make missed calls likely (or even just "more likely") are often not good rules.
Walden on his radio calls objected to 50% or greater PI calls even those benefitting WSU.You may have been the one that mentioned before that WSU seems to suffer a bias against us in actually getting PI calls in our favor because we are pass-heavy and that refs are not going to call PI against our opponents over and over and over. However, I'm hard-pressed to actually recall a single time when we have benefited from a PI call. Like really, when was the last time? I know its happened, but what do we get..Like 3 per season? That's all I have to say about that
.
Who was it that said "3 things can result from a pass and 2 of them are bad"?Walden on his radio calls objected to 50% or greater PI calls even those benefitting WSU.
He objected to how PI was being called mostly. And partly his old school Dixie pass hating outlook - old school southerners objected to the passing game. Odd for a former QB
That sounds like Woody, but it may not have originated with him. All those guys were great for repeating good lines from other people.Who was it that said "3 things can result from a pass and 2 of them are bad"?
Bo, Woody?
Hillary Clinton when talking to Bill.Who was it that said "3 things can result from a pass and 2 of them are bad"?
Bo, Woody?
I thought it was 4 things and 3 bad?Who was it that said "3 things can result from a pass and 2 of them are bad"?
Bo, Woody?
After doing a quick Google, it seems as though Darrell Royal at Texas in 1962 was first credited. Makes sense as those were the old wishbone days of the SWC.That sounds like Woody, but it may not have originated with him. All those guys were great for repeating good lines from other people.
Actually that is how it is taught so when you look back you don’t lose contact with the man . Marsh got his hand in there and got the ball out as it cam down .Several of you on this string have made this point. I assume you are correct from a "rules" standpoint; frankly, I have a hard time keeping up with the differences in the rules at the midget, HS, college and pro levels. It has been a long, long time since I played and officiated at the HS level. However, the missed calls will continue when no attempt is made to look back, because in real time it is too hard for the official to see it all clearly...and if a guy never looks back, he can't excuse contact (or perceived contact) by indicating that he was also going for the ball. Sure, you might get it reversed on replay if there is an angle that shows no contact. But it is poor practice, inviting a flag, and I guess we'll just have to agree to disagree on whether "you can't play it better". Rules that make missed calls likely (or even just "more likely") are often not good rules.
I was a huge fan of the holding call on Kingston. After the call he had a dumbfounded look on his face lik....."Huh?"Plethora of holding by OSU O-Line? The flagrant PI non-call against Harris in the end zone? I felt this was a very one sided reffing job. Not to complain really, more of like an observation with resentment attached to it.