ADVERTISEMENT

Baseball: Pete Rose ban lifted

Coug90

Hall Of Fame
Jan 17, 2012
11,225
5,872
113
Dumb that it took this long but glad he will finally get his day. Sad he won’t be there to celebrate it.

Baseball is I think by far the weirdest of all sports when it comes to history and tradition. Like these voters who won’t vote for an obvious hall of famer on a first ballot.
 
  • Like
Reactions: UberCougars
Dumb that it took this long but glad he will finally get his day. Sad he won’t be there to celebrate it.

Baseball is I think by far the weirdest of all sports when it comes to history and tradition. Like these voters who won’t vote for an obvious hall of famer on a first ballot.
Funny to hear “it took this long” for Rose. The black Sox also had their ban lifted today. They’ve been waiting a lot longer, and some of them were probably more innocent than Rose.
 
Funny to hear “it took this long” for Rose. The black Sox also had their ban lifted today. They’ve been waiting a lot longer, and some of them were probably more innocent than Rose.
True. Rose is certainly more notable as the hit king though. Baseball does some stupid shit.
 
  • Like
Reactions: UberCougars
Pete Rose had some Karl Malone-type of behavior. 10/10 bad dude.
I’m not familiar with all of the details. Being on the road 100 nights out of the year doesn’t lend itself to choirboy behavior especially in those days. . Rose, Garvey, Boggs…STDs we’re probably circulating more than Steroids did in the 90s
 
I’m not familiar with all of the details. Being on the road 100 nights out of the year doesn’t lend itself to choirboy behavior especially in those days. . Rose, Garvey, Boggs…STDs we’re probably circulating more than Steroids did in the 90s
My answer to just about any argument to exclude someone from the HOF is the same: Ty Cobb.

By nearly all accounts, he was an awful human being. He was a dirty player, he assaulted fans in the stands (and on the street), was an avowed racist, and he bet on games. But he was in the inaugural HOF class, and he remains in the hall. If he's judged only based on what he did on the field, then nobody else should be judged based on off the field either.
 
Personal opinions aside, if gambling on your own sport/ team is a lifetime ban, then its a lifetime bad. I find less integrity in lifting the ban than the original ban to begin with.

So now are we to believe that now you can bet on your own team and get in? What is the messaging here? Is this a mea culpa for getting it wrong for so long?
 
  • Like
Reactions: cr8zyncalif
My answer to just about any argument to exclude someone from the HOF is the same: Ty Cobb.

By nearly all accounts, he was an awful human being. He was a dirty player, he assaulted fans in the stands (and on the street), was an avowed racist, and he bet on games. But he was in the inaugural HOF class, and he remains in the hall. If he's judged only based on what he did on the field, then nobody else should be judged based on off the field either.
True but baseball never judged players for being “bad”. Rule #1 is “Do not bet on baseball.” Be a bad guy? Whatever. Lot’s of bad guys. Hurt the “integrity of the sport” then we have a problem. It was and probably still is crystal clear.

Rose is a HOF, but hard IMO to feel sorry for him when he knew the rules, broke them, and lied about it. All that said, no issue with him being in the HOF.
 
True but baseball never judged players for being “bad”. Rule #1 is “Do not bet on baseball.” Be a bad guy? Whatever. Lot’s of bad guys. Hurt the “integrity of the sport” then we have a problem. It was and probably still is crystal clear.

Rose is a HOF, but hard IMO to feel sorry for him when he knew the rules, broke them, and lied about it. All that said, no issue with him being in the HOF.
True…although at least to me, rule #1 is- no cheating. I have less issue with Rose in the HOF than I do with the steroid freaks of the 90s.

Even with those guys, I accept that steroids didn’t make them better fielders and didn’t help put the bat on the ball. My bigger concern is that they were knowingly pursuing an unnatural advantage, and most of them also lied about it.
 
I’m not familiar with all of the details. Being on the road 100 nights out of the year doesn’t lend itself to choirboy behavior especially in those days. . Rose, Garvey, Boggs…STDs we’re probably circulating more than Steroids did in the 90s
When he is 33 and the girl is 14, he can rot in piss.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Coug1990
True…although at least to me, rule #1 is- no cheating. I have less issue with Rose in the HOF than I do with the steroid freaks of the 90s.

Even with those guys, I accept that steroids didn’t make them better fielders and didn’t help put the bat on the ball. My bigger concern is that they were knowingly pursuing an unnatural advantage, and most of them also lied about it.
PEDs are difficult for me to parse through because it’s so difficult to know who was & wasn’t doing it. MLB didn’t even have a policy around steroids for a long time. So many players I never thought would do it did it.

MLB had a gambling policy for 100+ years. I guess that’s the difference for me. It was on the wall of every MLB facility. Rose could have gambled, just not on baseball let alone his own team. If he hadn’t gamble in such a way that was so obvious and obnoxious he probably never gets banned.

I do understand your point of view though and while he broke one of the only rules MLB seemed to care about (I don’t believe any sport really cares about PEDs) Rose is without a doubt a HOFer.
 
PEDs are difficult for me to parse through because it’s so difficult to know who was & wasn’t doing it. MLB didn’t even have a policy around steroids for a long time. So many players I never thought would do it did it.

MLB had a gambling policy for 100+ years. I guess that’s the difference for me. It was on the wall of every MLB facility. Rose could have gambled, just not on baseball let alone his own team. If he hadn’t gamble in such a way that was so obvious and obnoxious he probably never gets banned.

I do understand your point of view though and while he broke one of the only rules MLB seemed to care about (I don’t believe any sport really cares about PEDs) Rose is without a doubt a HOFer.
Not just “who,” but “when?” I think that McGwire was playing without them when he first hit the league, but started later (I’m willing to blame Canseco). I have little evidence of that, other than his general physique over the years, and his transformation isn’t as obvious as that of Bonds. Personally, I consider all of their accomplishments to be tainted, whether it was explicitly against the rules or not.
 
Personal opinions aside, if gambling on your own sport/ team is a lifetime ban, then its a lifetime bad. I find less integrity in lifting the ban than the original ban to begin with.

So now are we to believe that now you can bet on your own team and get in? What is the messaging here? Is this a mea culpa for getting it wrong for so long?
Once again we must decide whether words have meaning. Rose was banned for life, right? It was a lifetime ban, so when the life ends the ban becomes moot. AFAIK, it was a lifetime ban, not a forever ban, and the ban performed as designed. It stopped Pete Rose from getting the honor and adulation that he wanted, and now he can be admitted to the HOF for his on the field accomplishments.
 
Once again we must decide whether words have meaning. Rose was banned for life, right? It was a lifetime ban, so when the life ends the ban becomes moot. AFAIK, it was a lifetime ban, not a forever ban, and the ban performed as designed. It stopped Pete Rose from getting the honor and adulation that he wanted, and now he can be admitted to the HOF for his on the field accomplishments.
Nah, f*ck Pete Rose.
 
I didn’t know he messed around with kids. Sorta makes the 4000 hits irrelevant if true.
I did not know this either (link below).

As far as gambling in general, I never understood what the big deal is. As long as you aren't betting for your team to lose, which Rose denies he ever did.


 
I did not know this either (link below).

As far as gambling in general, I never understood what the big deal is. As long as you aren't betting for your team to lose, which Rose denies he ever did.


I had no idea about that either. I posted above baseball doesn't care about players being "bad", but that's obviously a different line in the sand.

On gambling, why does it matter even if you are betting on teams to win? It's a definite conflict of interest that likely impacts a manager's decisions. Have your ace go deeper in the game or play someone who is injured. How about when he doesn't bet at all? Isn't that a signal? It's like saying it's ok if a player shaves points as long as they don't throw the game.
 
I had no idea about that either. I posted above baseball doesn't care about players being "bad", but that's obviously a different line in the sand.

On gambling, why does it matter even if you are betting on teams to win? It's a definite conflict of interest that likely impacts a manager's decisions. Have your ace go deeper in the game or play someone who is injured. How about when he doesn't bet at all? Isn't that a signal? It's like saying it's ok if a player shaves points as long as they don't throw the game.

Pete Rose and other sources claim that Pete Rose NEVER bet against his team, and only bet on his team to win.

Now that could as you said could cause a manager, Pete Rose to play injured players, etc, like what you said.

But that doesn't jive with sources that said Pete Rose was a good, highly skilled manager, that didn't do things like purposely playing injured players in order to win games, win bets, etc.

Pete Rose was not a saint, had his bad vices, problems, addictions, etc, and one of those was betting on his own team to WIN, and while bad, and while still technically against the rules, was not as bad as the lots make it out to be.

Pete Rose broke the rules and should have been punished. And people probably shouldn't feel bad for him.

But Pete Rose's Ban should have been lifted right before he died, with no fan fare.

Waiting until long after he died, probably semi went semi too far.

There are probably some players a lot worse then Pete Rose who either were not banned, or if were banned, wasn't lifelong ban, or if lifelong ban, ended up in the Hall of Fame anyways, despite being bad, and probably worse then Pete Rose.

Some of those Hall of Fame players probably had connections to the Mob, Mafia, and may have caused, even if only indirectly cause murders to happen, etc.

At least Pete Rose isn't guilty of Murder, like some might be in the Hall of Fame.
 
Pete Rose and other sources claim that Pete Rose NEVER bet against his team, and only bet on his team to win.

Now that could as you said could cause a manager, Pete Rose to play injured players, etc, like what you said.

But that doesn't jive with sources that said Pete Rose was a good, highly skilled manager, that didn't do things like purposely playing injured players in order to win games, win bets, etc.

Pete Rose was not a saint, had his bad vices, problems, addictions, etc, and one of those was betting on his own team to WIN, and while bad, and while still technically against the rules, was not as bad as the lots make it out to be.

Pete Rose broke the rules and should have been punished. And people probably shouldn't feel bad for him.

But Pete Rose's Ban should have been lifted right before he died, with no fan fare.

Waiting until long after he died, probably semi went semi too far.

There are probably some players a lot worse then Pete Rose who either were not banned, or if were banned, wasn't lifelong ban, or if lifelong ban, ended up in the Hall of Fame anyways, despite being bad, and probably worse then Pete Rose.

Some of those Hall of Fame players probably had connections to the Mob, Mafia, and may have caused, even if only indirectly cause murders to happen, etc.

At least Pete Rose isn't guilty of Murder, like some might be in the Hall of Fame.
Fair enough. I also don’t believe Rose committed murder.
 
I had no idea about that either. I posted above baseball doesn't care about players being "bad", but that's obviously a different line in the sand.

On gambling, why does it matter even if you are betting on teams to win? It's a definite conflict of interest that likely impacts a manager's decisions. Have your ace go deeper in the game or play someone who is injured. How about when he doesn't bet at all? Isn't that a signal? It's like saying it's ok if a player shaves points as long as they don't throw the game.
Hah! Clearly you were not a Baseball pitcher like the Athletic Loyal one. How often does a pitcher want to be pulled and denied? Close to never, unless they get hurt then duh. I never wanted to get pulled. Of course, as the Ace on understaffed HS and Legion teams, if I could lift my arm I was in. And stayed in. In fact, I think I was only pulled once.

Edit - reminds me of Randy Johnson in the '95 playoffs. Out of the pen on 2 days rest.


Edit 2 - I was actually thinking of the Yankee playoff game where he came on in relief on one days rest......link then relevant excerpt


The Final Drama

With 78 percent of all Western Washington households watching on television and 57,411 at the Kingdome, the Yankees took a 4-2 lead into the eighth inning. But Griffey made it 4-3 with his fifth home run of the series, and a bases-loaded walk by Yankees pitcher David Cone (b. 1963) tied the score at 4-4. That brought baseball’s best reliever, Mariano Rivera (b. 1969), into the game when the stakes were highest. But the Mariners had a reliever to match him. Johnson, the league’s most dominating starting pitcher, had volunteered to pitch in relief despite having had only one day’s rest. The sight of their 6-foot-10 ace coming in from the bullpen to pitch the ninth inning electrified the already amped-up crowd. He retired the Yankees’ best three hitters, but Rivera and Jack McDowell (b. 1966), a starter who like Johnson was thrown into an emergency relief role, mowed down the M’s in the ninth and tenth.

The Yankees took a 5-4 lead in the 11th. Seattle’s miracle season was on the line, but it wasn’t over. Cora bunted safely for a single and Griffey singled too, advancing Cora to third. That set up the biggest moment in Mariner history. Edgar Martinez, the American League batting champion, hit a line drive into leftfield, easily scoring Cora and sending Griffey around third, hell-bent for home. He beat the throw to the plate, giving Seattle a 6-5 victory,
 
Last edited:
Hah! Clearly you were not a Baseball pitcher like the Athletic Loyal one. How often does a pitcher want to be pulled and denied? Close to never, unless they get hurt then duh. I never wanted to get pulled.
All of which has nothing to do with a manager making decisions based on placing a bet on their team.
 
How often does a pitcher want to be pulled and denied?
This isn’t confined to pitchers. Or to baseball. I never wanted to come out of any game. Didn’t matter if we were up or down 30. Freshmen want to play? That’s what JV is for. You want to put one of them at 2nd? Fine, go ahead. I’ll go to 1st, or I’ll catch. You want them to play DE? Fine, I’ll move to LB. But I’m not coming out. There’s nothing to do on the sideline.
 
This isn’t confined to pitchers. Or to baseball. I never wanted to come out of any game. Didn’t matter if we were up or down 30. Freshmen want to play? That’s what JV is for. You want to put one of them at 2nd? Fine, go ahead. I’ll go to 1st, or I’ll catch. You want them to play DE? Fine, I’ll move to LB. But I’m not coming out. There’s nothing to do on the sideline.
Being pulled and denied sounds like something Loyal likes to do on a cross country trip with some less than savory ladies of the night.
 
Being pulled and denied sounds like something Loyal likes to do on a cross country trip with some less than savory ladies of the night.
Hadn't thought of that particular application, but again...I'm not coming out until I'm ready. And I'm definitely not getting subbed out for a freshman.
 
Being pulled and denied sounds like something Loyal likes to do on a cross country trip with some less than savory ladies of the night.
Ok, enough of this false rumor. I LOST my wallet when I tripped over my dog at a park in Dillon, MT. There was no truckstop, no ladies of any kind. You guys just love to make shit up. How about some of you Karen's tell a funny story about one of your own (preferably drunken) mishaps? Maybe you are all so boring and dull that you have never had one? Or you are too chickenshit to post it? Hah. I scoff at all of you pussies. The Colorful and Fun-Loving Loyal One has many, many crazy stories he could share. Not even counting all the woman stories I could tell. :) But too bad. No soup for you.
 
Hah! Clearly you were not a Baseball pitcher like the Athletic Loyal one. How often does a pitcher want to be pulled and denied? Close to never, unless they get hurt then duh. I never wanted to get pulled. Of course, as the Ace on understaffed HS and Legion teams, if I could lift my arm I was in. And stayed in. In fact, I think I was only pulled once.

Edit - reminds me of Randy Johnson in the '95 playoffs. Out of the pen on 2 days rest.


Edit 2 - I was actually thinking of the Yankee playoff game where he came on in relief on one days rest......link then relevant excerpt


The Final Drama

With 78 percent of all Western Washington households watching on television and 57,411 at the Kingdome, the Yankees took a 4-2 lead into the eighth inning. But Griffey made it 4-3 with his fifth home run of the series, and a bases-loaded walk by Yankees pitcher David Cone (b. 1963) tied the score at 4-4. That brought baseball’s best reliever, Mariano Rivera (b. 1969), into the game when the stakes were highest. But the Mariners had a reliever to match him. Johnson, the league’s most dominating starting pitcher, had volunteered to pitch in relief despite having had only one day’s rest. The sight of their 6-foot-10 ace coming in from the bullpen to pitch the ninth inning electrified the already amped-up crowd. He retired the Yankees’ best three hitters, but Rivera and Jack McDowell (b. 1966), a starter who like Johnson was thrown into an emergency relief role, mowed down the M’s in the ninth and tenth.

The Yankees took a 5-4 lead in the 11th. Seattle’s miracle season was on the line, but it wasn’t over. Cora bunted safely for a single and Griffey singled too, advancing Cora to third. That set up the biggest moment in Mariner history. Edgar Martinez, the American League batting champion, hit a line drive into leftfield, easily scoring Cora and sending Griffey around third, hell-bent for home. He beat the throw to the plate, giving Seattle a 6-5 victory,
You could just feel the electricity in the Kingdome when the Big Unit got up and started throwing in the pen down the left field line. I don't think that place was EVER louder than when he started out of the bullpen and started striding toward the mound! It was insane, crazy, electric and it made the hair on the back of my neck stand up. What an incredible moment, a memory of a lifetime, we were fortunate to be there.
 
You could just feel the electricity in the Kingdome when the Big Unit got up and started throwing in the pen down the left field line. I don't think that place was EVER louder than when he started out of the bullpen and started striding toward the mound! It was insane, crazy, electric and it made the hair on the back of my neck stand up. What an incredible moment, a memory of a lifetime, we were fortunate to be there.
“Welcome To The Jungle”, remember?

I had no idea the old Kingdome sound system could get that loud!
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT