I wonder if George can be fired for cause like college coaches can be? I think there is a strong case to be made that he was working more for the benefit of the departing schools than he was for the conference when he was trying to get all the schools together for the board meeting, knowing (or certainly SHOULD have known) that those ten schools no longer had a right to be on the board. And if you are not working for the best interests of the PAC 12 Conference, then why the eff do we need to keep paying you?
Something we all need to keep in mind is to keep out desire for revenge in check. Yes, I, as much as anyone, would LOVE to have the opportunity to totally buttfork all the traitor schools, and use gravel as a lubricant, but some caution is needed. Recall that Libey said that our actions needed to be fair. He said fair, not equal, which should be an important distinction. Without guidance/definition from him of what he meant, we need to be careful.
If no school had left the conference, we would have had a media deal worth about $31,000,000 for each school (assuming reports are correct). I think we will end up with considerably less than that for the next two years without a full conference, and likely also going forward, therefore those 10 schools have caused harm to WSU and OSU. Fair treatment would be to ensure that WSU and OSU end up with media compensation equal to what the leaving schools will be getting. Therefore there will be no obligation to split all the funds equally due to the harm caused to the Conference by their departures. That harm will be able to be quantified!