Looks like it’s accurate, but it’s all in the way you present the data.
Not sure where Statista pulled the 2021 data, the FBI only shows up to 2019. Percentages seem to hold up though.
https://ucr.fbi.gov/crime-in-the-u....019/tables/expanded-homicide-data-table-8.xls
So, rifles accounted for 364 homicides in 2019. There were 10,258 firearm homicides and 13,927 total homicides.
So, rifles made up 2.6% of total homicides. They also were 3.5% of total firearm homicides.
Handguns were used 6,368 times, making up 62% of firearm homicides and 45.7% of all homicides. We have to realize that handguns are what’s most often used in gang shootings, in domestic situations, police shootings, robberies, etc….and they’re also sometimes involved in mass shootings. They don’t register as high on our radar because it’s usually just 1 or 2 people at a time, and they’re pretty easily dismissed as gang members or druggies, and the media doesn’t spend much time on them.
What I really notice in the linked table is that in every year shown, there are more people killed with blunt objects or with bare hands than with rifles. Beating someone to death - especially with your hands - takes a lot more hate and determination (and time) than shooting with a rifle. Yet those numbers are roughly double the rifle deaths.
Now, the big unknown is the “firearm, type not stated” column. That number is big enough to seriously skew the result, but the reports weren’t descriptive enough. That’s a number that needs to get dialed in a lot better, because as presented it really looks like all the emphasis on rifles is seriously misplaced. It would make as much sense to ban clubs and hammers.