ADVERTISEMENT

ESPN Recruiting Article

I caught that, but given the longevity referenced, along with the particular stats made me think OSU.
 
Originally posted by wulffui:
I caught that, but given the longevity referenced, along with the particular stats made me think OSU.
It's not WSU. It was referenced that the school had a 1000 yard receiver 6 out of 8 years. We know that is not the case at WSU.



This post was edited on 2/2 2:57 PM by Coug1990
 
Originally posted by Coug1990:

Originally posted by wulffui:
I caught that, but given the longevity referenced, along with the particular stats made me think OSU.
It's now WSU. It was referenced that the school had a 1000 yard receiver 6 out of 8 years. We know that is not the case at WSU.
Maybe he was fudging on that too?



You're probably right on OSU.
 
Originally posted by dgibbons:
Originally posted by Coug1990:

Originally posted by wulffui:
I caught that, but given the longevity referenced, along with the particular stats made me think OSU.
It's now WSU. It was referenced that the school had a 1000 yard receiver 6 out of 8 years. We know that is not the case at WSU.
Maybe he was fudging on that too?

You're probably right on OSU.
I could see how you could make that mistake with all the 1000 yard receivers under the previous regime.
 
Originally posted by Coug1990:

Originally posted by dgibbons:

Originally posted by Coug1990:


Originally posted by wulffui:
I caught that, but given the longevity referenced, along with the particular stats made me think OSU.
It's now WSU. It was referenced that the school had a 1000 yard receiver 6 out of 8 years. We know that is not the case at WSU.
Maybe he was fudging on that too?

You're probably right on OSU.
I could see how you could make that mistake with all the 1000 yard receivers under the previous regime.
I actually had Gibson and Hill in mind, and going back to 2004. Throw in Wilson and we might get there.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT