I told you. See the table above.
And post a video of your veins in your head bulging out.
Not a table. Your actual tax returns. Don't just tell us how much you make Donald. PROVE IT. All talk.
I told you. See the table above.
And post a video of your veins in your head bulging out.
Kind of an odd take. Given WSU’s non-conference... I think the Cougs would get the UCF treatment if they went undefeated this year. Certainly not as a 1-loss team. Clemson is in, then they’d put in a 1-loss SEC, B10 and B12 team over the Cougs.
You won’t have to worry about that obviously. But let’s say the Cougs had a shot at the playoff... wouldn’t you want them to have played someone worth mentioning? Or do you believe they’ll never be good enough and just getting to a decent bowl is good enough? That’s kind of what you’re inferring, no?
An undefeated PAC 12 champ being excluded from the playoff in favor of a one loss team would be a huge deal. Regardless of which school it was. The 9 game conference schedule should carry more weight than 8 right?
I think there would be a serious discussion about it given the non-conference opponents the Cougs scheduled.
Not a table. Your actual tax returns. Don't just tell us how much you make Donald. PROVE IT. All talk.
Did you take too many shots to the head? Or too many shots this morning?
I think there would be a serious discussion about it given the non-conference opponents the Cougs scheduled. WSU just doesn’t have the respect that UW, USC, Oregon, Stanford would get in the same situation.
Neither. Are you gonna post your tax returns and prove you're a rich guy? Doubt it. Liar.
I told you time and again. See the top bracket.
Or lump me in with 96's poop smearers. I don't care.
Otherwise, I'll assume the answer to my last question is "both"
WSU needs winnable games. Doesn't matter against who. Strength of schedule doesn't matter in rankings. Not like basketball. So why try and schedule P5 teams? Doesn't have to be FCS teams. But SDSU, UNLV, SJSU, UH, Fresno, Reno, etc are all easy trips.
Again, this isn't about you and what you think of culture. This is about winning. Your opinion of Vegas is entirely irrelevant. Do you think Saban sits down with the AD and talks about the cultural enjoyment of the fans for their non con games??? You're delusional.
Lol, this had me rolling!
And that's the problem. It's not like Alabama and Clemson are loading up their non conference schedules. Same for the rest of their leagues. You hold one conference accountable for playing a soft schedule of 9 league games, yet you give a pass to other schools for playing less league games and maybe even losing one of them.
At some point the PAC 12 either needs to play 8 league games and stack the deck in their favor too OR the other conferences need to add a 9th league game. We will see how many losses the SEC teams have then.
If it were up to me, I'd have the PAC 12 either play 8 league games or play all 11. And if you made me pick one or the other, let's play all 11. Get our boys home at a reasonable hour and ready for the next weeks game.
I told you time and again. See the top bracket.
Or lump me in with 96's poop smearers. I don't care.
Otherwise, I'll assume the answer to my last question is "both"
Remember to tip your waitress. Biggs says I'm too poor to.
Well... Bama did play Duke.
Clemson played Texas A&M.
You don’t need to schedule a gauntlet... just one OOC P5 opponent.
I think you're a fraud. Post your tax returns and show us all.
What value does a loss to Wisconsin have if you finish just shy of bowl eligibility?
There is no moral victory league or national championship.
Pretty sure I just stated I don't care what you think. I was willing to temporarily take on poop smearrer. But that doesn't seem satisfactory.
I'll be thinking about you over some fine European cuisine.
Actually, I won't be thinking of you at all. I'm truthful that way.
The fact that you race to your computer to respond to my posts tells me that you do think about me.
Olive Garden isn't fine cuisine. But go with it.
I think you can schedule with fan experience in mind if your program is in the toilet and you want to offer the fans something to look forward to. Other than that, you gotta schedule to win with at most 1 game that has a little potential risk, but you should still most likely win 8 of 10 times.Your Saban comment doesn't make sense......given the fact that Alabama hasn't played a true road OOC game since 2011.
FWIW, I agree that you schedule based on your expectations and you schedule to win.....not worry about the fan experience. In a perfect world, I would like our AD to work out a schedule that does provide some diversity in experience.
I do hope that Coug fans go to Manhattan and Lawrence when the time comes. KSU is a kindred spirit but with better tailgating. Aggieville is awesome and has to be experienced. Imagine all the bars in Pullman squeezed into a six block area. Lawrence is a bit stuck up but Mass Street is all right (if overpriced). The KC metro area is nearby and the Power and Light District is a pretty great experience. Both of those games should be winnable and fun.
I'm not a fan of the trips like Wisconsin where it feels like the trip to Pullman will be bought out and we end up on the short end of the stick. Doesn't matter if it's a fun experience, getting screwed over by the opposing AD isn't worth it.
Well... Bama did play Duke.
Clemson played Texas A&M.
You don’t need to schedule a gauntlet... just one OOC P5 opponent.