Whenever we are going through these coaching changes, and wondering what the realistic ceiling is for WSU athletics, we need to look at ISU. They are clearly one of our peers- the first land grant school in the nation, remote from any major urban center in the rural midwest, playing in a power 5 conference. Like us their alumni and donors are heavily based in agriculture- no law or medical school. This year they were pretty much our equal in football (ended up in the same bowl and lost by 2), won the Big 12 Mens BBall Tournament, finished second in the Big 12 Woman's Tournament, on their way to the NCAA wrestling tournament, with several other very respectable non-revenue programs sprinkled in. Like us they are pretty lean, with just 16 varsity sports (Stanford has 37). No men's soccer (but they do have wrestling), no women's lacrosse or sand volleyball (but they do have gymnastics). When the brackets come out tomorrow, there will not be too many schools with teams in both tournaments who also had a football team in a bowl game....
Just something to think about while waiting for football and women's soccer to start. And realistically, as an athletic department they are SO FAR ahead of Nebraska it isn't even a conversation (for anyone living in the present and not in the late 1980's), so they are a blueprint for Moos to shoot for too.
Just something to think about while waiting for football and women's soccer to start. And realistically, as an athletic department they are SO FAR ahead of Nebraska it isn't even a conversation (for anyone living in the present and not in the late 1980's), so they are a blueprint for Moos to shoot for too.