Very good article w/ new details not public.
1. They had a UCLA deal that could have kept them here if we would have given them more cash. Oregon said no.
2. On the $30M getting nixed, one of the schools, through it's professor, felt they could get $50M.
3. They had a linear deal on the table that got pulled when CU jumped.
4. The Apple deal could have had some linear components but was shut down due to UW/Oregon bailing to the Big-10.
All in all, I question how much information CU was giving the Big-12. Feels like this deal got sabotaged on many levels.
www.latimes.com
1. They had a UCLA deal that could have kept them here if we would have given them more cash. Oregon said no.
2. On the $30M getting nixed, one of the schools, through it's professor, felt they could get $50M.
3. They had a linear deal on the table that got pulled when CU jumped.
4. The Apple deal could have had some linear components but was shut down due to UW/Oregon bailing to the Big-10.
All in all, I question how much information CU was giving the Big-12. Feels like this deal got sabotaged on many levels.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/594a6/594a666da491e5c7d89767db954052edcbdbe097" alt="www.latimes.com"
Inside the Pac-12 collapse: Four surprising moments that crushed the conference
How did the Pac-12 die? These surprising decisions by USC, Oregon, Washington and others thwarted efforts to save the conference.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e9320/e9320cce85547781dcbdfe329cd129f69de439dd" alt="www.latimes.com"
Last edited: