ADVERTISEMENT

OT: any pilots here....RE: DC plane crash...

ttowncoug

Hall Of Fame
Sep 9, 2001
5,153
1,075
113
Curious why in the world they would let a helicopter take off in "direct landing lanes" from the tower.

Also curious if the plane itself has any "warning lights" going off that there is a helicopter in front of you.

Seems like a massive mistake and I suspect this is going to point to tragic mistake by air traffic control.
 
Curious why in the world they would let a helicopter take off in "direct landing lanes" from the tower.

Also curious if the plane itself has any "warning lights" going off that there is a helicopter in front of you.

Seems like a massive mistake and I suspect this is going to point to tragic mistake by air traffic control.
Potentially a mistake by multiple parties. Gotta think this is the helicopters fault in the air, a lot easier to maneuver a helicopter than a passenger jet.
 
Curious why in the world they would let a helicopter take off in "direct landing lanes" from the tower.

Also curious if the plane itself has any "warning lights" going off that there is a helicopter in front of you.

Seems like a massive mistake and I suspect this is going to point to tragic mistake by air traffic control.
Well our President wasted no time in blaming Biden and Obama and DEI hiring for this tragedy. While they were/are still fishing bodies out of the water. And of course, Vance and Hegseth chimed in with the same.

 
Well our President wasted no time in blaming Biden and Obama and DEI hiring for this tragedy. While they were/are still fishing bodies out of the water. And of course, Vance and Hegseth chimed in with the same.

Well Forrest Trump will fix this too.
 
Curious why in the world they would let a helicopter take off in "direct landing lanes" from the tower.

Also curious if the plane itself has any "warning lights" going off that there is a helicopter in front of you.

Seems like a massive mistake and I suspect this is going to point to tragic mistake by air traffic control.
I really like to watch the show called "Air Disasters", where they follow/re-enact the causes of plane crashes. Very interesting, and amazing how sometimes they are able to sift through all the wreckage and use cockpit voice recorder and flight data recorder, medical and training records, weather data, etc to determine the causes. Often rather than being one single thing it is instead a series of events that combine to bring the plane down. I think it is on the National Geographic channel if you want to catch the re-runs.

I saw a graphic overlay onto like Google Earth showing the flight path of both aircraft. The chopper appeared to have been on a path following the river, it doesn't appear that it had just "taken off" right in the landing path.
There is no indication I have seen or heard of at this time that there was any kind of malfunction aboard the craft that would cause the crash.

Thoughts of possible factors:
  • Chopper flying at unusual height for the area (under 100' was stated as normal for the area)
  • Chopper pilots possibly using night vision goggles which can be problematic in urban areas
  • Chopper pilots looking at wrong plane after being told to avoid air traffic
  • Air Traffic Control not noticing chopper at wrong height
  • ATC not giving specific instruction to chopper about traffic location ("Incoming traffic at your 10:00")
  • Late change of runway from ATC
  • Late runway change may have caused plane to bank and be less visible to chopper
  • Allowing air traffic to cross landing and takeoff traffic too close to the airport
  • Too much traffic at the airport, creating overload on ATC
  • Something else entirely
I hope this is one where they can quickly identify any and all factors and take immediate steps to eliminate all factors. Such a tragedy, should never have happened.
 
Not so sure this looks like an ATC problem anymore. I just read a transcript of their traffic, and they confirmed with the helicopter that they could see the plane, then told them to maintain visual contact and fly behind it. I'm thinking that "maintain visual contact" part got missed.

Hard to imagine that a passenger plane at this altitude on approach to land was going to have made sudden moves, and it's certainly on a predictable path. Seems like it's incumbent on the helicopter at that point to stay out of the way.

Doesn't seem likely that the black boxes on the plane are likely to be much help. Maybe there will be some sort of comment on the cockpit voice recorder, but the flight data is just going to confirm that the plane's systems suddenly went batshit. I don't know if there are data recorders on a military helicopter, and if not...it might be that we never really get an explanation.
 
Not so sure this looks like an ATC problem anymore. I just read a transcript of their traffic, and they confirmed with the helicopter that they could see the plane, then told them to maintain visual contact and fly behind it. I'm thinking that "maintain visual contact" part got missed.

Hard to imagine that a passenger plane at this altitude on approach to land was going to have made sudden moves, and it's certainly on a predictable path. Seems like it's incumbent on the helicopter at that point to stay out of the way.

Doesn't seem likely that the black boxes on the plane are likely to be much help. Maybe there will be some sort of comment on the cockpit voice recorder, but the flight data is just going to confirm that the plane's systems suddenly went batshit. I don't know if there are data recorders on a military helicopter, and if not...it might be that we never really get an explanation.
There was another plane in the air at that time. The helo may have identified a plane other than the one they collided with. With the reports of the chopper crew wearing NVG's, I think they would restrict vision a fair amount, giving some tunnel vision. Not saying that is the primary cause, way to early for conclusions, just saying that it may have been a contributing factor.
 
There was another plane in the air at that time. The helo may have identified a plane other than the one they collided with. With the reports of the chopper crew wearing NVG's, I think they would restrict vision a fair amount, giving some tunnel vision. Not saying that is the primary cause, way to early for conclusions, just saying that it may have been a contributing factor.
That's exactly what I heard was the going conclusion given the current known information today. The helicopter identified a plane via their lights, but it was the wrong plane. The night goggles likely playing a role. I'm assuming the only instruments the helicopter was using for the exercise were the night goggles?

This was predicted at Reagan, avoidable, and a tragic shame.
 
There was another plane in the air at that time. The helo may have identified a plane other than the one they collided with. With the reports of the chopper crew wearing NVG's, I think they would restrict vision a fair amount, giving some tunnel vision. Not saying that is the primary cause, way to early for conclusions, just saying that it may have been a contributing factor.
Link below showing the flight paths of the aircraft. Lots of WTF's. At one point the aircraft were headed right at each other, the plane turns toward the runway, and the Blackhawk turns right into the plane's new path. WTH was the Blackhawk doing anywhere near a busy international airport in the first place? And then to turn towards the landing approach of the airport?

 
imagine if you had family on that flight and our loser Presidente diminished your loss by politicizing it to appeal to his base of wackos.
I think even our Trump-loving friend Stretch will agree that for that POS to jump on the "air" waves and post that shit is just F-ing disgraceful. Too bad it wasn't Marine One. I mean how can any decent human being, as bodies are being fished out of the water, come out and blame the hiring practices of a President 8 years out of office? As the evidence increasingly suggests it was the Blackhawk's fault. So who's next to blame? Mark Milley?

And I don't typically reply to 5591, but in this case, F-you asshole. What a POS you must be in real life.
 
I think even our Trump-loving friend Stretch will agree that for that POS to jump on the "air" waves and post that shit is just F-ing disgraceful. Too bad it wasn't Marine One. I mean how can any decent human being, as bodies are being fished out of the water, come out and blame the hiring practices of a President 8 years out of office? As the evidence increasingly suggests it was the Blackhawk's fault. So who's next to blame? Mark Milley?

And I don't typically reply to 5591, but in this case, F-you asshole. What a POS you must be in real life.
You wanna bet? Stretch, Uber, Gibbons, and the gang coming in hot with Hunter controlling ATC from his laptop.
 
That's exactly what I heard was the going conclusion given the current known information today. The helicopter identified a plane via their lights, but it was the wrong plane. The night goggles likely playing a role. I'm assuming the only instruments the helicopter was using for the exercise were the night goggles?

This was predicted at Reagan, avoidable, and a tragic shame.
There was an article by John Solomon posted on RCP today about a 2023 (?) study on the marked increase of near misses. So, yeah-predicted and unable to avoid an incident like this from eventually happening. We can only put off the odds for so long. Let's hope it is a long, long time before we have another one of these crashes.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cougini5591
You wanna bet? Stretch, Uber, Gibbons, and the gang coming in hot with Hunter controlling ATC from his laptop.
Of course it is Hunter Biden. Heck he was making 50k at Barisma, which is 1/5 the daily interest on Jared's 2 billion dollar fund....but yeah it is Hunter's fault. Probably did coke with the pilot before they went up.
 
Clearly the army helicopter was the one who made the mistake. My point it seems like some sort of a "no fly zone" by the army helicopter would make sense. You don't see helicopters hoovering around Burien where the planes are landing. This seems so avoidable and is truly tragic. No reason it should have happened.
 
You wanna bet? Stretch, Uber, Gibbons, and the gang coming in hot with Hunter controlling ATC from his laptop.
Nah. I'm sure that laptop has been all gummed up with cocaine, lube, bodily fluids and the Big Guy's prune juice for many years. You could ask the 51 former intelligence officials that signed that letter to confirm though.
 
Clearly the army helicopter was the one who made the mistake. My point it seems like some sort of a "no fly zone" by the army helicopter would make sense. You don't see helicopters hoovering around Burien where the planes are landing. This seems so avoidable and is truly tragic. No reason it should have happened.
SeaTac isn't right by the White House, Capitol, Pentagon, and all the other restricted airspace close to DCA. The air traffic control seems to have worked for the 23+ years after 9-11 in which a lot of airspace was shut down.

For something that catastrophic a number of things must have went bad.
 
Clearly the army helicopter was the one who made the mistake. My point it seems like some sort of a "no fly zone" by the army helicopter would make sense. You don't see helicopters hoovering around Burien where the planes are landing. This seems so avoidable and is truly tragic. No reason it should have happened.
This appears to be the case. Per NYT the helicopter crew requested and was granted “visual separation” from the incoming plane which means the helicopter crew took “responsibility for maintaining a safe distance from the jet”. A minute later the control tower asked the helicopter if they had a visual on the jet and to pass behind it. The helicopter crew responded with “aircraft is in sight”.
 
Of course it is Hunter Biden. Heck he was making 50k at Barisma, which is 1/5 the daily interest on Jared's 2 billion dollar fund....but yeah it is Hunter's fault. Probably did coke with the pilot before they went up.
Are you talking about Jared’s fund that as of September 2024 charged 112 million in fees but delivered zero profits to investors?

Hunter Biden’s laptop, Hunter Biden’s laptop, Polly want a cracker.
 
This appears to be the case. Per NYT the helicopter crew requested and was granted “visual separation” from the incoming plane which means the helicopter crew took “responsibility for maintaining a safe distance from the jet”. A minute later the control tower asked the helicopter if they had a visual on the jet and to pass behind it. The helicopter crew responded with “aircraft is in sight”.
Again, my big question is why an Army helicopter on some sort of training exercise out of Norfolk VA was anywhere near Reagan Airport? And approaching plane or not, why did they turn (apparently) right into the landing airspace?
 
Again, my big question is why an Army helicopter on some sort of training exercise out of Norfolk VA was anywhere near Reagan Airport? And approaching plane or not, why did they turn (apparently) right into the landing airspace?
Doh - just saw the earlier posts by Stretch and SaveFerris - seriously have to wonder if the helicopter crew was tracking the wrong plane as I think there was another plane in front of the one that got hit.

That said your questions frame the bigger issue. Army helicopters Operating that close to Reagan’s flight path just seems like an accident waiting to happen. Probably a very small probability enhanced by potential encounters over time and possibly overworked air-traffic controllers and human error.
 
Doh - just saw the earlier posts by Stretch and SaveFerris - seriously have to wonder if the helicopter crew was tracking the wrong plane as I think there was another plane in front of the one that got hit.

That said your questions frame the bigger issue. Army helicopters Operating that close to Reagan’s flight path just seems like an accident waiting to happen. Probably a very small probability enhanced by potential encounters over time and possibly overworked air-traffic controllers and human error.
Listened to a a former pilot Anthony Roman discuss the crash. He said he had a similar event where his plane nearly collided with a helicopter. From what he saw it was a clear night although "extremely dark". At the altitude of the crash the plane and helicopter crews would be fully focused on the landing and likely wouldn't see surrounding area. Also indicated there is normally 1 ATC for the military and 1 for the civilian flight. In this case there was 1 ATC to manage both the military and civilian flight. Having only 1 ATC is legal.

I heard another guy talk about instruments to detect aircraft in the area but at the altitude of the crash it can return a lot of false positives. Anyway, still a lot of speculation at this point.
 
Listened to a a former pilot Anthony Roman discuss the crash. He said he had a similar event where his plane nearly collided with a helicopter. From what he saw it was a clear night although "extremely dark". At the altitude of the crash the plane and helicopter crews would be fully focused on the landing and likely wouldn't see surrounding area. Also indicated there is normally 1 ATC for the military and 1 for the civilian flight. In this case there was 1 ATC to manage both the military and civilian flight. Having only 1 ATC is legal.

I heard another guy talk about instruments to detect aircraft in the area but at the altitude of the crash it can return a lot of false positives. Anyway, still a lot of speculation at this point.
And now we learn that a Republic Airways flight had to abort its landing at Reagan due to a helicopter. Happened just 24 hours before this collision.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT