ADVERTISEMENT

Paaan-a-ma

Did you confuse me with someone else? Did you think I was somehow promoting that? Because I wasn't/am not.

There would need to be an obvious and overwhelming reason to think of using military force for a reason like that (retaking control of the canal), and I don't see that here. What I do see is several things being thrown out for effect and negotiating stances. Panama, Mexico, Canada, Greenland, tariffs, etc. Let's just hang tight for a while and see where it all goes before getting prematurely ejaculated over them.

That last bit was thrown in just for Loyal's benefit. LOL
Well you did respond to a topic all about the Panama canal (and our perceived undersized influence vs China and the proposed changes to that system by this current president) with a lazy "TDS" dismissal. I just wanted to clarify what your position was. Taihtsat
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT