ADVERTISEMENT

The new super league, Disney is planning it already

roses04

Hall Of Fame
Oct 4, 2003
1,581
1,424
113
Not sure why they call it the Rudy League, the Mustang League, after SMU, makes more sense than naming after a walk on. The only question remaining is who gets invited to the party, we already know of about 40-50 teams.

70 team super league per SI
 
Not sure why they call it the Rudy League, the Mustang League, after SMU, makes more sense than naming after a walk on. The only question remaining is who gets invited to the party, we already know of about 40-50 teams.

70 team super league per SI
I read a version of this sometime last week. In that one, it said that the 70 teams would actually be more like a group of 40 and a group of 30 (top 16, next 24, next 30). The relegation model was that the lower 30 could move into the middle 24, and the middle 24 could move into the lower 30...but that the top 16 are the top 16 and they don't change. The conference structure would be nominally maintained for scheduling and CFP seeding, but would not be relevant to the 16/24/30 tiers.
 
Not sure why they call it the Rudy League, the Mustang League, after SMU, makes more sense than naming after a walk on. The only question remaining is who gets invited to the party, we already know of about 40-50 teams.

70 team super league per SI
At what point does the NCAA recuse themselves from being the/ a governing body over something which they exert no power or authority?
 
I read a version of this sometime last week. In that one, it said that the 70 teams would actually be more like a group of 40 and a group of 30 (top 16, next 24, next 30). The relegation model was that the lower 30 could move into the middle 24, and the middle 24 could move into the lower 30...but that the top 16 are the top 16 and they don't change. The conference structure would be nominally maintained for scheduling and CFP seeding, but would not be relevant to the 16/24/30 tiers.
fck man, I didn't think it could get worse that "70 team super league" until you laid that structure out.

Seriously, time to take our ball and go home.
 
fck man, I didn't think it could get worse that "70 team super league" until you laid that structure out.

Seriously, time to take our ball and go home.
What I just don't get is WTF do the big conferences (SEC and B1G) want? They already have shit tons more money than anyone else. What is still broken? Do the SEC teams really want to forego their annual OOC schedules of cupcakes? We haven't even gotten to our first season of the expanded playoffs and these F-ers are already plotting the demise of the FBS as we know it? Sickening.
 
fck man, I didn't think it could get worse that "70 team super league" until you laid that structure out.

Seriously, time to take our ball and go home.
Yeah, the article was pretty cynical about it. After laying out the structure, it said something like "Clearly, nobody is going to go along with this. Except...everybody will. Because if they fight it, the top 16 programs will grab another 8 and keep all of the money for themselves."
 
  • Like
Reactions: BleedCrimsonandGray
What I just don't get is WTF do the big conferences (SEC and B1G) want? They already have shit tons more money than anyone else. What is still broken? Do the SEC teams really want to forego their annual OOC schedules of cupcakes? We haven't even gotten to our first season of the expanded playoffs and these F-ers are already plotting the demise of the FBS as we know it? Sickening.
You really don't get it? They're burying the competition even further. Making certain that their new tier in college football will be filled with future NFL draft picks and have boatloads of money to fund it. More money means a guy like Ashton Jeanty at BSU does not exist in the future, and when the SEC or B1G meets some piddly school in the CFP it's a blowout.
 
  • Like
Reactions: COCoug
At what point does the NCAA recuse themselves from being the/ a governing body over something which they exert no power or authority?
People bitched for years about the ncaa and its rules. Now that they have been sued into irrelevance we are seeing the results. It will only get worse
 
Stuff like this makes me think that focusing on basketball may be a wise path to take for the "new PAC". We don't have deep enough pockets to be a long term player among the elite now that money dictates level of success. A lot of schools are going to go broke trying to be one of the chosen few.
 
Stuff like this makes me think that focusing on basketball may be a wise path to take for the "new PAC". We don't have deep enough pockets to be a long term player among the elite now that money dictates level of success. A lot of schools are going to go broke trying to be one of the chosen few.
Kinda agree, but the schools with high end FB money will also have high end BK money.
 
People bitched for years about the ncaa and its rules. Now that they have been sued into irrelevance we are seeing the results. It will only get worse
They only bitched because the rules were applied arbitrarily.

Like giving USC and Bush all their stuff back because their cheating was in arrears. (Does that make sense? Was struggling with how to word that.)
 
You really don't get it? They're burying the competition even further. Making certain that their new tier in college football will be filled with future NFL draft picks and have boatloads of money to fund it. More money means a guy like Ashton Jeanty at BSU does not exist in the future, and when the SEC or B1G meets some piddly school in the CFP it's a blowout.
Oh no stalker - uh I mean Gibby - my feeble brain just doesn't get it. Seems to me that the current upper tier is already filled with NFL draft picks, which means exactly what other than that they are the already the cream of the college crop? Is there some kickback to schools that have high draft picks from the NFL that I am unaware of?

And it seems clear, to quote the article below, that there would be no "piddly" teams in the CFP equation. But if I'm incorrect on this, yes I'm sure that the primary reason for this proposal is to assure blowouts against the one or possibly two piddly schools that make the playoffs.

"Their proposal calls for eliminating games against smaller schools and focusing exclusively on high-profile matchups while expanding the postseason."
 
Oh no stalker - uh I mean Gibby - my feeble brain just doesn't get it. Seems to me that the current upper tier is already filled with NFL draft picks, which means exactly what other than that they are the already the cream of the college crop? Is there some kickback to schools that have high draft picks from the NFL that I am unaware of?

And it seems clear, to quote the article below, that there would be no "piddly" teams in the CFP equation. But if I'm incorrect on this, yes I'm sure that the primary reason for this proposal is to assure blowouts against the one or possibly two piddly schools that make the playoffs.

"Their proposal calls for eliminating games against smaller schools and focusing exclusively on high-profile matchups while expanding the postseason."
Indeed you are feeble minded.
 
What I just don't get is WTF do the big conferences (SEC and B1G) want? They already have shit tons more money than anyone else. What is still broken? Do the SEC teams really want to forego their annual OOC schedules of cupcakes? We haven't even gotten to our first season of the expanded playoffs and these F-ers are already plotting the demise of the FBS as we know it? Sickening.
It is the continuation of decades of the top 30 (or so) schools increasing their already huge advantage over the remaining 100 or so. It was never fair, but every new rule change tilts the field even further. In my mind it is groups of utterly obsessed alumni and boosters that are completely willing to destroy the fabric of college football to give their team a greater advantage. Obviously this aligns completely with the wishes of the networks, who want a Saturday version of the NFL. The administrators are really not powerful enough to stop it, even if they wanted to. Honestly, it is probably for the best and will help clarify the future of the sport for schools like WSU, the Mountain West, and virtually every school in the North East and Mid Atlantic Region. With high school football dying a rapid death, its time to move on. We use to have a boxing team and a wrestling team, but now we don't. We might be able to compete at a D2 or D3 level in football, or not even worry about it. We won't have a D1 football team in Pullman, the same way we don't have an NFL team in Pullman.
 
We won't have a D1 football team in Pullman, the same way we don't have an NFL team in Pullman.
Considering what CFB has turned into and the direction it’s heading, I think a growing number of people at a growing number of schools would be ok with not having a team at their school.
 
It’s not the size of the category, it’s the motion of the storm surge (spoken like a true category 2).
There’s no reason to laugh at category 2. If it hits the right place, it can still cause real damage and severe localized flooding.
 
Considering what CFB has turned into and the direction it’s heading, I think a growing number of people at a growing number of schools would be ok with not having a team at their school.
Out West maybe. That’s not the case for 2/3 of the Nation.
 
Out West maybe. That’s not the case for 2/3 of the Nation.
Far more than 2/3 of the nation are pretty much out of playoff contention, ever. There is nothing in the Northeast where actually most of the population is located. Nothing in the Mountain West. I'm not convinced it will survive in the West Coast. I think it would be hard to come up with more than 10 states with a team that has a real shot year in and year out. Really, the midwest is just Ohio state, Michigan and Notre Dame. I would say 4/5 of the nation is on the sidelines, whether they realize it or not.
 
Latest news from the B1G and SEC. This actually sounds kind of promising, for now.

"... The notion that college football is broken -- what we do is broken -- is just not right.
Sankey and Petitti agreed they both want to see the 12-team CFP field unfold before they make any determinations about what could change when the next contract begins in 2026."


 
Latest news from the B1G and SEC. This actually sounds kind of promising, for now.

"... The notion that college football is broken -- what we do is broken -- is just not right.
Sankey and Petitti agreed they both want to see the 12-team CFP field unfold before they make any determinations about what could change when the next contract begins in 2026."


Omfg, they have lawyers to prevent collusion? Really? Like everything they've done for the past two years isn't colluding? Explain to me exactly how consolidating all the money and power to the only two players in the room isn't colluding?

This is the definition of "don't piss on my head and tell me its raining."
 
Omfg, they have lawyers to prevent collusion? Really? Like everything they've done for the past two years isn't colluding? Explain to me exactly how consolidating all the money and power to the only two players in the room isn't colluding?

This is the definition of "don't piss on my head and tell me its raining."
Well read what you want into it. I read it as kind of a "F-off ex-Disney execs", everything is fine for now. Which it isn't, but at least they want to let things play out for a while before sticking the pitchfork in further.
 
Well read what you want into it. I read it as kind of a "F-off ex-Disney execs", everything is fine for now. Which it isn't, but at least they want to let things play out for a while before sticking the pitchfork in further.
smoke and mirrors.

It'll be ok to take private money in 6 months when the spotlight isn't on them and suddenly its their idea.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT