I'm not triggered. That's you attempting to dodge. So, what's your answer?
I don't have a boss. And I might be the only one that can type.
Too Many Lateral Passes
- Thread starter spongeandshoot
- Start date
I don't have a boss. And I might be the only one that can type.
You absolutely were triggered...just like you were every time I criticized Leach on refusing to run the ball when teams dropped 8 in coverage or had a light box.
You aren't as clever as you think you are. ..so try not to pat yourself on the back too much.
Do you need a time limit? Three words is all you need to answer the question. I don't want to overtax your intellect.
If you need the answer that bad, go back and read Swing Your Sword...or get your hands on the Tony Franklin system. You can probably find his manual on ebay for cheap .
And Leach refusing to run the ball when the defenses dropped 8 and made us fit it into tight windows with no opportunity for yac violates the core principle that you want to know so badly
I'm asking for your answer. Do you have one? thirty minutes left. Might want to stop dodging.
Not playing your middle school games dblithers... especially on your client's nickel.
You still haven't answered my first question on why you are so triggered by my post
I already told you I'm not triggered. You lack the ability to read my mind, and are obviously still dodging.
Time is up. The only three words you needed were "attack open space." You couldn't even manage that. So, no you don't understand the offense. You've proven it here. Enjoy Costa Rica.
The uw and their 4 star qbs is at least a tie.
Time is up? Did you emotional support monkey with an abacus tell you that
Actually it"s attack open space with skilled position players.
You're welcome.
Yes, Chip. Just my humble opinion, but I think that over the past 3 decades, UCLA has by far done less with more than any other PAC team. I'd put Oregon second, USC third, UW 4th, Arizona 5th and ASU 6th. On the flip side, I'd say WSU has done more with less, followed closely by Utah. After Utah, there is a gap, but OSU is next. Cal and Stanford both inhabit their own worlds (for somewhat different reasons) and I frankly have a hard time comparing their situation to the rest of us. Colorado seems to do less with less, and I'm not sure how to rank that, either.
CU should be enormously better than they are. I dunno how much local talent they have but I’d wager it’s similar to WA and OR. They could recruit CA, TX and maybe even Chicago. I dunno what is going on there.
Good programs can exist anywhere, and Boulder's not a bad college town. But - and I live here - it's Berkeley-tier granola, and the academic focuses aren't necessarily blue-collar-football-friendly like WSU (ag, vet, eg), so the type of student they're getting is just not one that grew up playing or has a big interest.
They had some good teams in the 1990s, and I know some younger Buffs football fans at work, but the demo skew of the CU fan is getting pretty old, and is being replaced by upper-income out-of-state hippie granola kids who care nothing for football.
They have a beautiful stadium in Folsom backed up to the mountains - not unlike Air Force or Utah - but IMO that program's fortunes could be in jeopardy if they don't find a way to make some noise in the next decade or two. The fan is getting to be Cal or Stanford tier.
So it’s a trust fund kid school of North easterners that come for the weed and skiing. Got it.
If only they had a large metropolitan base to pull from. Or a second one just 60 miles south. Or everything inbetween.
CU does a shitty job of marketing themselves to the locals, they might actually be worse than WSU.
