Idaho St, altho not good, great, is a better Idaho St, perhaps the best Idaho St ever, and is at least a ok, semi good Idaho St.
Idaho St had a player score 41, FORTY ONE points against AIR FORCE, and AIRFORCE is USUALLY a GOOD Mountain West team.
And WSU held the player that scored 41 points to 2 buckets, and a very small semi handful of points.
If this has not been a better, best Idaho St, and had been a CRAPPY Idaho St, like in years past, then WSU would have won by a way bigger margin say 17 to 33 points.
A 11 point margin of victory against a better Idaho State, that better then past Idaho St's, is better then a bigger margin of victory against a Crappy Idaho St in the past.
This team will likely win 12,13,14,15,16 this season.
This team will also be close in a lot of HARD FOUGHT games.
And this team is playing, will play better basketball then Kents team.
Kent's team beat a Crap Idaho St by a bigger margin, and then had a HORRIBLE srason of HORRIBLE basketball.
Smith had a smaller margin of victory against a better, semi good non crap Idaho St, and has played better Basketball, and will have, play a better season.
Posting that Kent had bigger margin of victory against a CRAP Idaho St, was, is SILLY.
Also Smith beat Seattlle Pacific, by 31 points, the same team that BEAT Kent
So the Kent had a bigger victory comment ignores that, which another reason why the comment Silly.
And if your going to do a comparison, there needs to be CONTEXT, which there was none. Another reason why the post was, is silly.
Now if Smith can get players to SHOOT better....
A lot of things like hustle, rebounding, defense, limiting turnovers, forcing turnovers, etc, are good and keeping them in games, winning them games.
Just need to shoot better.