I love Smith's recruiting. He and his staff work so hard and have great connections, especially with the international scene. Certainly the best recruiter WSU has had in decades. Is he better than what George Raveling was able to do? It's a matter of opinion. I was a student back in George's day and he had several great recruiting classes. You mentioned House, but Puidokas, Collins, Giovacchini, Barnhill, Greg Johnson, Terry Kelly, Guy Williams, Steve Harriel, Bryan Rison, (and I'm missing a few) were all comparable to the players Smith is bringing in. Rav did have a few clunker classes and I would have to say that Kyle Smith really hasn't had a subpar class yet. (I don't really count his first class in which he had a short period of time to cobble together recruits). Pretty exciting for the future of Cougar basketball.
Glad Cougar
I'll even help you by adding Craig Ehlo.
All those guys were great, awesome.
But only House, Guy Williams, Puidokas, Craig Ehlo, are, were either better then or Equal to
Gueye(4, 4.5 stars), Jackson 4 stars, Jaki( 4 stars ) Diongue(4,4.5 stars), Efe(3,3.5 stars), Noah Williams(3.5, 4 stars) Carlos Rosario(4 stars), Bamba(3, 3.5 stars), Koulibaly(3, 3.5, 4 stars)
Gueye was projected as a Lottery pick by experts before he even committed.
Jaki TURNED DOWN a PRO, PROFESSIONAL CONTRACT, MONEY to play at WSU.
Efe, before his injury, was on the OFFICIAL NBA SITE, showing off his JORDAN DUNK, coached by a NBA coach, was on FASTRACK to NBA G LEAGUE, before his injury hit him.
Koulibaly was reportedly a projected 1 and done to NBA.
I know that they didn't have star rankings back then. But if they had had star rankings back then, Smith's average star rankings is about 3.75 stars, and Raveling's, would have been about 2.5 to 3 to 3.25 star.
Remember you can't go by just House, Guy, Puidokas, Ehlo, and their college, NBA careers. You have to go by their RECRUIT RANKINGS at the time they were recruited.
And you have to include the CLUNKER classes.
It took Raveling 7, SEVEN years to semi consistently recruit good, get WSU to the NCAA tournament.
On that Journey, Raveling had some real STINKER classes, players.
Smith on the other hand, has done better EARLIER, has been more CONSISTENT, and only had 1 semi clunker class, because as you said, Smith barely had any time at all to put together a class at all.
OVERALL RECRUIT RANKINGS, ON PAPER, ETC, Smith has been the better recruiter. His recruits overall have been higher ranked, and higher on paper, and he has beat out more Duke's, Kentucky's, North Carolina's, Kansas's, etc, for higher rates recruits then Raveling has.
And even if Raveling were to have been better recruiting wise(He wasn't better), he had 7 years to Smith's about 3,4 years.
By the time Smith reaches 7+ years, his results recruiting wise will be better then Raveling(Smith's recruiting results are already better then Raveling's Recruiting Results.)
Arguably Smith is the best recruiter in WSU history.