WBB vs NAU

[Rich Lewis]

Was a hard game to watch. Terrible shooting. Don't know what the final percentages were but had to be in the 20's from 3 and 30's overall. Has to improve. Fortunately they played well otherwise. Forced a ton of turnovers and rebounded well. Only played 8 and only 3 points from the bench. Lot of minutes for the starters except Bella who got in foul trouble. Wallack is big and strong. Looks bigger than Bella or Nankervis but plays G/F.

 

[kougkurt]

Was a hard game to watch. Terrible shooting. Don't know what the final percentages were but had to be in the 20's from 3 and 30's overall. Has to improve. Fortunately they played well otherwise. Forced a ton of turnovers and rebounded well. Only played 8 and only 3 points from the bench. Lot of minutes for the starters except Bella who got in foul trouble. Wallack is big and strong. Looks bigger than Bella or Nankervis but plays G/F.

Good recap. Nothing was falling til the very end. Wallack does seem like the real deal. Stars seem a bit bigger and slower.

 

[SaveFerris]

I thought NAU was solid. Pretty good fundamentals and shooting. We couldn't get shots to fall. Some really off but a lot of rim outs as well.

Really impressed with Wallack for a true frosh. She seems to have a good understanding of the game and makes good decisions. I do feel like we might be missing Teder on both ends. She helped ball movement and is a good perimeter defender. It's good getting Wallack minutes at this point though.

I agree with kougkurt. We seemed slower. Last year our quickness on both ends was a strength. Hoping it's somewhat the level of competition but they are going to need to dial it up as the schedule gets tougher.