ADVERTISEMENT

What will Washington State bring to the Big 12?

I love this guy’s podcast and how high on the Cougs he is. Hope he knows what he’s talking about…..
He sounds pretty damn confident doesn’t he?! So he’s with ESPN radio?

No argument can be made to the contrary about WSU viewership. He laid out what a no-brainer this is for the conference.
 
I love this guy’s podcast and how high on the Cougs he is. Hope he knows what he’s talking about…..
Everything he's says is accurate. All this stuff helps. Dickert and Corso. This guy. All the noise. All positive for us.

Let's hope President Shultz and Chun are plugged in, on the same bus, the same boat and mindset, where G5 isn't an option. Hopefully they're plugged into all of this noise.
 
Last edited:
It’s all about geography. Sure, OSU and WSU can compete in sports but if there’s no extra cash for the conference members, they don’t want to hassle traveling to the PNW, especially for Olympic sports.
 
It’s all about geography. Sure, OSU and WSU can compete in sports but if there’s no extra cash for the conference members, they don’t want to hassle traveling to the PNW, especially for Olympic sports.
They would each bring in the same media market to the Big12 that uw and ou will bring to the B1G. I do not understand why the media broadcast partner of the Big12 doesn't see the benefits of this. That's all I have to say about that.
 
They would each bring in the same media market to the Big12 that uw and ou will bring to the B1G. I do not understand why the media broadcast partner of the Big12 doesn't see the benefits of this. That's all I have to say about that.
The networks don't see it because we're not located in the market we bring. USC brings LA, UW brings Seattle. We bring a dispersed market that's not directly tied to a specific geography, and they're not sure how to deal with that. They see our home market as Spokane/E WA, and don't see enough there to be worth pursuing. They also can't quantify the market growth potential, so they assume we don't have any.
 
The networks don't see it because we're not located in the market we bring. USC brings LA, UW brings Seattle. We bring a dispersed market that's not directly tied to a specific geography, and they're not sure how to deal with that. They see our home market as Spokane/E WA, and don't see enough there to be worth pursuing. They also can't quantify the market growth potential, so they assume we don't have any.
That’s just being lazy and probably realistic for the first cut of this process. The more our admin and coaches keep banging the actual viewership data numbers it forces a closer look at where the viewers/ markets are.
 
The networks don't see it because we're not located in the market we bring. USC brings LA, UW brings Seattle. We bring a dispersed market that's not directly tied to a specific geography, and they're not sure how to deal with that. They see our home market as Spokane/E WA, and don't see enough there to be worth pursuing. They also can't quantify the market growth potential, so they assume we don't have any.

Mostly right, except that WSU delivers a SEATTLE MARKET. That's not a dispersed market, and is a specific geography.

That said, even though that's a specific Geography, not a dispersed market, etc, your right that the media does not see, perceive that, and wrongly thinks that the market is only Spokane, E WA, and wrongly thinks WSU has no market growth potential, because they are MEDIA IDIOTS, INCAPABLE of seeing facts, doing market research, etc, and make ASSES out of themselves, and others by making WRONG ASS UMPTIONS.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT