After being repeatedly shown that no one was ever sprayed with a hose in freezing temperatures, you continued to perpetuate that lie. You know it. I know it. Everyone on this board for the Marquess Wilson saga knows it. So, you got another lie right here.
You are so full of crap. First you said there weren't temperatures that low so it could not have happened. I show you that there were. Then you want other documentation.
I have not once SAID it did happen. What I have been very careful to say, and put this on your forehead, is that one party said it happened. Is that not true? One party said it did not happen. Is that not true. Did Moos say they stopped using water in the pit? That too is true. There is not one thing that I have not said that isn't true.
I said this is a he said he said case. Period. I didn't perpetuate jack. You brought it up seven years later.
But since you did, I will reiterate my stance. A player said they used water in the pit in freezing temps. You said that was impossible because of dates. I simply point out two dates in September that it was sub 32 in the morning, which happens tpo be the time of day the parent alleged it happened.
All I have ever said for me that they needed to talk to Drake and ask him about the letter he felt compelled to write, and not talking to him raises questions for me that could have been easily answered.
I would take it that you are very skilled at your job. Let's play a little plaintiff/defendant. Say you represented the plaintiff and they accused the S and C coach (NOT LEACH) of using water in sub freezing temperatures. You interview players and find out nothing, that the school's claims that nothing happened because the players didn't witness it. Do you walk away ?
If you found out there was communication between Drake and Moos, and in that communication you discovered Drake was concerned about the S and C, and some of the things he was doing that could be harmful, do you still walk away? You don't ask Drake what his concern was?
