Laetner was second team all American coming out of high school and one of the most sought after recruits in the nation. 4 final fours in college plus 2 national championships, national college player of the year. 11 years in the NBA, first team all rookie team and 1 year as an all star. I really wish we had someone even close to him but we don’t.
Bobby Hurley (not in the same class) was first team parade all American, point guard on the tournament of champions winner which crowned the supposed high school national champion and was MVP of the McDonald’s all American game. Again I really really wish we had a player of this caliber but we don’t.
You do realize, that back then, BBall is not like today. The reason why Laetner, and Hurly got all those accolades in high school:
1. They were probably in ELITE AAU EQUIVALENT BBALL CLUBS their whole lives, by their RICH parents.
2. Bball competition back then was such, that there were fewer good players to have to beat out.
In addition to point 1 above, that is another reason why.Laetner and Hurly had so many highschool accolades, awards, rankings, etc.
If Laetner, Hurly had played in today's highschool, AAU ball, they wouldnt have been as highly sought after, rated, etc.
3. There were a lot of Laetners/Hurly's who were just as highly sought after, ranked, etc, who did NOT pan out.
Why? Because they didnt have Grant Hill, Coach K, Duke, etc.
Duke, Coach K, Grant Hill MADE LAETNER, HURLY.
Laetner, Hurly were kind of Like Cowgil, Chris Henry, Casey Calvary, Lodwick, etc, in that they were LESS, NOT AS ATHLETIC, and were semi slower, not as fast laterally, didnt jump as high, etc, as other players.
What they did have was:
1. They had heart, soul.
2. They worked their azzes off. LUNCH PAIL.
3. They were very CRAFTY, SKILLED, TALENTED, GOOD SHOOTERS(Laetner had BACK TO BASKET POST SKILLS, and could shoot the 3, midrange, drive,etc)
Those good qualities were HONED by their ELITE RICH Club, highschool coaches, and by Coach K of Duke.
They were also EXTREMELY SMART, MADE EXTREMELY GOOD DECISION both with and without the ball in Bball, and off the court, in academics, and life(Part of the Reason those 2 DUKIE RICH BOYS went to Duke.
Make no mistake, if Laetner hadnt played back then, in RICH ELITE CLUBS, PRIVATE BBALL HIGHSCHOOLS, ETC. And if Laetner and Hurly hadnt gone to Duke, and not been coached by Coach K, they would not have ENDED UP AS GOOD.
Thats why I say that if take any 3.5 star, 4 star, 4.5 star, EXTREMELY NBA ESQUE FREAKISHLY ATHLETIC, and had them play Laetner or Hurly as High school Grad vs Highschool Grad, ONE ON ONE, WITHOUT the coaches, coach K, without Duke, etc, they woukd have OWNED, DESTROYED LAETNER, HURLY.
Also there was a reason why almost all the NBA PG, SG, etc, owned, outplayed Hurly, when Hurly made the NBA.
And the reason why, is that Hurly didnt have good athleticism, to go with his skills that he got from his club coaches, highschool coaches, and from Coach K.
If Cowgil, Henry, Lodwick, Witherill, etc, had played for the clubs that Laetner, Hurly had played on, and had played for the highschools that Laetner and Hurly had played for, and had played on Duke, with Grant Hill, and been coached by Coach K, then they would have probably been almost as good as Laetner, Hurly, ended up being.
If Hurly hadnt played for Duke, Benny Seltzer would have had Hurly for breakfast, owned, destroyed, schooled him, Hurly.
Hurly was definitely OVERRATED, and had a lot of help(Club, Highschool Coaches, Duke, Grant Hill, Coach K)