Confirmation

[Flatlandcoug]

View embedded media

What's fuggin' fantastic is that your idiotic response highlights the accuracy of my prior comments. Trump is 100% politically motivated in his pursuit of finding out what is on Hunter's laptop. I think Hunter Biden is a greaseball and it is possible that he should be in jail. Where you prove your hypocrisy is that you feel that it is impossible for Biden's son to have business in Ukraine that wasn't corrupt....but when Donald Trump's son-in-law gets $2 billion from the Saudis, you just ignore it and pretend that it was good business practices that got him the money. Again....you and yours are just a bunch of hypocrites.

 

[UberCougars]

I posted Loomer links just to piss you off. I realized you weren’t interested in the subject she was referencing but you were blinded by the source. LOL 😎

 

[UberCougars]

What's fuggin' fantastic is that your idiotic response highlights the accuracy of my prior comments. Trump is 100% politically motivated in his pursuit of finding out what is on Hunter's laptop. I think Hunter Biden is a greaseball and it is possible that he should be in jail. Where you prove your hypocrisy is that you feel that it is impossible for Biden's son to have business in Ukraine that wasn't corrupt....but when Donald Trump's son-in-law gets $2 billion from the Saudis, you just ignore it and pretend that it was good business practices that got him the money. Again....you and yours are just a bunch of hypocrites.

I honestly gave you credit for being smarter than this.

Sorry, my mistake!

 

[Coug90]

I posted Loomer links just to piss you off. I realized you weren’t interested in the subject she was referencing but you were blinded by the source. LOL 😎

Neat. Did you ask Grok about it? Guessing not…or you did and didn’t like the answer.

 

[UberCougars]

 

[roses04]

As to his wealth, he would have been able to afford plenty of Big Macs continuing to license his name and the beauty pageant stuff was doing well before the apprentice. His holdings after his face plant in Atlantic City still would have made him a billionaire. Net worth may not have been above a billion absent the Apprentice.

President, again, is because of people like you.

He's President again because the Dems put up Kamala, who accomplished very little and is an Idiot, and a failed candidate from the start. She performed very poorly in the primaries 4 years earlier, why they thought she was a good candidate puzzles me. In the end the choice was between an Idiot and an Asshole, that ran the country for 4 years and despite everything had a good economy, and one could question how much he really had to do with that. The democrats should have kicked Joe to the curb 18 months sooner and had a real primary, had they done this we would not be looking at Trump as president today. The Democrats can bitch about Trump, but they blew it, and had every opportunity to win again, they just had a terrible game plan.

 

[Flatlandcoug]

He's President again because the Dems put up Kamala, who accomplished very little and is an Idiot, and a failed candidate from the start. She performed very poorly in the primaries 4 years earlier, why they thought she was a good candidate puzzles me. In the end the choice was between an Idiot and an Asshole, that ran the country for 4 years and despite everything had a good economy, and one could question how much he really had to do with that. The democrats should have kicked Joe to the curb 18 months sooner and had a real primary, had they done this we would not be looking at Trump as president today. The Democrats can bitch about Trump, but they blew it, and had every opportunity to win again, they just had a terrible game plan.

There is no doubt that Biden's unwillingness to accept his own decline was the downfall for the Democrats. Kamala would probably not have been the winner if the Democrats had done a legitimate primary.

The other, larger overarching problem is the fact that their most visible positions in the news in the past six months or more have been focusing on improving the situation for immigrants and transgender people. While some people may feel some sympathy for their plight, focusing on a small group of demographics and allowing the Republicans to sell that Democrats don't really care about the rest of Americans has been a huge drag. Transgender athletes in sports was the dumbest hill to die on but the Democrats were willing to do that.

 

[Stretch 74]

There is no doubt that Biden's unwillingness to accept his own decline was the downfall for the Democrats. Kamala would probably not have been the winner if the Democrats had done a legitimate primary.

The other, larger overarching problem is the fact that their most visible positions in the news in the past six months or more have been focusing on improving the situation for immigrants and transgender people. While some people may feel some sympathy for their plight, focusing on a small group of demographics and allowing the Republicans to sell that Democrats don't really care about the rest of Americans has been a huge drag. Transgender athletes in sports was the dumbest hill to die on but the Democrats were willing to do that.

I would completely agree with sentence #1. On sentence #2 I would make it stronger- It is extremely unlikely that Kamala would have won a Democrat primary, either a normal primary or some kind of compressed option put together after Joe crashed the June debate.

I have seen some speculation that Biden was so pissed off after being forced out that he came out in favor of Harris in order to screw over her for her compliance with the coup and also screw over the party in general by essentially forcing them to accept her as the nominee while knowing she was unlikely to win. If that was indeed the case I am sure that Jill and Hunter were big players in coordinating that.

IMHO, I think the biggest problem that the Democrats have now is the fact that they have lost (or purposely thrown overboard) any semblance of common sense. Was there any common sense in supporting all the BLM rioters? Or the anti Jewish/Hamas supporters occupying college campuses? Or supporting open borders? Or pushing mandates for EV's? Or allowing "sanctuary cities/counties/states". Or inventing new genders? Or pushing the lie of gender affirming care? Or allowing male bodied athletes to compete against females? Etc, etc, etc?

Many, many Americans sent out the message to the Dems of "Go sell crazy somewhere else, we're all stocked up here". I may have the quote slightly misquoted, but you can all get the picture.

 

[95coug]

I would completely agree with sentence #1. On sentence #2 I would make it stronger- It is extremely unlikely that Kamala would have won a Democrat primary, either a normal primary or some kind of compressed option put together after Joe crashed the June debate.

I have seen some speculation that Biden was so pissed off after being forced out that he came out in favor of Harris in order to screw over her for her compliance with the coup and also screw over the party in general by essentially forcing them to accept her as the nominee while knowing she was unlikely to win. If that was indeed the case I am sure that Jill and Hunter were big players in coordinating that.

IMHO, I think the biggest problem that the Democrats have now is the fact that they have lost (or purposely thrown overboard) any semblance of common sense. Was there any common sense in supporting all the BLM rioters? Or the anti Jewish/Hamas supporters occupying college campuses? Or supporting open borders? Or pushing mandates for EV's? Or allowing "sanctuary cities/counties/states". Or inventing new genders? Or pushing the lie of gender affirming care? Or allowing male bodied athletes to compete against females? Etc, etc, etc?

Many, many Americans sent out the message to the Dems of "Go sell crazy somewhere else, we're all stocked up here". I may have the quote slightly misquoted, but you can all get the picture.

My only hesitation to agreeing completely is that I'm not sure who else the Democrats could have put forward. There really isn't a "leading" Dem at this point - nobody has enough following to be a legitimate national candidate.

After Harris, they've got who? Newsome? AOC? Buttigieg? Those are the three most recognizable, but none of them are going to get elected. Whitmer and Shapiro aren't as polarizing, but they also don't have much name recognition outside of their own states.

The Republicans have a much longer list of people who are within reach - starting with Vance. He's probably not viable today, but over the next 4 years they're going to set him up as the next guy (unless he pisses off DJT...and then he'll be left to twist). They've also got DeSantis (who seems to be fading), Haley (who may have peaked), Noem, Sanders, Kemp, and probably some others that could get a lot more traction than any of the current candidates.

And, of course, that neglects the possibility that Trump gets the 22nd amendment rescinded and runs again.

 

[Loyal Coug1]

My only hesitation to agreeing completely is that I'm not sure who else the Democrats could have put forward. There really isn't a "leading" Dem at this point - nobody has enough following to be a legitimate national candidate.

After Harris, they've got who? Newsome? AOC? Buttigieg? Those are the three most recognizable, but none of them are going to get elected. Whitmer and Shapiro aren't as polarizing, but they also don't have much name recognition outside of their own states.

The Republicans have a much longer list of people who are within reach - starting with Vance. He's probably not viable today, but over the next 4 years they're going to set him up as the next guy (unless he pisses off DJT...and then he'll be left to twist). They've also got DeSantis (who seems to be fading), Haley (who may have peaked), Noem, Sanders, Kemp, and probably some others that could get a lot more traction than any of the current candidates.

And, of course, that neglects the possibility that Trump gets the 25th amendment rescinded and runs again.

My only hesitation to agreeing completely is that the post in question came from Stretch. That requires total disagreement no matter what the content is.

The pendulum has now swung all the way to the right. Dems need to sort of STFU, take their lumps (they can't do anything anyway now but whine), and wait for the various "Republican" factions to start feeding on each other. No need to think ahead 4 years. I mean who the F was Bill Clinton 4 years before he became President?

 

[95coug]

My only hesitation to agreeing completely is that the post in question came from Stretch. That requires total disagreement no matter what the content is.

The pendulum has now swung all the way to the right. Dems need to sort of STFU, take their lumps (they can't do anything anyway now but whine), and wait for the various "Republican" factions to start feeding on each other. No need to think ahead 4 years. I mean who the F was Bill Clinton 4 years before he became President?

I don’t disagree, but at this point the Republicans have mostly lined up behind Trump. There are still a few holdouts from the older version of the party, but they are aging out and becoming less relevant. I had hoped they’d consume themselves from within, maybe even break into separate parties, but that moment seems to have passed.

The democrats basically have no continuity or effective leadership, and also no real unity.

I’d like to see either or both of them line up behind a more moderate/centrist candidate, but there’s little indication that person exists, and none that they’ll get behind them.

Also wouldn’t mind seeing another party step into the void and start attracting some attention….but that’s not happening either.

At this point it appears that we’re likely to continue to see candidates get less and less compelling, less than treated in solving issues than partisan BS, and more autocratic, governing by fiat….which will be immediately reversed when the other party takes over again. If only the voting population would wise up.

 

[UberCougars]

I don’t disagree, but at this point the Republicans have mostly lined up behind Trump. There are still a few holdouts from the older version of the party, but they are aging out and becoming less relevant. I had hoped they’d consume themselves from within, maybe even break into separate parties, but that moment seems to have passed.

The democrats basically have no continuity or effective leadership, and also no real unity.

I’d like to see either or both of them line up behind a more moderate/centrist candidate, but there’s little indication that person exists, and none that they’ll get behind them.

Also wouldn’t mind seeing another party step into the void and start attracting some attention….but that’s not happening either.

At this point it appears that we’re likely to continue to see candidates get less and less compelling, less than treated in solving issues than partisan BS, and more autocratic, governing by fiat….which will be immediately reversed when the other party takes over again. If only the voting population would wise up.

It did.

 

[Cougini5591]

He's President again because the Dems put up Kamala, who accomplished very little and is an Idiot, and a failed candidate from the start. She performed very poorly in the primaries 4 years earlier, why they thought she was a good candidate puzzles me. In the end the choice was between an Idiot and an Asshole, that ran the country for 4 years and despite everything had a good economy, and one could question how much he really had to do with that. The democrats should have kicked Joe to the curb 18 months sooner and had a real primary, had they done this we would not be looking at Trump as president today. The Democrats can bitch about Trump, but they blew it, and had every opportunity to win again, they just had a terrible game plan.

He's President again because of Kamala?

Stupid statement.

Wasn't the original pick Biden?

Trump was beating him too.