Probably pointless to argue with you, but THIS is what you wrote:
"And If Bone took over with Low, Rochestie, Baynes, Cowgill instead of Hartune Witherill etc it probably would have been a different outcome."
Why would you only mention two Tony recruits that didn't work out and not the recruits that were good to excellent players? Why wouldn't you mention Klay and Casto as inherited players? Both were on the all-conference newcomer team as freshmen and both played on the USA basketball U-19 Team that included the best young college players in the nation. Bone had both players for 2 years and Tony secured another very good player in Brock Motum, who Bone had for 4 years. That's not to mention the way he treated Marcus Thames in favor of his recruit, Reggie Moore. I get tired of the revisionist history that some people spew that Tony Bennett didn't leave much for Ken Bone. Is it reasonable to expect that Tony Bennett should leave a complete team of players of the caliber of Low, Rochestie, Baynes, Cowgill to the next coach? He left plenty of good building blocks, IMO. The basketball program undeniably went downhill under Bone's watch and hasn't gotten any better under Ernie Kent.
Glad Cougar