I hope we are done talking about boycotting the Apple Cup

[KRUSTYtheCOUG]

Well, we're not scheduled to play uw at a neutral site in Seattle ever again.

So let's keep the current scheduling agreement. Money continues to flow with a better chance of a victory.

 

[KRUSTYtheCOUG]

No shit. Is the point winning or money? Continuing to play uw is a half measure as mentioned above. If the point is to win, then schedule cupcakes. If the point is money, schedule the body bags.

You miss the fact that we just did both. It isn't all or nothing. At this point we clearly don't have to choose one or the other. Taihtsat

 

[Cougini5591]

I don't understand this bickering. We just beat the bastards. We have a 4 game home and home agreement. We need that home game next year, because it will be a stretch to find 3 more home games against any FCS teams, let alone Power 4. The MW ain't gonna oblige, and our future league mates have filled schedules already. So we may be looking at 4 home games (who I don't know but they will suck), and away games at Stanford, Cal and Ole Miss. And still needing one more.

The bickering is easy.

It's called **** fuw.

See? Easy.

I'd rather play Oregon at Oregon every year than play fuw at fuw or in Seattle which is really no different than fuw.

 

[Suudy]

You missed the best Apple cup ever.

Uh, no. Tense. Fun. Interesting. But not best ever. ‘92 and ‘97 were better. ‘88 much better. ‘82 probably the best. But certainly no ‘24.

 

[Coug90]

Uh, no. Tense. Fun. Interesting. But not best ever. ‘92 and ‘97 were better. ‘88 much better. ‘82 probably the best. But certainly no ‘24.

Here’s what I will say. That was maybe the most intense Apple Cup wire to wire in at least a decade. Last years game, while close, still just seemed kinda boring. Almost like we were never going to win Because UW had been getting bailed by the refs all year. And of course most of the last decade before that were blowouts.

The game this year just teetered on every play. It was a fitting ending.