Lightning delay in Montlake

[YakiCoug]

I don’t disagree, but USCs defense is weak. They sprung their new QB on Stanford, but we’ll see how he does once his game film starts getting circulated.

Ah, yes, the dreaded playing-a-true-freshman-at-quarterback trap. Gets'em every time!

 

[CougPatrol]

Ah, yes, the dreaded playing-a-true-freshman-at-quarterback trap. Gets'em every time!

Hey, that kid is more familiar with the air raid than Daniels.

 

[metprof]

The first clap of thunder caused Margo and Biff's guest to spill merlot all over their white carpet.

 

[mikalalas]

After watching USC last night really not sure why they are in not the list of probable losses for UW. I would say they are the most probable. Match up issues across the board with UW's inability to generate a pass rush.

Also interesting fact for a supposed "elite" program like UW, they are now 3-3 in their last 6 Pac 12 north games.

Reason why USC is not a semi probable loss for UW, and only a possible loss at best, is that USC:

1. Lost QB Daniels.

2. True or RS Freshman QB, that a 4 star.

3. They were behind by about 17 to 23 points, only scored about 3 to 7 points in the 1st half, before making a semi miracle comeback to win by 20 to 23 points.

4. Stanford lost QB Costello, and should only win about 5,6,7 games, because not only lost Costello, but only 3 to 6 returning starters. But yet despite that, Stanford Dominated the 1st Half vs USC. And even tho USC dominated the 2nd half, that was only against a weaker team like Stanford.

5. Both Stanford, and USC, both are not very good. Both should only win 5,6,7 games. Both are teams that UW should probably beat. Is it POSSIBLE that Stanford wnd USC beat UW? Yes. Probable? probably not.