Almost all sides, people have both good and bad points here, and reasons, both legit, not legit for those points.
Ed, Biggs, etc:
This may sound contradictory. But this is both a complex, and simple thing.
IF all things are equal, a rush 3, drop 8 into 2 mid, and Deep Zones, defending the Middle, 5 yards per catch, etc, can, does USUALLY beat a MIKE LEACH AIR RAID.
The thing is tho, THINGS ARENT ALWAYS EQUAL.
The reason why UW, and Cal, BYU, was able to rush 3, drop 8, shut down WSU Mike Leach Air Raid, is because they HAD 3 NFL ESQUE DT's DESTROYING WSU's OL, letting them drop 8 into pass coverage.
AND Mike Leach an or the QB was not either running as QB an or not handing ball off.
While that worked against WSU, that wont work against MSU.
UW, CAL, BYU would NOT be able to rush 3, drop 8 vs MSU. MSU's OL would kill the 3 rushers, D Line, the QB would have ALL DAY TO THROW, and K Hill would either do hand offs, swing passes, screens, shovel passes, etc, and get BIG TIME YARDS vs that 3 man front.
The exception is UW 1,2 years could have shut down a MSU Mike Leach Air Raid.
Now SEC defenses are better then UW, Cal, so they might or might not be able to shut down a MSU Mike Leach Air Raid by rushing 3, dropping 8 back.
But even if they did do that, they woukdnt be successful doing that most to almost all the time.
Sometimes they would succeed, sometimes fail.
But even if it would fail, you have to at least try to rush 3, Drop 8.
If I was the DC. On 1st down I would rush 4, nickel, dime package, drop 7 back. On 2nd and mid to short, same. 2nd and long, rush 3, drop 8 back, nickel or dime package. 3rd and short, rush 4, nickel package. 3rd and long, rush 3, drop 8, dime package.
I would have a BUCK LB, that play both DL, LB, and have him try to read the offense, and have him either rush, blitz, or stop the run, or drop back into mid zone pass coverage.
Also while its easy to say rush 3, drop 8, thats harder to do without the right personel.
And the right personel to stop the Air Raid isnt always the right personel to stop everyone else.
The SEC defenses dont just have the Air Raid to stop, they have to stop everyone else.
Because of that, and Because MSU is better then WSU, has better OL, QB, RB, WR, etc, then WSU, then MSU will beat some to most SEC defenses that rush 3, drop 8.
That said, the SEC defenses should at least try to rush 3, drop 8.
Pingdude, Chip:
Sure RAC, YAC, is a BIG part of it.
But dont forget EASOP WINSTON was making lots of YAC, RAC, and had that 89 YAC, RAC, TD, made 2,3,4 Utah defenders miss.
The reason why WSU didnt have as good of RAC, YAC, was not the receivers. WSU receiving Corp was rated one of the top 5 to top 10 in entire nation pre season, and for good reason.
Reason for low RAC, YAC:
1. Gordon didnt pass left.
2. Gordon would lock onto target, not look off target, then return, throw.
3. Gordon had his favorite targets.
4. Gordon didnt do as many shovel passes, swing passes, screens, etc.
5. UW, CAL, with only 3 Rushers were able to get heat on, sack, rush Gordon
6. Because of above, Gordon often didnt hit receiver in stride.
7. Because of that Gordon left WR's open to getting immediatly hit, stopped, right after catch, for little to no YAC, AGAINST UW, CAL, BYU, etc.
MSU isnt likely to have those problems.
So yes, YAC, RAC, is a LOT of it, but there are other reasons besides YAC.
Farmer:
Even tho a lot of the points your making are good.
Your doing it in the wrong way.
I dont think, buy the BS others are saying about you.
I think you actually think Flat, others have said, and done, what you accuse them of thinking, saying; doing.
And I think you are just trying to call them out for it.
But your methodology is wrong.
Your being highly confrontational., insulting, flaming, etc.
We have enough of that here with or without you.
A lot of what you say is good.
But your methodology is bad.
Try being less arrogant. Try less flaming.
Just nicely say the good points you make, and nicely explain.