Hundreds of WSU faculty members issued a press release Wednesday morning arguing for new leadership, including a new president, administration and board of regents. The group is concerned about the 16% decrease in enrollment numbers since President Kirk Schulz took his position in 2016...
dailyevergreen.com
Yes and no.
Even tho the faculty wants changes, and even tho they are right in blaming leadership and wanting leadership change, what they are not seeing is that WSU, OSU NEEDS FOR SCHULZ, CHUN to HAVE VOTES ON THE CFP COMMITTEE, AND THE CFP SELECTION COMMITTEE.
If get rid of Schulz, Chun NOW, then WSU, OSU, PAC 2, will lose ACCESS, VOTES, REPRESENTATION on the CFP AND SELECTION COMMITTEE, which would be BAD for WSU, OSU, PAC 2.
IF Schultz, Chun is replaced on the CFP committee, and selection committee, THEN and ONLY then can Schultz, Chun be changed, Replaced.
But the faculty does not care about that, because they don't get that IF WSU, OSU, PAC 2 loses CFP, Selection committee representation by no longer having Schultz, Chun on those things, that that WOULD HURT WSU, OSU, PAC 2, ATHLETICALLY, WHICH WOULD HURT WSU, OSU, PAC 2 FINANCIALLY, WHICH WOULD EVENTUALLY HURT WSU'S ENROLLMENT, ACADEMIC FINANCIAL COFFERS, AND HURT WSU'S ACADEMIC RANKING, AND HURT WSU'S ACADEMIC OFFERINGS, AND WOULD HURT WSU'S TIER 1 ACADEMIC RESEARCH, AND WOULD HURT EVERYTHING THAT THE FACULTY WANTS.
FORTUNATELY WSU'S FACULTY IS NOT IN CHARGE.
AND THOSE WHO ARE IN CHARGE OF, HIRED SCHULTZ, ETC, DO KNOW HOW CRITICAL IT IS THAT SCHULTZ AND CHUN CONTINUE TO SIT ON CFP, SELECTION COMMITTEE.