Rapp went underneath the pick and thus couldn't get back out on Martin. If he goes over the pick he forces Martin to drive with time running out. I don't think it was good defense--we let him shoot a squared up jumper without a hand in his face.
Yeah it might have been better defense to go over top of pick, and have remy drive, instead of shoot.
BUT:
1. He could draw a block foul off of drive.
2. He could pull up and shoot either a 3 pointer, or mid range jumper or lane runner for a possible win.
3. Game announcers said that Remy was even behind NBA 3 point range, and 5,6,7,8,9 feet behind the College 3 point line.
4. It wasnt a set 3 point shot from a reasonable range. It was a STEP BACK SEMI FALL AWAY, FALL BACK SHOT OFF THE DRIBBLE, from 27 to 30 to 33 to 37 feet 3 point shot that was even behind NBA 3 point range.
Thats the type of shot you want Remy to take.
Remy had taken about 2,3,4 of those type of shots and missed each time.
If Remy takes 13 of those type of shots, he is going to make 1,2,3 out of 13 of them.
Like I said , you want Remy to take thst shot.
He just got LUCKY and hit it.
But Remy taking that shot was better then Remy driving, and either hitting a CLOSER 3 point shot, or a mid range jump shot. Or a Runner, or drawing a block foul that shoot 2 freethrows.
About 39% to 53% one of those things happen, if Remy drives.
About a 13% to 17% to 23% chance that Remy makes that STEP BACK OFF THE DRIBBLE EXTREMELY LONG 3 POINT SHOT.
Now which is the lower %? 23%(the bad 3 point shot), or 39% to 53% (Remy Driving)
Rapp made the right decision. Made Remy take the worst percentage.
Remy just got LUCKY.
4 TIMES OUT OF 5, WSU would have won.