The ones who fail usually weren't very good to begin with. We rolled the dice for whatever reason. I don't know that Eastman was exactly tearing it up at UNC Wilmington. He was 6 games over .500 and his highest finish was 3rd place in the Colonial Athletic Association. Sampson left him a bit of talent to work with.Not sure I used the adjective “really”. I said good coaches . Eastman had success before Pullman . Bone had success before Pullman. Graham had been with a successful coach at osu and was well respected .
Maybe the point wasn’t well articulated , WSU is a really tough gig .
Graham wasn't a head coach and more importantly was without question totally incompetent to be a head coach at any level.
I'll give you Bone so that's 1 out of 11? WSU is a really difficult gig but the good coaches have found success.
I am glad Dick was the head coach to start but was also excited Tony was obviously the coach-in-waiting. It probably would have taken longer but Tony would have figured it out just like the other really good coaches have in Pullman over the years.