Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I'm just adding to the noise here, but with apologies for that, I believe that the AD has to pay the actual tuition costs for the kids on scholarship, which vary in accordance with whether the kid is a WA resident or not for tuition purposes. I think it actually *does* matter whether the kid is in or out of state for this purpose.Originally posted by ttowncoug:
Here's a question:
Does WSU have the ability to take any discounts on scholarship costs if the kid is in-state vs. out-of-state? My sense is no.
Most native Oregonians are Californians who moved north 20 to 40 years ago, but your point about applying the same quota to a faculty's make up is one I made in discussing this fart of an idea a few days ago. Whether it is faculty or a football recruiting class, you go for the best players possible, wherever they're from. This guy is simply an attention whore.Originally posted by SCglory:
Yes they are. Oregon's legislature is a part-time job and they act like it.
But to the point. The state senator is clearly clueless, about how success works. Oregon has been successful, and their brand now allows them to draw nationally, meaning national competition for the open 22 or 25 or however many spots there are. Oregon's talent is miniscule compared even to mediocre states, let alone the big 3. Say, the U of O's faculty consisted of 25 people....and of course they recruited nationally. Does he expect that Oregon talent would be well represented in the faculty? Of course not. As one poster already said, the senator is a transplant himself (as are many, many "Oregonians"). Like it or not, the fact that UO had no oregonians in this class speaks to the university's success on the field. And each spot is precious...this sound like the geographical equivalent of affirmative action or quotas.....Dumb guy.